Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 2356331 times)

0 Members and 79 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1980 on: March 30, 2017, 05:06:23 PM »
The body was found well wrapped in plastic sheeting so scent could not escape.  Can you provide any evidence found at the lodge?

"Mrs Prout's remains were found wrapped in a curtain and plastic sheeting, the inquest was told."

Where was the curtain taken by cadaver hands?

"A millionaire farmer "snapped" and strangled his wife during an argument before sitting down to a glass of whisky."

Where was he sitting? Eddie alerted at the sofa.

You must remember cadaver scent is only transferable in certain cases, in the other ones it means a body must have been there. &%+((£
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1981 on: March 30, 2017, 05:07:21 PM »
You must remember cadaver scent is only transferable in certain cases, in the other ones it means a body must have been there. &%+((£

who told you that rubbish

Offline Brietta

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1982 on: March 30, 2017, 05:58:19 PM »
You must remember cadaver scent is only transferable in certain cases, in the other ones it means a body must have been there. &%+((£

You will need to post a cite for that ... and when you can't, you should really withdraw the misinformation.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1983 on: March 30, 2017, 06:04:14 PM »
You will need to post a cite for that ... and when you can't, you should really withdraw the misinformation.

Whoosh. It was claimed that the dog alerted in the wrong places in an investigation which led to a convicted murderer yet we are constantly reminded about transference of cadaver scent. Posters can't have it both ways.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1984 on: March 30, 2017, 06:07:41 PM »
You must remember cadaver scent is only transferable in certain cases, in the other ones it means a body must have been there. &%+((£
I am not disputing Eddie's alert in the lounge of the Prout house which was probably as a result of transferrance, only pointing out that he failed to alert in a number of more obvious places where the body had definitely been.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1985 on: March 30, 2017, 06:08:30 PM »
I am not disputing Eddie's alert in the lounge of the Prout house which was probably as a result of transferrance, only pointing out that he failed to alert in a number of more obvious places where the body had definitely been.

But it was known to have been well wrapped up?
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1986 on: March 30, 2017, 06:10:02 PM »
But it was known to have been well wrapped up?
Then how did the cadaver odour get into the lounge but not the landrover or the lodge?

Offline Eleanor

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1987 on: March 30, 2017, 06:12:30 PM »
You must remember cadaver scent is only transferable in certain cases, in the other ones it means a body must have been there. &%+((£

 This just not true.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1988 on: March 30, 2017, 06:19:18 PM »
You must remember cadaver scent is only transferable in certain cases, in the other ones it means a body must have been there. &%+((£

In his rogatory interview Martin Grime was asked:

Quote
'How long does a cadaver have to be in contact with a surface or an object for the odour to be detected''

And Grime's response

Cross-contamination is immediate.

Offline misty

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1989 on: March 30, 2017, 07:14:58 PM »
In his rogatory interview Martin Grime was asked:

And Grime's response

Cross-contamination is immediate.

That rather depends on the post-mortem interval. A person killed at 1am would not contaminate anything at
 1.01 am.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1990 on: March 30, 2017, 07:15:54 PM »
You must remember cadaver scent is only transferable in certain cases, in the other ones it means a body must have been there. &%+((£
The logic seems wrong there Slarti.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1991 on: March 30, 2017, 07:18:33 PM »
That rather depends on the post-mortem interval. A person killed at 1am would not contaminate anything at
 1.01 am.
This seems to be the important issue being missed in the previous discussion, the timeline.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline misty

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1992 on: March 30, 2017, 07:42:27 PM »
This seems to be the important issue being missed in the previous discussion, the timeline.

Agreed. For the cadaver dog to have alerted to the wardrobe a body with a post-mortem time of at least 75mins would have had to have been in there. That doesn't explain the lack of alerts to all the other items pictured in the wardrobe as shown in the crime scene photos.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1993 on: March 30, 2017, 07:46:20 PM »
Agreed. For the cadaver dog to have alerted to the wardrobe a body with a post-mortem time of at least 75mins would have had to have been in there. That doesn't explain the lack of alerts to all the other items pictured in the wardrobe as shown in the crime scene photos.
It gets worse than that too for the dogs didn't arrive till months later.  The time interval before the test was run will mean the signal strength needed to be stronger (long postmortem interval longer) to begin with.
« Last Edit: March 30, 2017, 07:52:31 PM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline misty

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1994 on: April 05, 2017, 02:19:15 PM »
Here's one Pegasus would really like as regards incomplete searching. I heard about it today on the radio. Apparently dogs were also used in the searches (but again, presumably not inside the family home).


http://metro.co.uk/2017/04/04/missing-boy-9-found-under-his-bed-6553326/

Ashitha Nagesh for Metro.co.ukTuesday 4 Apr 2017 2:40 pm

A nine-year-old boy who sparked a major police search after disappearing overnight has been found ‘under his bed’.
Josh Dinning went to bed at around 9.30pm, but when his parents went to wake him up for school he appeared to have vanished.
But after a massive helicopter search, it has been revealed that he was in his room the whole time.
Josh’s older brother, Scott, told local paper Chronicle Live that he was found ‘under a bed’.

‘I was just sitting outside the house when all of a sudden I heard someone saying, “he is here”,’ Scott told the paper.
Apparently Josh had got into the cabinet under the bed. It’s one of those beds that has sliding doors, and somehow he got himself inside and shut the doors.’
Detective Chief Superintendent Vanessa Jardine confirmed that he had been found ‘safe and well’.
As well as the police helicopter search, officers also patrolled a nearby river.

=======================================================================