Wandering Off Topic

[sadie]

Your continued obsession in denigrating Portugal is not unfathomable, I see it as being quite deliberate.

Why did you remove my perfectly reasonable response to this post, stephen ?

You will always win the argument if you keep removing the responses.

How about a fair and level playing field stephen?  You repeatedly keep removing my responses to YOUR comments

FAIR PLAY, please.

[Benice]

This thread is called 'wandering off topic'.

I therefore think it is quite applicable to discuss the behaviour of police in other countries.

Can you cite in the Mccann case, what illegal activity has taken place ?

IYO of course.

This is what you claimed -  which I consider to be an unwarranted personal attack.

''Your continued obsession in denigrating Portugal is not unfathomable, I see it as being quite deliberate.''

You obviously can't provide proof of the  'obsession with denigrating Portugal'  accusations which you have made against me , and neither do you have any intention of answering any of my questions.    In the knowledge that for some unknown reason you never answer any of my questions I won't hold my breath for that to change,  but whilst that does remain the case there is no way that the discussion can move on.

Therefore I will leave you to discuss the behaviour of other police forces.       Whilst doing so perhaps you could you remind us of when you had a single good or positive word to say about your own country's team of SY police officers who have been dealing with this case.     

AIMHO

[stephen25000]

This is what you claimed -  which I consider to be an unwarranted personal attack.

''Your continued obsession in denigrating Portugal is not unfathomable, I see it as being quite deliberate.''

You obviously can't provide proof of the  'obsession with denigrating Portugal'  accusations which you have made against me , and neither do you have any intention of answering any of my questions.    In the knowledge that for some unknown reason you never answer any of my questions I won't hold my breath for that to change,  but whilst that does remain the case there is no way that the discussion can move on.

Therefore I will leave you to discuss the behaviour of other police forces.       Whilst doing so perhaps you could you remind us of when you had a single good or positive word to say about your own country's team of SY police officers who have been dealing with this case.     

AIMHO

You back the Mccanns 100%.

The Mccanns have a vested interest in attacking the PJ. Not that has done them any good.

I have never seen you mention the 'poor' behaviour of other police forces apart from where it is brought up by others.

As to not answering questions,  you should not preach to others.

There is a simple solution, of course, don't respond to my posts, and I won't respond to yours.

A.I.M.H.O. of course.

[stephen25000]

Why did you remove my perfectly reasonable response to this post, stephen ?

You will always win the argument if you keep removing the responses.

How about a fair and level playing field stephen?  You repeatedly keep removing my responses to YOUR comments

FAIR PLAY, please.

How would you know who removed your post Sadie ?

As a reminder, goading posts will be removed.

[Mr Gray]

You back the Mccanns 100%.

The Mccanns have a vested interest in attacking the PJ. Not that has done them any good.

I have never seen you mention the 'poor' behaviour of other police forces apart from where it is brought up by others.

As to not answering questions,  you should not preach to others.

There is a simple solution, of course, don't respond to my posts, and I won't respond to yours.

A.I.M.H.O. of course.

I also back the McCanns 100%......It ten yeras and no real evidence against them and both police forces do not consider them suspects. I therefore think its reasonable to conclude they had no criminal involvement which suggests to me maddie was abducted

[stephen25000]

I also back the McCanns 100%......It ten yeras and no real evidence against them and both police forces do not consider them suspects. I therefore think its reasonable to conclude they had no criminal involvement which suggests to me maddie was abducted

...and they can't find an abductor or evidence of anyone in the apartment.

Hardly surprising.

[Mr Gray]

...and they can't find an abductor or evidence of anyone in the apartment.

Hardly surprising.

it is hardly surprising given the amount of time passed before SY started their investigation...perhaps if SY had forensically exanined the apt they may have found some evidence..
how do you explain the fact that the parents are not suspects

[stephen25000]

it is hardly surprising given the amount of time passed before SY started their investigation...perhaps if SY had forensically exanined the apt they may have found some evidence

You cannot find what doesn't exist.

I.M.H.O.

[barrier]

I also back the McCanns 100%......It ten yeras and no real evidence against them and both police forces do not consider them suspects. I therefore think its reasonable to conclude they had no criminal involvement which suggests to me maddie was abducted

No evidence against any one can be seen to reasonable to conclude there is to be no resolution.

[Mr Gray]

You cannot find what doesn't exist.

I.M.H.O.

Just because you cannot find something does not mean it does not exist...IMO

[barrier]

it is hardly surprising given the amount of time passed before SY started their investigation...perhaps if SY had forensically exanined the apt they may have found some evidence..
how do you explain the fact that the parents are not suspects

No one is so they don't hold any exclusive rights on that.

[Mr Gray]

No evidence against any one can be seen to reasonable to conclude there is to be no resolution.

the fact that the mccanns are not suspects must be significant....imo

[Mr Gray]

No one is so they don't hold any exclusive rights on that.

yet it has been claimed here that the four burglars have been ruled out..is Murat ruled out

[barrier]

the fact that the mccanns are not suspects must be significant....imo

Might be, might not be,lack of evidence means anyone and everyone is free from suspicion which is more significant imo.

[Mr Gray]

Might be, might not be,lack of evidence means anyone and everyone is free from suspicion which is more significant imo.

So you are saying the Mccanns are free from suspicion..fair enough