Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 2416677 times)

0 Members and 124 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3390 on: June 07, 2018, 06:59:13 PM »
Was he convicted in 2009?  Yes he was so he was in hindsight guilty all along.  He would have felt guilty in knowing what he had done prior to the conviction.  If he didn't that is another matter.

Where is the "spittin'mi beer out with laughter emoji" ?
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3391 on: June 07, 2018, 07:02:31 PM »
Where is the "spittin'mi beer out with laughter emoji" ?
You've already used that one!
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3392 on: June 07, 2018, 07:17:56 PM »
But I see what he was convicted of was a crime that happened in 2004, and from what I understand he had been charged with involvement in that crime prior to being made coordinator in the McCann case.
Having these factors in your mind is not conducive to good work IMO.
The date of conviction is less important.

The date of conviction was provided because someone got it wrong. When he was made arguido he pffered to step down from the case and was told to carry on, he says.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Carana

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3393 on: June 07, 2018, 10:39:17 PM »
The date of conviction was provided because someone got it wrong. When he was made arguido he pffered to step down from the case and was told to carry on, he says.

If this was a private conversation, I doubt that there's any official record of it. If there was a formal exchange of correspondence, I haven't come across it in the files.

Every country's police forces have no doubt had "slippery stair" incidents, well before smartphones were around.

True or not, I don't understand how someone under a cloud over an investigation into a missing child could remain as coordinator of an investigation involving another missing child.

So far, I haven't found anything in the regulations about "gardening leave", pending the outcome of such incidents.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3394 on: June 08, 2018, 06:38:26 AM »
If this was a private conversation, I doubt that there's any official record of it. If there was a formal exchange of correspondence, I haven't come across it in the files.

Every country's police forces have no doubt had "slippery stair" incidents, well before smartphones were around.

True or not, I don't understand how someone under a cloud over an investigation into a missing child could remain as coordinator of an investigation involving another missing child.

So far, I haven't found anything in the regulations about "gardening leave", pending the outcome of such incidents.

The fact remains that he was allowed to continue. Is it necessary to understand why?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3395 on: June 08, 2018, 08:40:03 AM »
I wonder why Jane began to feel abandoned? Her evidence is fairly incoherent, but she seems to be saying that Russell was gone longer than she expected when he returned to the Tapas for his meal. According to Russell's statements on 4th and 11th May, however, he only left their apartment at 21.55 to go and get his food.

Reply    “Erm, well Evie was still up, so I was just with Evie in the room and I think it was getting quite and Russell had sort of said ‘I’ll go and finish my meal and then I’ll come back’.  So the next thing I can sort of really remember is thinking ‘Oh I wonder why he’s not’, you know, I think I was thinking ‘Oh he’s got chatting, he’s not gonna’, you know, ‘he’s not gonna come back’, blah, blah, sort of thinking along those lines....... But I don’t know how long that is from, but I think it must have been a fair while from, because I was actually thinking ‘Oh he should be back by now’, sort of actually, you know, to actually look out of the window”.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JANE_TANNER_RIGATORY.htm
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3396 on: June 08, 2018, 09:01:12 AM »
I wonder why Jane began to feel abandoned? Her evidence is fairly incoherent, but she seems to be saying that Russell was gone longer than she expected when he returned to the Tapas for his meal. According to Russell's statements on 4th and 11th May, however, he only left their apartment at 21.55 to go and get his food.

Reply    “Erm, well Evie was still up, so I was just with Evie in the room and I think it was getting quite and Russell had sort of said ‘I’ll go and finish my meal and then I’ll come back’.  So the next thing I can sort of really remember is thinking ‘Oh I wonder why he’s not’, you know, I think I was thinking ‘Oh he’s got chatting, he’s not gonna’, you know, ‘he’s not gonna come back’, blah, blah, sort of thinking along those lines....... But I don’t know how long that is from, but I think it must have been a fair while from, because I was actually thinking ‘Oh he should be back by now’, sort of actually, you know, to actually look out of the window”.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JANE_TANNER_RIGATORY.htm

Keep investigating this aspect please.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3397 on: June 08, 2018, 09:09:59 AM »
 @)(++(* it  sounds like the  tapas  7  were  up and down  like yo yos  during  dinner

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3398 on: June 08, 2018, 09:41:05 AM »
I thought it was Rachael who informed Jane that MM was missing.

Jane 4th May
When she was in the apartment, at about 22.00- 22.15 she heard Kate and Fiona shouting and saying that Madeleine had disappeared.

10th May
Later she heard voices of KH and FP who were in the corridor in front of the bedroom windows and who called, desperately, for Madeleine. When she saw her it was KH herself who told the deponent that Madeleine had disappeared, not clarifying in what circumstances, continuing her search. The deponent stayed in her apartment because her daughter, El, was asleep and the smallest, Ev, was still awake and complaining.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline jassi

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3399 on: June 08, 2018, 09:41:46 AM »
@)(++(* it  sounds like the  tapas  7  were  up and down  like yo yos  during  dinner

It does rather, but in fact it was mainly Tanner & O'Brien who were playing musical chairs.
5 never moved at all after the group assembled.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3400 on: June 08, 2018, 09:51:11 AM »
It does rather, but in fact it was mainly Tanner & O'Brien who were playing musical chairs.
5 never moved at all after the group assembled.

The Paynes and Dianne Webster, Kate and Rachael stayed put.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3401 on: June 08, 2018, 10:04:02 AM »
The Paynes and Dianne Webster, Kate and Rachael stayed put.
Kate??
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline jassi

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3402 on: June 08, 2018, 10:17:54 AM »
Kate??

Only moved at the end of the evening. Gerry left once, right at the beginning.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3403 on: June 08, 2018, 10:25:01 AM »
Only moved at the end of the evening. Gerry left once, right at the beginning.
It was only the end of the evening because she discovered Madeleine missing, but to say she stayed put at the table is nonsense.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline jassi

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3404 on: June 08, 2018, 10:38:05 AM »
It was only the end of the evening because she discovered Madeleine missing, but to say she stayed put at the table is nonsense.
She hadn't budged before then. She sat there from 8.30 until 10.
Nothing to argue about really, but I'm sure you will.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future