Wandering Off Topic

[Mr Gray]

I have never accused SY of conspiring.

You have said a  decision had been made not to investigate the parents....thats a conspiracy to pervert thr course of justice...that is a fact...not opinion...thats your accusation

[G-Unit]

You have said a  decision had been made not to investigate the parents....thats a conspiracy to pervert thr course of justice...that is a fact...not opinion...thats your accusation

So in your opinion deciding not to investigate the McCanns was perverting the course of justice? Perhaps it was assumed that the parents had been cleared by the Portuguese? That's what the McCanns and the MSM said.

[Vertigo Swirl]

How do you explain the fact that three police forces have all been concentrating on investigating Madeleine's abduction for the last few years?  How do you rationalise this to yourself?

^^^the elephant in the room ^^^

[barrier]

How do you explain the fact that three police forces have all been concentrating on investigating Madeleine's abduction for the last few years?  How do you rationalise this to yourself?

That just maybe the very reason no ones been brought to book .

[Mr Gray]

So in your opinion deciding not to investigate the McCanns was perverting the course of justice? Perhaps it was assumed that the parents had been cleared by the Portuguese? That's what the McCanns and the MSM said.

If SY had decided not to investigate the McCanns that would be conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. I think its clear as was stated they looked at all the evidence against the McCanns and came to their opinion they were not involved. I think..like me...they think all the evidence you think implicates them is total junk.

Sutton was never told he could not investigate the Mccanns...more sceptic junk

[Vertigo Swirl]

That just maybe the very reason no ones been brought to book .

How about actually answering the question? 

[barrier]

If SY had decided not to investigate the McCanns that would be conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. I think its clear as was stated they looked at all the evidence against the McCanns and came to their opinion they were not involved. I think..like me...they think all the evidence you think implicates them is total junk.

Sutton was never told he could not investigate the Mccanns...more sceptic junk

Its on tape, Colin Sutton was told that he wouldn't be happy leading the investigation , the SY investigation would be narrowly focused and the investigation would be away from any suspicion of the McCann's or tapas friends.
Seek and you will find.

Also in the press, the very same that keeps telling us CB is the one, so its true.


Colin Sutton said a high-ranking friend in the Met called him and warned him not to lead the case when Scotland Yard announced it would get involved in 2010.

The source warned that he would be tasked with proving her parents Kate and Gerry were innocent and ignoring any alternatives to the abduction theory, he claims.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4467832/Met-interested-proving-McCann-parents-innocent.html

[Mr Gray]

Its on tape, Colin Sutton was told that he wouldn't be happy leading the investigation , the SY investigation would be narrowly focused and the investigation would be away from any suspicion of the McCann's or tapas friends.
Seek and you will find.

Also in the press, the very same that keeps telling us CB is the one, so its true.


Colin Sutton said a high-ranking friend in the Met called him and warned him not to lead the case when Scotland Yard announced it would get involved in 2010.

The source warned that he would be tasked with proving her parents Kate and Gerry were innocent and ignoring any alternatives to the abduction theory, he claims.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4467832/Met-interested-proving-McCann-parents-innocent.html

From suttons blog telling the totality of the advice he received... He was not told he could not investigate the mccanns.. Sceptic junk

However, before this, just a few days after the NotW story I did receive a call from a senior officer in the Met whom I knew quite well.  This officer told me I would do better to avoid the McCann investigation if it did happen, because "You wouldn't be happy leading an investigation where you were told what you could look at and what you could not".

That is the totality of the advice I received. It was made clear that this was an ‘unofficial’

[Wonderfulspam]

From suttons blog telling the totality of the advice he received... He was not told he could not investigate the mccanns.. Sceptic junk

However, before this, just a few days after the NotW story I did receive a call from a senior officer in the Met whom I knew quite well.  This officer told me I would do better to avoid the McCann investigation if it did happen, because "You wouldn't be happy leading an investigation where you were told what you could look at and what you could not".

That is the totality of the advice I received. It was made clear that this was an ‘unofficial’

So, what was he being told he couldn't look for then?

Perhaps it was some types of abduction evidence that were deemed off limits.

Maybe certain kinds of abductor or something.

I was saying before how no one has ever suggested that a female lesbian paedophile could have abducted Maddie, so maybe it was that.

Or Muslim grooming gangs perhaps, never heard them being suggested as potentially responsible either.

[Mr Gray]

So, what was he being told he couldn't look for then?

Perhaps it was some types of abduction evidence that were deemed off limits.

Maybe certain kinds of abductor or something.

I was saying before how no one has ever suggested that a female lesbian paedophile could have abducted Maddie, so maybe it was that.

Or Muslim grooming gangs perhaps, never heard them being suggested as potentially responsible either.

He wouldnt be able to look at anything without the permission of the pj

[Wonderfulspam]

I've seen it mentioned here before that the PJ could be involved in Maddie's abduction.

Thinking it all through, maybe Wolters is actually the abductor, that would explain why he's trying so hard to frame Brueckner.

It all makes sense now, yes, that's my new theory.

[G-Unit]

From suttons blog telling the totality of the advice he received... He was not told he could not investigate the mccanns.. Sceptic junk

However, before this, just a few days after the NotW story I did receive a call from a senior officer in the Met whom I knew quite well.  This officer told me I would do better to avoid the McCann investigation if it did happen, because "You wouldn't be happy leading an investigation where you were told what you could look at and what you could not".

That is the totality of the advice I received. It was made clear that this was an ‘unofficial’

Nevertheless;

my position was one where I was as sceptical of the accepted (abduction) theory as I was of any other. I said I would also like to make the point that Operation Grange was so restricted from the start as to be destined to fail.  In support of this I presented the original Grange terms of reference and told them of the advice I had received in the phone call...
http://colinsutton.blogspot.com/

It looks like he may be correct; Grange may close with nothing achieved.

[Mr Gray]

Nevertheless;

my position was one where I was as sceptical of the accepted (abduction) theory as I was of any other. I said I would also like to make the point that Operation Grange was so restricted from the start as to be destined to fail.  In support of this I presented the original Grange terms of reference and told them of the advice I had received in the phone call...
http://colinsutton.blogspot.com/

It looks like he may be correct; Grange may close with nothing achieved.

It doesn't look like he may be correct... That's your opinion not a fact... Do I need to remind you of forum rules..
Imo... It's a fact that Maddie was murdered by a paedophile.. And Wolters has the proof

[Wonderfulspam]

It doesn't look like he may be correct... That's your opinion not a fact... Do I need to remind you of forum rules..
Imo... It's a fact that Maddie was murdered by a paedophile.. And Wolters has the proof

 

[Vertigo Swirl]

It doesn't look like he may be correct... That's your opinion not a fact... Do I need to remind you of forum rules..
Imo... It's a fact that Maddie was murdered by a paedophile.. And Wolters has the proof

You can say Madeleine was abducted without putting IMO now, the precedent was set when mods turned a blind eye to the numerous posts stating Madeleine was not abducted without any IMO caveat.