Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 2383067 times)

0 Members and 63 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12975 on: June 12, 2022, 09:47:52 AM »
Heavens, you really are so deep in denial I bet you couldn't even bring yourself to answer the questions I asked you even in your own head.  It is very clear to anyone with an ounce of common sense that the PJ are supporting the German investigation (albeit in their own, sweet, plodding obstructive way), the Germans have said as much and if I'm not very mistaken so have the PJ, quite recently - don't ask for a cite, but it's on here somewhere.  And of course there is the little matter of the PJ having made Bruckner an arguido, which I'm sure means they're not investigating abduction - at all, no sirree....  (&^&

Not getting very far though are they, it's Brueckner or bust, & Brueckner doesn't look like being charged anytime ever.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12976 on: June 12, 2022, 10:03:14 AM »
It doesn't look like he may be correct... That's your opinion not a fact... Do I need to remind you of forum rules..
Imo... It's a fact that Maddie was murdered by a paedophile.. And Wolters has the proof

Nope, its a fact Wolters says she was murdered , the rest is pure conjecture.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12977 on: June 12, 2022, 10:11:50 AM »
Heavens, you really are so deep in denial I bet you couldn't even bring yourself to answer the questions I asked you even in your own head.  It is very clear to anyone with an ounce of common sense that the PJ are supporting the German investigation (albeit in their own, sweet, plodding obstructive way), the Germans have said as much and if I'm not very mistaken so have the PJ, quite recently - don't ask for a cite, but it's on here somewhere.  And of course there is the little matter of the PJ having made Bruckner an arguido, which I'm sure means they're not investigating abduction - at all, no sirree....  (&^&

The PJ made Murat an arguido, the PJ made the McCanns arguidos, the PJ had the three amigos back in 2014 that SY had nailed on to have abducted and killed Madeleine arguidos, then around December 2014 there was another passel of arguidos made it was reported, the sum total of that, feck all, just as it is now. CB could well be an important witness to the events of 3/05/2007 if he was around that night, although Wolters is on record on ch5 telling the world CB cannot be placed in Luz that night, so thats why he's bang to rights over the abduction, not.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12978 on: June 12, 2022, 10:24:32 AM »
Let me help you.. The McCanns are telling the truth.. Wolters is telling the truth.. CB is telling lies.. The original Portuguese investigation didn't have a clue

Thanks for sharing your beliefs.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12979 on: June 12, 2022, 10:27:02 AM »
Nope, its a fact Wolters says she was murdered , the rest is pure conjecture.

Ive decided to follow the example set by admin and gunit and state my opinion as fact...and it is

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12980 on: June 12, 2022, 10:36:00 AM »
Let me help you.. The McCanns are telling the truth.. Wolters is telling the truth.. CB is telling lies.. The original Portuguese investigation didn't have a clue

So. If the McCanns told the truth was the nanny telling lies?

"I was in the apartment less than five minutes after they found that Madeleine had gone...We told the head of department what had happened and she took us straight to the apartment.
 
"There were no children in the room. The twins had been taken out already, I think by one of the McCanns' friends.
https://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id70.htm
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12981 on: June 12, 2022, 11:22:39 AM »
So. If the McCanns told the truth was the nanny telling lies?

"I was in the apartment less than five minutes after they found that Madeleine had gone...We told the head of department what had happened and she took us straight to the apartment.
 
"There were no children in the room. The twins had been taken out already, I think by one of the McCanns' friends.
https://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id70.htm

You look at things very simplistically. statements were translated ina very unreliable way....one persons recall of the same incident may be different...no one was lying. I find tht  avery silly thing to say

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12982 on: June 12, 2022, 11:26:48 AM »
So. If the McCanns told the truth was the nanny telling lies?

"I was in the apartment less than five minutes after they found that Madeleine had gone...We told the head of department what had happened and she took us straight to the apartment.
 
"There were no children in the room. The twins had been taken out already, I think by one of the McCanns' friends.
https://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id70.htm

i think its absolutely pathetic of you and shows a poor understanding of the case taht you see such trivial inconsistencies as important...absolutely laughable

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12983 on: June 12, 2022, 11:42:03 AM »
i think its absolutely pathetic of you and shows a poor understanding of the case taht you see such trivial inconsistencies as important...absolutely laughable

Yet  CB's trivial inconsistencies become major.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12984 on: June 12, 2022, 11:53:31 AM »
You look at things very simplistically. statements were translated ina very unreliable way....one persons recall of the same incident may be different...no one was lying. I find tht  avery silly thing to say

Do you? No translation was involved in this claim by the nanny. So either she was in 5A 'less than 5 minutes' after Madeleine's disappearance and failed to see two cots with children in them, or she made the story up or the twins weren't there. Your choice.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12985 on: June 12, 2022, 11:54:36 AM »
Yet  CB's trivial inconsistencies become major.

Well yeah, & if he did tell Busching he murdered Maddie, then he was definitely telling the truth & there's even a photo which proves it.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12986 on: June 12, 2022, 11:54:53 AM »
Do you? No translation was involved in this claim by the nanny. So either she was in 5A 'less than 5 minutes' after Madeleine's disappearance and failed to see two cots with children in them, or she made the story up or the twins weren't there. Your choice.

Laughable

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12987 on: June 12, 2022, 12:03:13 PM »
Well yeah, & if he did tell Busching he murdered Maddie, then he was definitely telling the truth & there's even a photo which proves it.

In your dreams.....
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline John

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12988 on: June 12, 2022, 12:25:25 PM »
Nope, its a fact Wolters says she was murdered , the rest is pure conjecture.

Wolters certainly claims that Madeleine was murdered but has provided nothing to support that claim. I think for the time being we are correct to be sceptical of anything he says.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12989 on: June 12, 2022, 12:37:49 PM »
Laughable

A lot of peculiar things were said and we don't know if they were true, or made up for attention or money. Truth in this case is very hard to identify imo.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0