Wandering Off Topic

[Wonderfulspam]

How do you know what was said?  How do you know Gerry didn't ask someone to call the Police?  You weren't there so stop trying to make out you were.

All I know is they were traumatised as any parents would be in that situation.  Propaganda!!  Gerry took Madeleine body to wasteland according to you.  He didn't though did he he was there at the table when the Smith's saw their man.  He was searching around the apartments for Madeleine he was searching around the cars the pool.  He was in the apartment many saw him. So when exactly did he make this trip to wasteland?  When everyone even the employees were there searching.  I've had enough of this 'debate' if you can call it that.  You just like to have it your way you don't like proof.

What a load of horse shit. There's no evidence Gerry sent Matt to reception, certainly not from Matt himself, only that Fiona did so sod off to websleuths with your pro McCann propaganda. There's evidence the alarm was raised before 10pm, which means Gerry had time to be seen by the Smiths. He only reappeared in the apartment later. The only people searching initially were Gerry, Matt, David & Russell, Fiona, not all the staff as you make out, then Gerry suggested they split up & search. After that there's no evidence of his exact whereabouts. Apart from the Smith sighting.

[Wonderfulspam]

You offer proof of absolutely nothing Lace & you're full of pro McCann shite. Forget proof, where's the evidence that Madeleine was abducted because I can't find any. Only the Smith sighting. Which was Gerry.

[faithlilly]

I think the lack of urgency, transparency and funding with which the parents treated the Smith sighting speaks volumes.

[Lace]

What a load of horse shit. There's no evidence Gerry sent Matt to reception, certainly not from Matt himself, only that Fiona did so sod off to websleuths with your pro McCann propaganda. There's evidence the alarm was raised before 10pm, which means Gerry had time to be seen by the Smiths. He only reappeared in the apartment later. The only people searching initially were Gerry, Matt, David & Russell, Fiona, not all the staff as you make out, then Gerry suggested they split up & search. After that there's no evidence of his exact whereabouts. Apart from the Smith sighting.

Ok my mistake Gerry told Matt to ring the second time not the first.  Sorry how could he have taken Madeleine to waste ground  when everyone seems to remember him being in 5a.  Gerry stayed at the table until Kate give the alarm he didn't leave the table to take Madeleine to waste ground.

[Wonderfulspam]

Ok my mistake Gerry told Matt to ring the second time not the first.  Sorry how could he have taken Madeleine to waste ground  when everyone seems to remember him being in 5a.  Gerry stayed at the table until Kate give the alarm he didn't leave the table to take Madeleine to waste ground.

He took an unusually long time on his 9pm check, according to Jane. Gerry goes into the apartment, then Madeleine disappears, so, he must have taken her out. He's the last person to see her, apart from the Smiths. It isn't difficult to join the dots really.

[Wonderfulspam]

Besides, not everyone saw him in 5a. When Fiona & Matt went to the apartment after the initial search Gerry wasn't there. That's when Fiona sent Matt to reception.

[Wonderfulspam]

I think the lack of urgency, transparency and funding with which the parents treated the Smith sighting speaks volumes.

Only to some of us apparently, Faith. There are some people here who claim there's no logical or plausible theory of the Mccanns involvement. Until I explained it to them anyway. Now they've disappeared. Probably ran away to websleuths. Couldn't handle it anymore.

[misty]

That's only theory. But it's possible that happened based on, the alarm being raised before 10pm, Gerry suggesting everyone split up, him disappearing & then being seen by the Smiths. Added to that that the only evidence Madeleine was abducted is the Smith sighting, where Maddie, in the wrong pyjamas, wasn't looking too well.

All the evidence given by the Smith family in their May 2007 statements indicated they saw an unknown  man carrying a child, who may have been Madeleine, towards the beach. As they must have known what Madeleine looked like, via media etc, then equally they must have known what Gerry looked like before approaching police.
Their statements supported the abduction by stranger theory and nothing else. Have you considered the possibility the Smiths too were part of your grand cover-up conspiracy as orchestrated by Team McCann?

[Wonderfulspam]

All the evidence given by the Smith family in their May 2007 statements indicated they saw an unknown  man carrying a child, who may have been Madeleine, towards the beach. As they must have known what Madeleine looked like, via media etc, then equally they must have known what Gerry looked like before approaching police.
Their statements supported the abduction by stranger theory and nothing else. Have you considered the possibility the Smiths too were part of your grand cover-up conspiracy as orchestrated by Team McCann?

The sighting supports abduction by a stranger, who resembled Gerry & had drugged Maddie & changed her pyjamas, if we account for the details. Indeed, your heroes SY depicted Smithman's Maddie in the long sleeve pyjamas her mother wished she'd dressed her in. So you're in good company, they too believe there's a Gerrylike, anaesthetist, pyjama changing paedo abductor on the loose. I wonder why there haven't been any similar abductions?

[misty]

The sighting supports abduction by a stranger, who resembled Gerry & had drugged Maddie & changed her pyjamas, if we account for the details. Indeed, your heroes SY depicted Smithman's Maddie in the long sleeve pyjamas her mother wished she'd dressed her in. So you're in good company, they too believe there's a Gerrylike, anaesthetist, pyjama changing paedo abductor on the loose. I wonder why there haven't been any similar abductions?

Please provide cites from the Smiths' original statements made in May 2007 confirming the man they saw resembled Gerry.

[Wonderfulspam]

Please provide cites from the Smiths' original statements made in May 2007 confirming the man they saw resembled Gerry.

You know fully well that Smith identified Gerry later. But, the typically British, blonde little girl, who wasn't looking very well, she was dressed in the pyjamas the McCanns claim Maddie wasn't. When you add that to the alarm being raised before 10pm & Gerry suggesting they split up & search, then disappearing. When you put it all together it's obvious it was Gerry.

[Wonderfulspam]

You know fully well that Smith identified Gerry later. But, the typically British, blonde little girl, who wasn't looking very well, she was dressed in the pyjamas the McCanns claim Maddie wasn't. When you add that to the alarm being raised before 10pm & Gerry suggesting they split up & search, then disappearing. When you put it all together it's obvious it was Gerry.

Added to that, the innocent Mccanns who are totally innocent & Gerry couldn't possibly have been Smithman, because he was at the tapas at the time of the sighting, supposedly. The innocent McCanns ignored the advice of experts, buried the Smith e-fits & never promoted the sighting. When you add that to it is even more obvious the man the Smiths saw was Gerry McCann. No gangs of predatory paedophiles breaking in drugging Maddie then passing her out of the window off into a waiting getaway car. There's no evidence of any of that. Only evidence Madeleine, in the wrong pyjamas, was deceased & her parents covered up the death by faking an abduction. That is all that can be reasonably deduced from the totality of the Smith sighting when accounting for the evidence. Basically.

[misty]

You know fully well that Smith identified Gerry later. But, the typically British, blonde little girl, who wasn't looking very well, she was dressed in the pyjamas the McCanns claim Maddie wasn't. When you add that to the alarm being raised before 10pm & Gerry suggesting they split up & search, then disappearing. When you put it all together it's obvious it was Gerry.

Why did one Smith family member "go rogue", months after stating he wouldn't recognise the stranger again? Which parts of his original testimony supporting a possible stranger abduction were lies, thus casting doubt on the veracity of the other family members' statements?

[Wonderfulspam]

Why did one Smith family member "go rogue", months after stating he wouldn't recognise the stranger again? Which parts of his original testimony supporting a possible stranger abduction were lies, thus casting doubt on the veracity of the other family members' statements?

Why are you obfuscating?  Is the truth a little uncomfortable for you?

[misty]

Why are you obfuscating?  Is the truth a little uncomfortable for you?

I rather thought it was the other way around.