Wandering Off Topic

[Vertigo Swirl]

I'm born & live in the UK with no connection to Russia & have a long history of shit posting proving infact I am a real person. It seems when something contradicts your world view I'm suddenly in cohorts with Russia.

That's what they all say...

[Vertigo Swirl]

Do I 'like' Russia? Well I've got nothing against them & I think it wouldn't be a bad idea to trade peacefully with them, rather than funding Neo Nazis to attack the country. It would make sense to leave them alone really & I like to be able to afford to put the heating on in winter every now & then. Russia could help with that. If not for the USA & EU.

Perhaps you should get a job if you want to be able to put the heating on.  Or apply to get your benefits increased.  I am able to heat my 4 bedroom house and I don't earn that much. 

[Wonderfulspam]

Perhaps you should get a job if you want to be able to put the heating on.  Or apply to get your benefits increased.  I am able to heat my 4 bedroom house and I don't earn that much.

I'm alright really. But many others aren't. We have the highest energy bills in Europe. Despite sitting on a shit load of coal, north sea oil & gas & capacity to build nuclear power stations for the past over 50 odd years. During the recent heatwave in June the national grid was close to capacity according to a whistle blower.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I'm alright really. But many others aren't. We have the highest energy bills in Europe. Despite sitting on a shit load of coal, north sea oil & gas & capacity to build nuclear power stations for the past over 50 odd years. During the recent heatwave in June the national grid was close to capacity according to a whistle blower.

They?ve been threatening us with nationwide blackouts for years now.  Perhaps it will happen this winter, eh?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Some light reading for the Spambotzki - it will make a change from the alt-right pro-Russian conspiracy nutjob output he normally immerses himself in

https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/putins-next-move-five-russian-attack-scenarios-europe-must-prepare-for/

[Wonderfulspam]

The Jason Arday plagarism row is quite hilarious & highlights something I said previously. Institutions are promoting black people based on the colour of their skin & not the quality of their work or anything else. It has backfired spectacularly here. Jason Cofnas, the former professor who scrutinised Arday's work & found the plagiarism was heavily protested & is now unemployable. Describing himself as a race realist. Having studied IQ & race he once wrote in a paper that....

"Under a colorblind system that judged applicants only by academic qualifications, blacks would make up 0.7% of Harvard students. (Even that might be an overestimate, since high-school credentials are sometimes given a boost by affirmative action.) In a meritocracy, Harvard faculty would be recruited from the best of the best students, which means the number of black professors would approach 0%. Blacks would disappear from almost all high-profile positions outside of sports and entertainment."

[Wonderfulspam]

Some light reading for the Spambotzki - it will make a change from the alt-right pro-Russian conspiracy nutjob output he normally immerses himself in

https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/putins-next-move-five-russian-attack-scenarios-europe-must-prepare-for/

The Atlantic Council are funded by the U.S government. You don't suppose they might have a certain bias & agenda do you?

A consortium of autocratic states (China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea)?enabled by supporters such as India, Brazil, South Africa, and others?supports Russian aggression in Ukraine directly and indirectly by providing arms, troops, or markets that prop up Russia?s war economy.

The strongest and most alarming trend in global affairs is the rise of autocratic regimes that threaten the stability of the international system.

By 'Threaten the international system' they mean the countries mentioned oppose US unipolar dominance, are gradually de-dollarising & forming their own trade bloc. The US will stop at nothing to prevent it. Including war & anti Russian propaganda.

[Vertigo Swirl]

The Atlantic Council are funded by the U.S government. You don't suppose they might have a certain bias & agenda do you?

A consortium of autocratic states (China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea)?enabled by supporters such as India, Brazil, South Africa, and others?supports Russian aggression in Ukraine directly and indirectly by providing arms, troops, or markets that prop up Russia?s war economy.

The strongest and most alarming trend in global affairs is the rise of autocratic regimes that threaten the stability of the international system.

By 'Threaten the international system' they mean the countries mentioned oppose US unipolar dominance, are gradually de-dollarising & forming their own trade bloc. The US will stop at nothing to prevent it. Including war & anti Russian propaganda.

So the article?s completely mistaken and the 5 Russian attack scenarios on Europe are utterly fanciful US propaganda (despite being the researched opinion of dozens of military experts).  In which case NATO may as well reduce its defence spending to zero as obviously Russia has no designs on European territory at all, seeing as how we?re just a worthless blob on the atlas and a complete waste of space that no one in their right minds would want to invade or control.

[Wonderfulspam]

So the article?s completely mistaken and the 5 Russian attack scenarios on Europe are utterly fanciful US propaganda (despite being the researched opinion of dozens of military experts).  In which case NATO may as well reduce its defence spending to zero as obviously Russia has no designs on European territory at all, seeing as how we?re just a worthless blob on the atlas and a complete waste of space that no one in their right minds would want to invade or control.

The entire article is a US propaganda piece. The dozens of military experts you appeal to are all paid by the US government. The threat level on NATO from Russia was non existent. Until we started funding & arming Ukraine. Russia was right to be fearful of NATO however. Owing to NATO's consistent track record of attacking multiple countries & toppling governments.

[Vertigo Swirl]

The entire article is a US propaganda piece. The dozens of military experts you appeal to are all paid by the US government. The threat level on NATO from Russia was non existent. Until we started funding & arming Ukraine. Russia was right to be fearful of NATO however. Owing to NATO's consistent track record of attacking multiple countries & toppling governments.

And do you seriously believe (like Putin) that NATO poses a threat to Russian security?  Please explain how exactly.

[Wonderfulspam]

And do you seriously believe (like Putin) that NATO poses a threat to Russian security?  Please explain how exactly.

By funding & supporting a Banderite Russophobic uprising & insurrection in Ukraine culminating in the 2014 coup in Russias closest neighbour. Causing a civil war aimed at destabilising Ukraine & it being politically captured & used as a proxy in a war to weaken Russia. What we are seeing now basically.

[Vertigo Swirl]

By funding & supporting a Banderite Russophobic uprising & insurrection in Ukraine culminating in the 2014 coup in Russias closest neighbour. Causing a civil war aimed at destabilising Ukraine & it being politically captured & used as a proxy in a war to weaken Russia. What we are seeing now basically.

How does invading Ukraine lessen that threat for Russia?  Is there civil war in Russia?  I wasn?t aware of this.  And how is it that NATO can pose a threat to Russia but Russia poses no threat to Europe in your view?

[Wonderfulspam]

How does invading Ukraine lessen that threat for Russia?  Is there civil war in Russia?  I wasn?t aware of this.  And how is it that NATO can pose a threat to Russia but Russia poses no threat to Europe in your view?

Russia invaded Ukraine to demilitarise & de Nazify it. That was the stated aim of the SMO. Ukraine was destabilised by the west to provoke the civil war there which lead Russian speakers in the east to require protection from Russia. It isn't complicated I already explained it. Up until 2022 Russia hadn't attacked any countries or attacked NATO. Whereas NATO has a proven track record of attacking countries & toppling governments.

[Wonderfulspam]

Poor VS believes NATO is a defensive alliance.


Countries attacked by the United States (selected major cases since World War II)

Japan (1945)
North Korea (1950?1953)
China (during the Korean War)
Vietnam
Laos
Cambodia
Lebanon
Dominican Republic
Grenada
Libya
Panama
Iraq (1991, 1993, 1998, 2003?2011, and later operations)
Somalia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Sudan
Afghanistan (1998 strikes; 2001?2021 war)
Serbia / Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (1999)
Pakistan (drone strikes)
Yemen
Syria
Iran (limited strikes, including 2020)
Others through smaller-scale strikes or special operations. The U.S. has also conducted hundreds of military interventions of varying sizes since its founding.


Countries attacked by NATO as an alliance

Bosnia and Herzegovina (1994?1995 air operations)
Serbia / Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Kosovo air campaign, 1999)
Afghanistan (ISAF mission after 2001)
Libya (2011 air campaign enforcing UN Security Council Resolution 1973)

NATO has also conducted peacekeeping, training, maritime security, and humanitarian missions in places such as Kosovo, Iraq, Pakistan, the Mediterranean, and the Horn of Africa, but these are distinct from offensive military campaigns.


NATO is an extension of the US military. The 'threat' of boogie man Russia attacking NATO countries was dreamt up to boost sales for the military industrial complex.

[Wonderfulspam]

Ukraine 2010 Elections




Notice the split between Russian speakers in the East & Pro EU/NATO Ukrainians in the West.