Wandering Off Topic

[Wonderfulspam]

The problem is though Spam, the Met have never said that the abductor looked like Gerry or that the abductor changed Madeleine's pyjamas.  That's YOUR interpretation of it.

No, it's Smith & wifes testimony that they believed it was Gerry. Aoife's testimony that Maddie had long sleeve pyjamas on.

[Wonderfulspam]

No he's not.  And I still believe there's a strong likelihood that the police have got their sights fixed on the right suspect, nailing him is proving more tricky, but that doesn't mean they're barking up the wrong tree.

Ok dear. They've just got to find the missing evidence then. It shouldn't be much longer now.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Ok dear. They've just got to find the missing evidence then. It shouldn't be much longer now.

Sometimes cases take 30 or 40 years to reach a successful conviction,  so I wouldn't hold your breath. 

[Wonderfulspam]

Sometimes cases take 30 or 40 years to reach a successful conviction,  so I wouldn't hold your breath.

You've probably only got another 10 years left at your age so I wouldn't waste time believing Brueckner will ever be charged.

[Vertigo Swirl]

No, it's Smith & wifes testimony that they believed it was Gerry. Aoife's testimony that Maddie had long sleeve pyjamas on.

They thought it might be Gerry, they didn't say they were certain it was him.  The girl may or may not have been wearing long sleeve pjs - if she was then it wasn't Madeleine.  Of course Aoife was giving her statement weeks after catching a fleeting glimpse of the child in the dark but for some reason you believe she has a photographic memory and perfect recall.  Why is that I wonder...?

[Vertigo Swirl]

You've probably only got another 10 years left at your age so I wouldn't waste time believing Brueckner will ever be charged.

Oh really?  And what age would that be?  Have you some knowledge of the condition of my health that I myself am unaware of?

[Wonderfulspam]

They thought it might be Gerry, they didn't say they were certain it was him.  The girl may or may not have been wearing long sleeve pjs - if she was then it wasn't Madeleine.  Of course Aoife was giving her statement weeks after catching a fleeting glimpse of the child in the dark but for some reason you believe she has a photographic memory and perfect recall.  Why is that I wonder...?

60-80% sure = More certain than not that it was Gerry. That's because it was Gerry.

[Wonderfulspam]

Oh really?  And what age would that be?  Have you some knowledge of the condition of my health that I myself am unaware of?

Well I know you work yourself up into a frenzy & can't handle it when you're not winning an argument. Probably not good for your blood pressure.

[Wonderfulspam]

Why did Gerry put the time the alarm was raised as being around 10:15pm, up to 20 odd minutes later than most of the rest of the group, in his second account of the truth, VS? Why was that?
I'll give you a hint. It's because he was seen by the Smiths at around 10:03. It's because of that.

[Vertigo Swirl]

60-80% sure = More certain than not that it was Gerry. That's because it was Gerry.

That?s not what the Met thinks.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Well I know you work yourself up into a frenzy & can't handle it when you're not winning an argument. Probably not good for your blood pressure.

I actually have perfect blood pressure, occasionally a little on the low side.  You don?t adversely effect my health but you are admittedly a pain in the bum.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Why did Gerry put the time the alarm was raised as being around 10:15pm, up to 20 odd minutes later than most of the rest of the group, in his second account of the truth, VS? Why was that?
I'll give you a hint. It's because he was seen by the Smiths at around 10:03. It's because of that.

That?s not what the Met thinks.