Wandering Off Topic

[Wonderfulspam]

They didn?t pass comment on its reliability, they simply hoped it would jog someone?s memory to come forward with further information.

They had no choice. There's no evidence Madeleine was abducted. Other than the Smiths sighting.

[Wonderfulspam]

Not once have the MET said the McCanns are innocent. According to Rowley though, they haven't even investigated them. Funny way to run a missing person's investigation. To dismiss the most likely suspects without investigating them.

[Wonderfulspam]

I trust the police, or more specifically Operation Grange in this case to be interested in solving the crime without fear or favour and to look at the facts objectively.  But it seems you only trust the police when it suits you to and that?s when they went on Crimewatch, disregarding the fact that they have categorically stated the McCanns are not involved.   You can?t use Operation Grange to support your beliefs because they don?t.
Gerry originally said the alarm was raised just after 10 and I have no idea why he then said 10.15pm.  A mistake?  A misreporting?  A poor translation?  But the fact of the matter is that not even Kate backed up this timing because there is no mention in her book that that is the time she raised the alarm.  You would have thought that if it was so important to establish the 10.15pm alarm call she might have reinforced it in her book.  In any case the PJ had ample opportunity to quiz Gerry about this discrepancy (if it ever actually existed) and I don?t think I have ever read even Amaral reference it specifically, so clearly it?s a red herring which you have latched onto to bolster your own bonkers theory.

So, the PJ haven't questioned Gerry about his timings. Neither have the MET because they haven't even questioned the McCanns & neither has Wolters because he's never even met them either. So the experts you put your faith in have apparently established the exact timeline without any real diligence. And the best you can do is dismiss reality as 'bonkers'.

[Wonderfulspam]

It isn't difficult really. Only for the gullible and hard of thinking.

Gerry moves her out of the apartment during his noticeably unusually long (as per Jane Tanner) check at 9pm.

The alarm is raised before 10pm (as per Matt & Russell's half eaten steak)

Gerry suggests they split up & search (as per Russell) & Gerry is missing until he is seen some time later by Berry & Balu & it is during that time he is seen by the Smiths, carrying a dead weight, dressed in the wrong pyjamas.

What this case exposes is just how utterly stupid McCann supporters are. It is simply unreasonable that I should have to share society with such stupid gullible retarded morons who believe Madeleine was abducted simply because Kate & Gerry said so, even though Gerry was seen by the Smiths.

[Wonderfulspam]

The world would be a much better place if McCann supporters were just taken out the back, lined up & shot.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Like I said, you cannot explain why he went from 10:03 to 10:13 with his timings. Whereas, I can.

Did you read anything I wrote?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Not once have the MET said the McCanns are innocent. According to Rowley though, they haven't even investigated them. Funny way to run a missing person's investigation. To dismiss the most likely suspects without investigating them.

I think you?ll find that they have said on several occasions that they don?t believe the McCanns were involved and they think Madeleine was taken by a stranger, so how does that square with the McCanns not being innocent?  Whatever you think of the Met, they clearly don?t think the McCanns are involved so you cant use them and what they have said as evidence that they are involved.

[Wonderfulspam]

I think you?ll find that they have said on several occasions that they don?t believe the McCanns were involved and they think Madeleine was taken by a stranger, so how does that square with the McCanns not being innocent?  Whatever you think of the Met, they clearly don?t think the McCanns are involved so you cant use them and what they have said as evidence that they are involved.

I use evidence as evidence the McCanns were involved, because they did it. You use appeal to authority as evidence they weren't. But the authority you appeal to have admitted they haven't even investigated the McCanns & the only evidence they have ever released of abduction is the sighting of Gerry.

[Vertigo Swirl]

So, the PJ haven't questioned Gerry about his timings. Neither have the MET because they haven't even questioned the McCanns & neither has Wolters because he's never even met them either. So the experts you put your faith in have apparently established the exact timeline without any real diligence. And the best you can do is dismiss reality as 'bonkers'.

Of course, only the armchair detectives have got it sussed.  Isn?t that always the way though?  The online sleuths know better until they are proved wrong and then they all slink away until the next case where they can prove their sheer brilliance and one upmanship over everyone else, especially the police.  Lucky for them, this case has yet to result in a firm and legal conviction so of course it?s manna from heaven for them.  They will keep on spewing their idiotic theories until they can be definitively proven wrong, and even then they?re likely to shout cover up and conspiracy cos of corrupt police.

[Vertigo Swirl]

The world would be a much better place if McCann supporters were just taken out the back, lined up & shot.

And this post proves how utterly deranged McCann sceptics are on the whole, and simply cannot be taken seriously.

[Wonderfulspam]

Of course, only the armchair detectives have got it sussed.  Isn?t that always the way though?  The online sleuths know better until they are proved wrong and then they all slink away until the next case where they can prove their sheer brilliance and one upmanship over everyone else, especially the police.  Lucky for them, this case has yet to result in a firm and legal conviction so of course it?s manna from heaven for them.  They will keep on spewing their idiotic theories until they can be definitively proven wrong, and even then they?re likely to shout cover up and conspiracy cos of corrupt police.

I'm just following the evidence. The evidence is, the McCanns did it. There are no other possibilities.

[Wonderfulspam]

And this post proves how utterly deranged McCann sceptics are on the whole, and simply cannot be taken seriously.

I can't take anything you say seriously because you are a stupid gullible woman.

[Wonderfulspam]

Did you read anything I wrote?

No, I skim your posts because you tend to be completely wrong about everything.

[Wonderfulspam]

I feel it's time we revisited all the verifiable evidence that Madeleine was abducted.

1) There isn't any.

All there is, is a sighting of Gerry abducting Maddie, & Maddie wasn't looking very well.

[Vertigo Swirl]

No, I skim your posts because you tend to be completely wrong about everything.

If you don?t even read my posts then that?s the equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and going blahblahblah I don?t want to hear it, which indicates someone with such a huge and fragile ego that they can?t bear to hear or read an alternative point of view, which in turn makes this not a discussion but simply a further demonstration of you strutting about the board like a shitting pigeon knocking all the pieces over and claiming you?re the best.