Wandering Off Topic

[Vertigo Swirl]

I feel it's time we revisited all the verifiable evidence that Madeleine was abducted.

1) There isn't any.

All there is, is a sighting of Gerry abducting Maddie, & Maddie wasn't looking very well.

Except there was no verifiable evidence that Gerry abducted Madeleine, so you need to try a little harder.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I'm just following the evidence. The evidence is, the McCanns did it. There are no other possibilities.

Except that there are.  It's like saying that because thousands and thousands of people claim to have seen the Loch Ness Monster, Big Foot and aliens that all these must exist and there can be no other possible explanation for their existence - other than perhaps all these thousands upon thousands of people were wrong / mistaken / lying.  And then let's not forget all the people who were convinced they have seen Madeleine post disappearance.  Because they said they saw her they must be right I suppose, just like two of the Smiths said the man they saw might have been Gerry it MUST have been him.  It's nonsense, stupid, ludicrous and idiotic to simply accept the word of two witnesses (who weren't even sure who they saw) in statements given weeks and months after the event.  It's utterly nuts.  But this is the logic of the forum troll. 

[Wonderfulspam]

Except there was no verifiable evidence that Gerry abducted Madeleine, so you need to try a little harder.

I will not be taking advice from people stupid enough to believe the McCanns. People who believe the McCanns are equally complicit in Madeleine's murder & effectively helped Gerry throw Maddie in the bin.

[Wonderfulspam]

Except that there are.  It's like saying that because thousands and thousands of people claim to have seen the Loch Ness Monster, Big Foot and aliens that all these must exist and there can be no other possible explanation for their existence - other than perhaps all these thousands upon thousands of people were wrong / mistaken / lying.  And then let's not forget all the people who were convinced they have seen Madeleine post disappearance.  Because they said they saw her they must be right I suppose, just like two of the Smiths said the man they saw might have been Gerry it MUST have been him.  It's nonsense, stupid, ludicrous and idiotic to simply accept the word of two witnesses (who weren't even sure who they saw) in statements given weeks and months after the event.  It's utterly nuts.  But this is the logic of the forum troll.

The only evidence Madeleine was abducted is Gerry abducting Maddie. That is the only evidence of stranger abduction presented by the police. I'm just following the evidence.

[Wonderfulspam]

If you don?t even read my posts then that?s the equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and going blahblahblah I don?t want to hear it, which indicates someone with such a huge and fragile ego that they can?t bear to hear or read an alternative point of view, which in turn makes this not a discussion but simply a further demonstration of you strutting about the board like a shitting pigeon knocking all the pieces over and claiming you?re the best.

You said you didn't know why Gerry changed his times. In contrast, I do know why he changed his times, & have explained why. So in summary Me = Smart. You = Not.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You said you didn't know why Gerry changed his times. In contrast, I do know why he changed his times, & have explained why. So in summary Me = Smart. You = Not.

The only way you can know why Gerry did this is if he told you.  Has he?  How can you definitively rule out any of the other explanations I have given for the discrepancy?  Do you think it would be smarter of me to simply accept everything you say or to question the logic you have used to come to your conclusions?

[Vertigo Swirl]

The only evidence Madeleine was abducted is Gerry abducting Maddie. That is the only evidence of stranger abduction presented by the police. I'm just following the evidence.

  All I can say to that is LOL. 

[Wonderfulspam]

Up until a few months ago VS shit out the mantra that 'it's impossible for Gerry to be in two places at once' every time the Smith sighting was mentioned.
It took a misogynist forum wum to explain to her how it was indeed possible. She couldn't even begin to work it out for herself. That's how intelligent she is. So no. I will not be lectured to by stupid women.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I will not be taking advice from people stupid enough to believe the McCanns. People who believe the McCanns are equally complicit in Madeleine's murder & effectively helped Gerry throw Maddie in the bin.

OK, describe below all the evidence that verifies the Smith sighting as Gerry.  Clue - to verify means  to make sure or demonstrate that (something) is true, accurate, or justified.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Up until a few months ago VS shit out the mantra that 'it's impossible for Gerry to be in two places at once' every time the Smith sighting was mentioned.
It took a misogynist forum wum to explain to her how it was indeed possible. She couldn't even begin to work it out for herself. That's how intelligent she is. So no. I will not be lectured to by stupid women.

Spam, it is physically impossible for someone to be in two places at once. 

[Wonderfulspam]

  All I can say to that is LOL.

What else is there?   Kate & Gerry claiming she was abducted & an innocent paedo joking to his mates years later. In so far as evidence from the immediate time & area of the crime scene, that Madeleine was abducted, it doesn't really compare to the sighting of Gerry, & that's because the McCanns did it.

[Wonderfulspam]

Spam, it is physically impossible for someone to be in two places at once.

Gerry wasn't. It's just the times were wrong. That's the thing. You never read the statements until finally prompted.

[Wonderfulspam]

OK, describe below all the evidence that verifies the Smith sighting as Gerry.  Clue - to verify means  to make sure or demonstrate that (something) is true, accurate, or justified.

Because the McCanns did it & there's no evidence anyone else did.

[Vertigo Swirl]

What else is there?   Kate & Gerry claiming she was abducted & an innocent paedo joking to his mates years later. In so far as evidence from the immediate time & area of the crime scene, that Madeleine was abducted, it doesn't really compare to the sighting of Gerry, & that's because the McCanns did it.

So, despite the fact that you agree witness statements are unreliable, and despite the fact that it was dark and only a fleeting few seconds, and that the witness statements not only conflicted but  were given weeks and months later you still believe that on this occasion they were accurate.  Can you explain why you believe this?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Because the McCanns did it & there's no evidence anyone else did.

Your opinion does not count as verifiable evidence, please try again.