Author Topic: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?  (Read 313606 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline pegasus

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #270 on: February 27, 2016, 03:14:17 PM »
I have previously given you six independent witnesses who put the whole group away from the Tapas at the time of the Smith sighting.
Yes, what if the rush from the table is 4 minutes before the smith sighting?



« Last Edit: February 27, 2016, 04:37:34 PM by pegasus »

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #271 on: February 27, 2016, 05:11:50 PM »
I have previously given you six independent witnesses who put the whole group away from the Tapas at the time of the Smith sighting.
so the alarm was raised how much earlier than the Smith sighting according to these independent witnesses?

Offline pegasus

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #272 on: February 27, 2016, 06:20:00 PM »
If smithman was carrying missing child and came straight from apartment, he left apartment only 3 minutes before passing the irish group. It's only 375 metres. For example if smith sighting was at 10, man leaves apartment at 9.57.

Offline mercury

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #273 on: February 27, 2016, 07:22:21 PM »

Answering the OP again

- a newspaper printed that he had
- Smith was not quoted so we don't know how the newspaper knew that he had stressed he didn't think it could have been GM he saw (if indeed he did)
- if he did there is no way of knowing if he did really change his mind - perhaps he didn't want the hassle and told x y z what they wanted to hear
- its not impossible what the newspaper printed was a fabrication, history proves this and indeed, Smith has received apologies in the past for exactly this


Offline Mr Gray

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #274 on: February 27, 2016, 07:44:32 PM »
Answering the OP again

- a newspaper printed that he had
- Smith was not quoted so we don't know how the newspaper knew that he had stressed he didn't think it could have been GM he saw (if indeed he did)
- if he did there is no way of knowing if he did really change his mind - perhaps he didn't want the hassle and told x y z what they wanted to hear
- its not impossible what the newspaper printed was a fabrication, history proves this and indeed, Smith has received apologies in the past for exactly this


who cares...he didn't see the mans face anyway...and SY have ruled the mccanns out
« Last Edit: February 27, 2016, 07:51:47 PM by davel »

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #275 on: February 28, 2016, 10:08:06 AM »
If smithman was carrying missing child and came straight from apartment, he left apartment only 3 minutes before passing the irish group. It's only 375 metres. For example if smith sighting was at 10, man leaves apartment at 9.57.
What time wasthe Smith sighting?

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #276 on: February 28, 2016, 10:10:56 AM »
Yes, what if the rush from the table is 4 minutes before the smith sighting?
So they all rush to the apartment, one of them picks up a dead body and rushes away to the site of the Smith sighting with it...? &%+((£

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #277 on: February 28, 2016, 11:40:09 AM »
So they all rush to the apartment, one of them picks up a dead body and rushes away to the site of the Smith sighting with it...? &%+((£

It would have to be hidden somewhere else away from the crime scene before being moved a second time and seen by the Smiths.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Brietta

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #278 on: February 28, 2016, 11:25:55 PM »
It would have to be hidden somewhere else away from the crime scene before being moved a second time and seen by the Smiths.

He did not notice her eyes as she was asleep and her eyelids were closed.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_SMITH.htm


It was ritually important to close the eyes quickly, being that they are the first to rigidify in rigor mortis, and it was thought that a corpse with open eyes posed a threat to its kin. As has long been the case in many cultures, they used coins to keep the corpse's eyes closed. The practice of using coins endures, representing a feeling that money, so important in life, may also be important in death.
http://www.deathreference.com/Py-Se/Rigor-Mortis-and-Other-Postmortem-Changes.html#ixzz41VWOzQxg


Nothing unusual about the pale child being carried was noticed by any of the three whose statements we have read.
Suggesting that there was nothing unusual and that she was not dead as you imagine, but sleeping.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline faithlilly

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #279 on: February 28, 2016, 11:28:40 PM »
He did not notice her eyes as she was asleep and her eyelids were closed.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_SMITH.htm


It was ritually important to close the eyes quickly, being that they are the first to rigidify in rigor mortis, and it was thought that a corpse with open eyes posed a threat to its kin. As has long been the case in many cultures, they used coins to keep the corpse's eyes closed. The practice of using coins endures, representing a feeling that money, so important in life, may also be important in death.
http://www.deathreference.com/Py-Se/Rigor-Mortis-and-Other-Postmortem-Changes.html#ixzz41VWOzQxg


Nothing unusual about the pale child being carried was noticed by any of the three whose statements we have read.
Suggesting that there was nothing unusual and that she was not dead as you imagine, but sleeping.

Tell me Brietta how you would know the difference ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #280 on: February 28, 2016, 11:59:44 PM »
He did not notice her eyes as she was asleep and her eyelids were closed.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_SMITH.htm


It was ritually important to close the eyes quickly, being that they are the first to rigidify in rigor mortis, and it was thought that a corpse with open eyes posed a threat to its kin. As has long been the case in many cultures, they used coins to keep the corpse's eyes closed. The practice of using coins endures, representing a feeling that money, so important in life, may also be important in death.
http://www.deathreference.com/Py-Se/Rigor-Mortis-and-Other-Postmortem-Changes.html#ixzz41VWOzQxg


Nothing unusual about the pale child being carried was noticed by any of the three whose statements we have read.
Suggesting that there was nothing unusual and that she was not dead as you imagine, but sleeping.

Common sense dear. If they couldn't see his face clearly in the dark then they wouldn't notice her tiny eyelids.  The child's eyes would be facing down on his shoulder and in the opposite direction when he was heading towards them.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline misty

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #281 on: February 29, 2016, 12:25:36 AM »
Common sense dear. If they couldn't see his face clearly in the dark then they wouldn't notice her tiny eyelids.  The child's eyes would be facing down on his shoulder and in the opposite direction when he was heading towards them.

One wonders how any of them saw her eyes at all, as her hair had probably flopped forward, covering most of the side of her face.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #282 on: February 29, 2016, 12:32:03 AM »
One wonders how any of them saw her eyes at all, as her hair had probably flopped forward, covering most of the side of her face.

They didn't need to see her eyes to know she was out for the count.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline misty

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #283 on: February 29, 2016, 12:36:57 AM »
They didn't need to see her eyes to know she was out for the count.

Two of them said they saw her eyelids closed. Why say that if they were merely making an assumption from the child's body position?

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #284 on: February 29, 2016, 07:28:35 AM »
Two of them said they saw her eyelids closed. Why say that if they were merely making an assumption from the child's body position?

That would have to be confirmed but it's obvious to know the difference.

"She appeared to be sleeping. Her arms were suspended along her body and were not around the individual's neck. She did not see the child's face because she was lying against the individual's left shoulder in a vertical position against the individual." AS
« Last Edit: February 29, 2016, 07:32:54 AM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.