Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?

[Brietta]

but we've established that there were a total of 15 minutes over two time slots during which an abduction could have taken place, and the Met have verified that there WAS an opportunity in the timeline for an abduction, so far from impossible.

  ... and it would only have taken a very few minutes of either of those fifteen minute gaps for an intruder to enter the premises and leave carrying Madeleine.

[Alfred R Jones]

What additional people would you need for a cover-up ?

A young child being abducted from her bed while on holiday is deeply improbable. In fact so deeply improbable that supporters have yet to give this forum one example of this happening before, yet still you believe it. So what's the difference ?

the "on holiday" bit has no bearing on the likelihood or otherwise of an abduction from a house or home.  It has happened before and examples have been posted on this forum.

[Alfred R Jones]

Gerry could have said hes popping to the loo....who times it?

none of the t7 had to be " in on it"

Faithlilly has JT in on it at the very least, and has just claimed that a number of the Tapas group were prepared to vouch for Gerry's wherabouts at the time of the alarm, and G-Unit concluded that they had colluded to set the alarm at 10pm.

[Alfred R Jones]

There is no logic to Faithlilly's theory, yet there is cruel plausibility and precedent to the concept of a child being stolen from an unlocked dwelling by an abuser.

[sadie]

He is definitely under 6 ft.

Deleted, because I cant be sure, but I dont think that is Gerry.

Gerry has a broadish chest and good shoulders.

[sadie]

why is it ludicrous?  I'll tell you why it's ludicrous.  Some would have us believe that the father of the missing child carried her DEAD BODY uncovered, with no disguise to himself, through a holiday town during opening hours to find a hiding place for the body, whilst simultaneously his wife was screaming "abduction".  The same father, the next day after having supposedly been seen by NINE individuals carrying his child's DEAD BODY then goes on TV to be broadcast to the 4 corners of the earth to highlight her disappearance, and subsequently becomes one of the most recognisable men in the world at the time.  Is that ludicrous enough for you, or not so much?

Good post Alfie   

[mercury]

Faithlilly has JT in on it at the very least, and has just claimed that a number of the Tapas group were prepared to vouch for Gerry's wherabouts at the time of the alarm, and G-Unit concluded that they had colluded to set the alarm at 10pm.

Faith and others have their own theories, theres no crime in that, what we are discussing is who definitely places GM at the Tapas Bar at exactly the tme the alarm was raised...not much if anythng at all there

[mercury]

Bwhahah

which one is supposed to be Gerry?  The narrow shoulderd and narrow chested one?  LOL


Come on PFinder, you can't expect us to fall for that one !!!

Its so obviously number *89 but my apologies as youve said your eyesight is not too good

[pegasus]

... which one ...?

As Merc says, it's Number **9 Sadie.

[G-Unit]

Bwhahah

which one is supposed to be Gerry?  The narrow shoulderd and narrow chested one?  LOL


Come on PFinder, you can't expect us to fall for that one !!!

I spotted him immediately and I haven't met him. Second from left! I thought you were the expert at recognising people (well Madeleine anyway).

[pegasus]

Behind car wearing a fake George V beard?

[mercury]

Behind car wearing a fake George V beard?

No car wears a fake beard, but yeah that bloke..dead ringer for george v
And the bloke in thr front with anorexic arms is from some 70s disco group


 *&*%£


Oh my days, my bed time

[pegasus]

No car wears a fake beard, but yeah that bloke..dead ringed


 *&*%£


Oh my days

Yes I meant the man not the car Merc please try to be serious.
Here's another recognition test - off topic so moved to
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7060.msg314031#msg314031

[pathfinder73]

Faithlilly has JT in on it at the very least, and has just claimed that a number of the Tapas group were prepared to vouch for Gerry's wherabouts at the time of the alarm, and G-Unit concluded that they had colluded to set the alarm at 10pm.

No collusion was necessary. From each rog except Jane who wasn't there.

"Gerry said or Kate said, it's about thirty minutes since the last check, we ought to go, so that's why I think it's thirty minutes."

"Because you see within seconds it was, you know, everybody split up and did a quick, quick search in a different direction'.

"Again I wasn’t looking at the time but just thinking to what happened is that err Russell came back to table and err they’d actually cooked him a fresh steak and he was just starting to tuck into it when err Kate had obviously gone back to check on the children, came running in you know, as far as I can recollect she said you know she’s gone, Gerry, Madeleine’s gone, screaming you know.” i.e. doesn't know the time!

"‘I think it would have been about ten o’clock’, I didn’t have a watch." i.e. doesn't know the time!

"he was eating his dinner and Kate said that she you know was, must have been about five to ten then or ten o'clock, so Kate said you know, she'd go up and check, do her check and within a couple of minutes later she came back and shouting Madeleines gone." i.e. doesn't know the time!

"Kate left, I hadn't realised that she'd, you know, left the table again just busy chatting, then Kate came back just after ten o' clock, you know absolutely distraught err you know just, you know her face I'll never forget. It was a face of someone's child who had been taken and you know and very clearly said she's gone, she's you know, she's gone, you know and there was a disbelief on our face you know ah you know you must be mistaken, what, and then you know just looking at her we just all err left the table, rushed over to her and as we were walking up towards the flat she said err you know they've taken her and it was, you know, and I know there's been a controversy about what was actually said but you know that is very accurately what had been said." Claims to know the time. Guess who  &%+((£

[sadie]

I spotted him immediately and I haven't met him. Second from left! I thought you were the expert at recognising people (well Madeleine anyway).

Yep, made the same mistake as I did before.  I honed in on the center of the picture and took no notice of the outer part.  Maybe that is because of my eyesight problems, periferal vision weak?  Dunno

I see who you all mean.  When was that taken? ... and what event was that?


And now i am off to bed

Nigh night.