Author Topic: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?  (Read 292166 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #885 on: March 13, 2016, 09:16:38 PM »
Reread your original post to me on evidential reliability and evidence

I haven't made an original post on evidential  reliability...the thread is re smith man...

Offline mercury

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #886 on: March 13, 2016, 09:17:30 PM »
No, it doesn't.

Unless you think Martin Smith would have produced an efit of a man he was 60 to 80% sure was Gerry.

Which is absurd ....

shall we not do groundhog day again and again and again? It must be  weary for the soul lol

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #887 on: March 13, 2016, 09:18:58 PM »
shall we not do groundhog day again and again and again? It must be  weary for the soul lol

Would he?

And if so, why?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #888 on: March 13, 2016, 09:19:41 PM »
Would he?

And if so, why?

how can you produce an e fit of a face you admit you did not see

Offline mercury

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #889 on: March 13, 2016, 09:19:58 PM »
I haven't made an original post on evidential  reliability...the thread is re smith man...

Are you slow or playing dumb? Your post 871 as i said about evidential reliablity, made to ME!

actually dont worry, im bored of you already



Offline mercury

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #890 on: March 13, 2016, 09:20:52 PM »
Would he?

And if so, why?

So you enjoy groundhog day, have fun

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #891 on: March 13, 2016, 09:29:59 PM »
how can you produce an e fit of a face you admit you did not see

I don't place much store on the PJ reports, not because I have disrespect for the officers who took them, but because they were taken in reported form, delivered in one language, translated into another, then re-translated back into English and in the form we (finally) read on line.

I believe 'Watcher' on Amazon has the low-down on the technology that can be used for the production of efits as detailed as those produced by the Smiths.

How good it is (at enabling eye-witnesses to produce images that lead to identification of their subjects) I have no idea.

But Watcher suggests that's what they used.

She may be right.

I've no idea.

Perhaps the efits are, ultimately, not very useful (in helping to identify anyone named).

But they are the best shots, of an honest couple, both desperate to assist efforts to identify and nail the abductors of Madeleine, the best way they can.

We should applaud their efforts (I think) .....

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #892 on: March 13, 2016, 09:31:08 PM »
Are you slow or playing dumb? Your post 871 as i said about evidential reliablity, made to ME!

actually dont worry, im bored of you already

871 doesn't mention evidential reliability.......someone is certainly dumb and slow

Offline mercury

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #893 on: March 13, 2016, 09:35:30 PM »
871 doesn't mention evidential reliability.......someone is certainly dumb and slow

Ah yes it mentioned "evidential evidence"

 @)(++(*

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #894 on: March 13, 2016, 09:37:14 PM »
Ah yes it mentioned "evidential evidence"

 @)(++(*

dumb and slow were the words you used

Offline mercury

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #895 on: March 13, 2016, 09:38:19 PM »
dumb and slow were the words you used

I asked you if you were slow or playng dumb in answer to a post whch was clear, that is not the same as calling you dumb and slow, pls dont twist, its dishonest

And evidential evidence is the oxymoron you used
« Last Edit: March 13, 2016, 09:42:09 PM by mercury »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #896 on: March 13, 2016, 09:41:48 PM »
And evidential evidence is the oxymoron you used

I was quoting you from one of your now removed posts

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #897 on: March 13, 2016, 09:42:20 PM »
I don't place much store on the PJ reports, not because I have disrespect for the officers who took them, but because they were taken in reported form, delivered in one language, translated into another, then re-translated back into English and in the form we (finally) read on line.

I believe 'Watcher' on Amazon has the low-down on the technology that can be used for the production of efits as detailed as those produced by the Smiths.

How good it is (at enabling eye-witnesses to produce images that lead to identification of their subjects) I have no idea.

But Watcher suggests that's what they used.

She may be right.

I've no idea.

Perhaps the efits are, ultimately, not very useful (in helping to identify anyone named).

But they are the best shots, of an honest couple, both desperate to assist efforts to identify and nail the abductors of Madeleine, the best way they can.

We should applaud their efforts (I think) .....

The McCanns spent 100K to get the files translated. If that was paid by the fund they should be released.

"Gonçalo Amaral went on air on CMTV to say Gerry McCann had also been seen on the beach on the night Madeleine went missing - but that the witness who placed him there (a British tourist) had her testimony wiped from police records."
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline mercury

Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #898 on: March 13, 2016, 09:44:25 PM »
I was quoting you from one of your now removed posts

Oh really, nice try, as pathetic as your squirming and avoiding, par for the course

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?
« Reply #899 on: March 13, 2016, 09:45:44 PM »
The McCanns spent 100K to get the files translated. If that was paid by the fund they should be released.

"Gonçalo Amaral went on air on CMTV to say Gerry McCann had also been seen on the beach on the night Madeleine went missing - but that the witness who placed him there (a British tourist) had her testimony wiped from police records."

No clue what you are driving at.

.....