Katie Hopkins - "I think it's finally time to speak out".

[Alice Purjorick]

I do recall a discussion about Madeleine on one of the "sceptic" sites in which her looks were pulled apart, something to the effect of "it's probably just as well she's dead otherwise she'd have grown up to look just like her Dad, poor kid".  I'm sure there's been other stuff too,

I could recall all sorts of things. I was rather hoping the expert debaters could come up with a cite or two.
Not "oh I read it somewhere I fink".

[Alfred R Jones]

Strange how it wasn't alright to leave it to the PJ, it wasn't alright to leave Colin Stagg to the police, yet for some reason we shouldn't question SY, OG or the McCanns.

"We are not the police. We cannot pretend to know what really went on" - Katie Hopkins.  Do you disagree with delightful Katie?

[Alfred R Jones]

I could recall all sorts of things. I was rather hoping the expert debaters could come up with a cite or two.
Not "oh I read it somewhere I fink".

Oh I'm sure there's a screen shot of it somewhere, but I'm not the sort to collect them.  Maybe someone else will help you out, as you seem very eager to read the bile against Madeleine.

[stephen25000]

Oh I'm sure there's a screen shot of it somewhere, but I'm not the sort to collect them.  Maybe someone else will help you out, as you seem very eager to read the bile against Madeleine.

What bile has there been against Madeleine on here or in the Mail comments ?

[Alice Purjorick]

Oh I'm sure there's a screen shot of it somewhere, but I'm not the sort to collect them.  Maybe someone else will help you out, as you seem very eager to read the bile against Madeleine.

Not really, I was questioning it's very existence. No one has posted anything yet so maybe it is a figment of overly fertile imaginations.

[Brietta]

Why won't you criticize the mccanns for what they failed to do.

How about her calling a police officer merely doing his job a 'f#####g t####r' or the mccanns calling other officers 'tweedledum  and tweedledee' ?

      Very impressive dossier there.

 

After nine years you have managed to come up with 'tweedledum  and tweedledee' and an expression which in retrospect was not only appropriate when used but proved to be remarkably prescient in the light of subsequent events.

Ms Hopkins was certainly a bit more inventive than that.

[stephen25000]

      Very impressive dossier there.

 

After nine years you have managed to come up with 'tweedledum  and tweedledee' and an expression which in retrospect was not only appropriate when used but proved to be remarkably prescient in the light of subsequent events.

Ms Hopkins was certainly a bit more inventive than that.

Actually the two descriptions given by either one or both of the mccanns could easily be turned inwards.

I note you are unable to criticise either of the pair whose less than masterful skills initiated events that led to the disappearance of their daughter.

Could you explain why you never put the blame where it lies ?

Or are you too 1-dimensional to accept the mccanns are responsible for their actions ?

[Brietta]

Actually the two descriptions given by either one or both of the mccanns could easily be turned inwards.

I note you are unable to criticise either of the pair whose less than masterful skills initiated events that led to the disappearance of their daughter.

Could you explain why you never put the blame where it lies ?

Or are you too 1-dimensional to accept the mccanns are responsible for their actions ?

I always put the blame for Madeleine's disappearance exactly where it lies ... and that is entirely the responsibility of the criminal who abducted her.

Neither you or Ms Hopkins seem too concerned about that ... although she at least recognises that there was a kidnapping and therefore an abductor.

Are all criminals blameless in your eyes ... or only the one in particular who must have caused unimaginable pain to the McCann family and the child s/he stole from all that she knew and loved?

[stephen25000]

I always put the blame for Madeleine's disappearance exactly where it lies ... and that is entirely the responsibility of the criminal who abducted her.

Neither you or Ms Hopkins seem too concerned about that ... although she at least recognises that there was a kidnapping and therefore an abductor.

Are all criminals blameless in your eyes ... or only the one in particular who must have caused unimaginable pain to the McCann family and the child s/he stole from all that she knew and loved?

Your reply was expected.

The crime is unknown, if any occurred.

Abduction is one scenario and without one critical factor, EVIDENCE.

You as I predicted are incapable of accepting the mccanns part in what led to their disappearance of their daughter.

Your responses merely reinforce the commonly held perception, that you only care for the mccanns.

As for the real tweedledum and tweedledee in this case, one only has to go back to one night in May.

IMHO naturally.

[Brietta]

Your reply was expected.

The crime is unknown, if any occurred.

Abduction is one scenario and without one critical factor, EVIDENCE.

You as I predicted are incapable of accepting the mccanns part in what led to their disappearance of their daughter.

Your responses merely reinforce the commonly held perception, that you only care for the mccanns.

As for the real tweedledum and tweedledee in this case, one only has to go back to one night in May.

IMHO naturally.

The case isn't about me.  It isn't about Ms Hopkins who has alighted on an easy earner for herself.  It isn't even about you.

It is all about a little girl who was stolen from her family.
I for one see nothing wrong in hoping for the best for her ... if that fails to meet with your approval, I am quite unconcerned.

[stephen25000]

The case isn't about me.  It isn't about Ms Hopkins who has alighted on an easy earner for herself.  It isn't even about you.

It is all about a little girl who was stolen from her family.
I for one see nothing wrong in hoping for the best for her ... if that fails to meet with your approval, I am quite unconcerned.

It has not been determined how Madeleine disappeared.

What is disturbing is your refusal to accept the mccanns have some responsibility in what happened.

Your bombastic posting style emphasises that you only feel sympathy for the mccanns themselves.

[mercury]

The case isn't about me.  It isn't about Ms Hopkins who has alighted on an easy earner for herself. 

What's she earning then? Does she get commission for every person who reads her article? And why wait nine years to do so if that is her motive?

[Brietta]

What's she earning then? Does she get commission for every person who reads her article? And why wait nine years to do so if that is her motive?

She didn't wait for nine years.

[mercury]

She didn't wait for nine years.

I know she has made the odd twitter post now and then , I was asking about her "earning"...the impression you gave was that she was making money out of her comments! As far as I can see she has read the papers for years and years, made the odd comment and for SOME reason has been a lot more expressive right now, money doesn't come into it

End of the day she's made her opinion known, she's had massive support on the issue, she could have been anyone, not many people like her and her antics me included, but she's said nothing that will land her in court like some rabids think, yawn

[mercury]

      Very impressive dossier there.

 

After nine years you have managed to come up with 'tweedledum  and tweedledee' and an expression which in retrospect was not only appropriate when used but proved to be remarkably prescient in the light of subsequent events.

Ms Hopkins was certainly a bit more inventive than that.

Nice pic of Gerry and Clarence