Author Topic: Slarti's Simple Solution.  (Read 77232 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Slarti's Simple Solution.
« Reply #195 on: February 26, 2016, 11:06:31 PM »
Or else you have failed to understand the simplest of posts

then explain  it to me in the context of my post...you will not be able to so perhaps you should step away from the keyboard

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Slarti's Simple Solution.
« Reply #196 on: February 26, 2016, 11:08:14 PM »
They can always move away from the keyboard.

same to you...can you explain what you mean in the context of my post or perhaps you should step away from the keyboard

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Slarti's Simple Solution.
« Reply #197 on: February 26, 2016, 11:10:03 PM »
same to you...can you explain what you mean in the context of my post or perhaps you should step away from the keyboard

You are a wit.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Online misty

Re: Slarti's Simple Solution.
« Reply #198 on: February 26, 2016, 11:10:59 PM »
It would be super'helpful to  new posters if all those 10000+ superfluous posts saying "no evidence of abduction"
could be removed before suggesting a complete catch-up.
 

Offline mercury

Re: Slarti's Simple Solution.
« Reply #199 on: February 26, 2016, 11:11:19 PM »
then explain  it to me in the context of my post...you will not be able to so perhaps you should step away from the keyboard

Jesus this so laborious but I'm a charitable person

You posted posters may not want to post on things already discussed ..Slartibartfast posted, they could move away from keyboard...that's it!!!

Total sense


Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Slarti's Simple Solution.
« Reply #200 on: February 26, 2016, 11:11:25 PM »
Kate lied, I suspect. I do not know why. Same as I don't know why the story of firstly using a key.. which transformed into no key but entering via unlocked door..came about. But thats a lie somewhere along the line, not just a mistake.

I see no reason why Madeleine would open the window. Don't even know if she could as some of those blind things are difficult even for an adult.
Incredible.  You seem to be moving further away from Occam's Razor with every post you make!

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Slarti's Simple Solution.
« Reply #201 on: February 26, 2016, 11:12:16 PM »
Not quite understanding why thats classed as a controversial opinion tbh, nor why its fine to ask questions but not to post before reading over the entire forum. Some odd rules you have here..it would take me months to read through everything that has been posted so far. even if I did read everything, my opinion would be the same I assume, so the same post would be made, just at a later date.

And thanks Mercury for the welcome  8(0(*

Welcome Vicky.
I guess by now you have figured out it don't take too long to run the tape over a lot  of 'em here  8(>((
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline mercury

Re: Slarti's Simple Solution.
« Reply #202 on: February 26, 2016, 11:13:06 PM »
It would be super'helpful to  new posters if all those 10000+ superfluous posts saying "no evidence of abduction"
could be removed before suggesting a complete catch-up.

Did you count them? Tut tut, I'm sure there are 10000 or more that canbe ignored with other themes!!!

Offline Vicky

Re: Slarti's Simple Solution.
« Reply #203 on: February 26, 2016, 11:14:20 PM »
Incredible.  You seem to be moving further away from Occam's Razor with every post you make!
By suggesting that Kate lied about something? Is that really such a leap, given the key/unlocked door scenario which proves random lies did occur?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Slarti's Simple Solution.
« Reply #204 on: February 26, 2016, 11:14:29 PM »
Jesus this so laborious but I'm a charitable person

You posted posters may not want to post on things already discussed ..Slartibartfast posted, they could move away from keyboard...that's it!!!

Total sense

nonsense

perhaps you should read the post again and comment on what I actually said rather than what you think I said

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Slarti's Simple Solution.
« Reply #205 on: February 26, 2016, 11:16:18 PM »
By suggesting that Kate lied about something? Is that really such a leap, given the key/unlocked door scenario which proves random lies did occur?

I dont believe kate lied to the police...but we have been through this a million times before

Offline Vicky

Re: Slarti's Simple Solution.
« Reply #206 on: February 26, 2016, 11:17:02 PM »
Great. We don't need to agree on everything :)

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Slarti's Simple Solution.
« Reply #207 on: February 26, 2016, 11:17:49 PM »
By suggesting that Kate lied about something? Is that really such a leap, given the key/unlocked door scenario which proves random lies did occur?
Random lies to what end, if the child woke and wandered?

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Slarti's Simple Solution.
« Reply #208 on: February 26, 2016, 11:21:06 PM »
You get back to your apartment and discover a child is missing from their bed. It's obvious to you that they probably woke up and wandered out to look for you, so you immediately decide to stage an abduction because...?

Offline mercury

Re: Slarti's Simple Solution.
« Reply #209 on: February 26, 2016, 11:24:35 PM »
nonsense

perhaps you should read the post again and comment on what I actually said rather than what you think I said

I didnt have to think at all.....it was perfectly clear....perhaps you should retread what you said and what the reply was which makes total sense
YOU:
you are free to post anything you like within the forum rules but as this case is 9 years old you should understand posters may not want to post at length on things that have been discussed many times
SLARTIBARTFAST:
They can always move away from the keyboard.

To which you replied that as usual Slartibartfast made no sense
« Last Edit: February 26, 2016, 11:57:54 PM by mercury »