Katie Hopkins labels sex abuse victim 'a slag'!

[Brietta]

You are bit slow on the uptake here old stick. Appealing to me like will not work. I don't have a conscience did you not realise?

             I don't find you in the least appealing ... why do you suppose you are my target audience?

[carlymichelle]

As usual the 'disgusted of Tunbridge Wells' brigade have gone overboard with hyperbole and accusations. No-one here has defended this stupid footballer. No-one here has accused the girl of being anything but a stupid teenager. All anyone has said is that pedophile is not the correct term to use for this man. Shock horror! Really?

lets face it if katie  hadent done the article    about the mcanns   mcann supporters wouldnt care  less about this teen

[stephen25000]

             I don't find you in the least appealing ... why do you suppose you are my target audience?

So your target audience is gullible people who believe in abduction.

[carlymichelle]

So your target audience is gullible people who believe in abduction.

katies article   about the  mcanns  upset the mcann supporters alot more then they have let on  imo

[stephen25000]

katies article   about the  mcanns  upset the mcann supporters alot more then they have let on  imo

Indeed Carly. They tried to maintain the illusion that the mccanns have popular backing, and the comments in the Mail as regards the mccanns, failed comprehensively to show that.

[Alice Purjorick]

             I don't find you in the least appealing ... why do you suppose you are my target audience?

You replied to my post in error then.

[Alice Purjorick]

As usual the 'disgusted of Tunbridge Wells' brigade have gone overboard with hyperbole and accusations. No-one here has defended this stupid footballer. No-one here has accused the girl of being anything but a stupid teenager. All anyone has said is that pedophile is not the correct term to use for this man. Shock horror! Really?

It has been entertaining if somewhat predictable.

[Alfred R Jones]

As usual the 'disgusted of Tunbridge Wells' brigade have gone overboard with hyperbole and accusations. No-one here has defended this stupid footballer. No-one here has accused the girl of being anything but a stupid teenager. All anyone has said is that pedophile is not the correct term to use for this man. Shock horror! Really?

Someone here, ie you, has agreed with Katie Hopkins that the victim in this case is a slag and that the footballer should never been prosecuted - or have I misunderstood your support for Katie's views?

[G-Unit]

Someone here, ie you, has agreed with Katie Hopkins that the victim in this case is a slag and that the footballer should never been prosecuted - or have I misunderstood your support for Katie's views?

If you read my posts you may realise that they were all about one thing which Katie Hopkins said;

he’s not a paedophile

I have not said that the girl is a slag or that Johnson shouldn't have been prosecuted. I have also tried to initiate a realistic discussion about 'childhood and the problems with legal definitions of when it ends.

So yes, once again you have misunderstood what my position is. I understand why, too. It's so much easier to lambast someone if you ignore what they actually said and vilify them for what you imagine they said.

[Alfred R Jones]

If you read my posts you may realise that they were all about one thing which Katie Hopkins said;

he’s not a paedophile

I have not said that the girl is a slag or that Johnson shouldn't have been prosecuted. I have also tried to initiate a realistic discussion about 'childhood and the problems with legal definitions of when it ends.

So yes, once again you have misunderstood what my position is. I understand why, too. It's so much easier to lambast someone if you ignore what they actually said and vilify them for what you imagine they said.

You informed us yesterday that you agreed with Katie Hopkins. Katie Hopkins article explicity refers to the victim as a slag and her opinion is that the footballer should never have been prosecuted.  Perhaps you should have been a little more discerning about which bits of Hopkins vile views you agreed with and which you did not in order to avoid misunderstanding.

So, just to be clear - do you think the victim in this case is a slag?
Should the court have considered the victim to be a woman not a child?
Do you think the case should have come to court at all?
Also:
Do you think it is right that the footballer, having been found guilty of sex with a child has been placed on the sex offenders register?

[stephen25000]

You informed us yesterday that you agreed with Katie Hopkins. Katie Hopkins article explicity refers to the victim as a slag and her opinion is that the footballer should never have been prosecuted.  Perhaps you should have been a little more discerning about which bits of Hopkins vile views you agreed with and which you did not in order to avoid misunderstanding.

So, just to be clear - do you think the victim in this case is a slag?
Should the court have considered the victim to be a woman not a child?
Do you think the case should have come to court at all?
Also:
Do you think it is right that the footballer, having been found guilty of sex with a child has been placed on the sex offenders register?

Why are you so obsessed by Katie Hopkins ?

Is it merely because she denigrated your believed mccanns ?

[Alfred R Jones]

Why are you so obsessed by Katie Hopkins ?

Is it merely because she denigrated your believed mccanns ?

I'm not obsessed by Katie Hopkins. It's called "having an online debate" - if you don't like it, don't read it.

[G-Unit]

You informed us yesterday that you agreed with Katie Hopkins. Katie Hopkins article explicity refers to the victim as a slag and her opinion is that the footballer should never have been prosecuted.  Perhaps you should have been a little more discerning about which bits of Hopkins vile views you agreed with and which you did not in order to avoid misunderstanding.

So, just to be clear - do you think the victim in this case is a slag?  I have said she's a foolish girl.
Should the court have considered the victim to be a woman not a child? I have pointed out that the only reason she is defined as a child is geography. It would be nice if the law distinguished between children and adolescents as that would be more realistic.
Do you think the case should have come to court at all? Clearly the law as it stands has been broken, so yes.
Also:
Do you think it is right that the footballer, having been found guilty of sex with a child has been placed on the sex offenders register? A sexual offense has been committed, so yes.

[jassi]

I would expect that to be the position of any sensible person.

[G-Unit]

Some people find Katie Hopkins views beyond the pale. Is she so different from others writing for the UK media though? Their views, which were often libelous, have attracted no criticism whatsoever by these same outraged upholders of what is right and reasonable;
http://newsoutlines.blogspot.co.uk/2010/01/adjectives-used-by-british-press-to.html