Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?

[misty]

IMO not because this item in pile is manufactured from white or off-white fabric (not blue).
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=7097.0;attach=6238;image
green outline has been added to show which item, so please see original PJ photo in files is better.
A start is to ask is the fabric plain, or does it have a design, and if so is it checks, or stripes, or ...?

OK. The item at 1.01.29 on the dogs video which Eddie is standing over but not alerting to? Possibly a pair of toddler pyjama bottoms.

[ferryman]

So (in English law!) we've had an instance of where a child-minder (of all people) forgot about a child in her charge for several hours, but because there was no evidence of mens rai (guilty mind) neither was there an offence committed (no intent to cause harm).

In Portugal, the McCanns certainly never forgot about their children, checked them regularly (perhaps not as regularly as the Portuguese prosecutors would have liked, but certainly regularly enough to comply with the requirements of Portuguese (and seemingly, also, English) law. 

There is zero evidence that either McCann (or any of their friends) did anything, directly, to harm Madeleine.

So what excuses do McCann-detractors have left to denigrate the McCanns?

[jassi]

Who needs an excuse?

[ferryman]

Who needs an excuse?

In the absence of legitimate reason, excuse is all that's left.

[faithlilly]

So (in English law!) we've had an instance of where a child-minder (of all people) forgot about a child in her charge for several hours, but because there was no evidence of mens rai (guilty mind) neither was there an offence committed (no intent to cause harm).

In Portugal, the McCanns certainly never forgot about their children, checked them regularly (perhaps not as regularly as the Portuguese prosecutors would have liked, but certainly regularly enough to comply with the requirements of Portuguese (and seemingly, also, English) law. 

There is zero evidence that either McCann (or any of their friends) did anything, directly, to harm Madeleine.

So what excuses do McCann-detractors have left to denigrate the McCanns?

Do you mean mens rea ?

[Eleanor]

Do you mean mens rea ?

I would think so.  Wouldn't you?

[mercury]

I use one of those to get rid of the smell of dog pee on my mat.  But joking aside, permanent Cadaver Odour is a Myth.  Especially three months later.

Its been scenifically proven that it lasts not only at least three months (carpet squares study) and up to 14 months (residual scent in buildings study) both discussed ad infinitum on here for years eleanor...so u cleaning your pooches pee which is not cadaver scent btw is not a good example of "odourless"

Anyway hey? Just filling you in case youd frgotten those timngs, besides , police wouldnt waste their resources sending dogs in when they did imo

[mercury]

In Portugal, the McCanns certainly never forgot about their children, checked them regularly (perhaps not as regularly as the Portuguese prosecutors would have liked, but certainly regularly enough to comply with the requirements of Portuguese and seemingly, also, English) law. 

There is zero evidence that either McCann (or any of their friends) did anything, directly, to harm Madeleine.

So what excuses do McCann-detractors have left to denigrate the McCanns?

Seemingly being the operative word and you know for a fact these days police swoop on parents whose kids were left in a car for even two minutes .....to back up yur argument you would have to quote a case where the parents or carers left the kids ( toddlers) for half hour stretches, in unlocked flat,one went missing, and it would be considered by them "responsible care".

[mercury]

IMO just above the tshirt Eleanor and are here coloured solid grey as guide for when you look at original PJ photo.

I dont think you are going to get anywhere much with these photos they are to fuzzy and colours and shapes compromised

Imo

But if you think the clothes were contamnated, what by?

[pegasus]

It's a patterned fabric, not striped, not a regular check. I can't really  make out if the pattern is on a white background
or not- enhancing colour & enlarging doesn't really help and the article could be crumpled up.

It's easier to see on the original PJ image. IMO that item is off-white fabric on which is printed a design of small pastelly coloured dots Misty, a bit like ...

[pegasus]

I dont think you are going to get anywhere much with these photos they are to fuzzy and colours and shapes compromised

Imo

But if you think the clothes were contamnated, what by?

Possibly by being adjacent to something Merc?

[mercury]

Possibly by being adjacent to something Merc?

Obviously lol but i was asking for the physical  primary source in other words the orignal from a body

[misty]

It's easier to see on the original PJ image. IMO that item is off-white fabric on which is printed a design of small pastelly coloured dots Misty, a bit like ...

It's quite a large piece of clothing, Pegasus as it extends under the trousers - I'm looking at the blue above.....
not believing it is A's jacket....still scouring all the photos.

[misty]

@Pegasus

I think the item is too large to be the pyjama bottoms.......and the markings wrong....so please continue..

[misty]

How about this if you thinks it's polka dots?

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccanns-little-brother-promises-127306