You do realise don't you Brietta that this story originated in the same publication who stated categorically, on their front page that Liverpool supporters urinated on the bodies of the dead at Hillsborough ?
The Sun's Hillsborough source has never been a secret - it was the policeRoy GreensladeMonday 17 October 2011 08.45 BST
**snip
The ITN clip is crucial because it shows just where the families should concentrate their fire. The South Yorkshire force had a motive - to distract attention from its own failings, as highlighted by Taylor - and the opportunity to brief journalists off the record.
All the newspapers, news agencies, TV and radio outlets, relied entirely on the police for the reporting of scandalous and inaccurate allegations.
The Sun's sin was to believe them.
http://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2011/oct/17/sun-hillsborough-disasterThe South Yorkshire police went on the attack and used the press to cover their own incompetence and mismanagement by getting in first with the most lying and pejorative portrayal of the victims of Hillsborough as possible.
In a similar way the press was used against the McCanns in Portugal from 'A Badly Told Story' to '100% DNA' where it appears the police just simply had not a clue about how to conduct a missing child inquiry and embarked on their own cover up.
Instead of dismissing out of hand the open window and the McCann's belief that Madeleine had been abducted ... why wasn't it investigated.
Whether the interrupted burglars story is a rehash of a previous story or not ... have you ever reflected on why it wasn't thoroughly checked out in 2007.
It must have been known that burglars were active in the immediate area and within Block 5.
We know that the PJ must have been aware of home invasions when children were assaulted as DNA had been recovered.
Did Mr Amaral check it out ... or was he too busy looking for a blue sports bag, a pink blanket and a freezer?