The Sun claims Madeleine McCann was kidnapped during a botched burglary.

[G-Unit]

Well you love the comments section.

That could be because most of the comments disagree with The Sun's views, of course.

[Benice]

After all the 'sun' is the bastion of the truth, justice and having paid the mccanns serialization rights for a certain book.

Very nice.

And yet very recently you posted a link to the Sun as evidence to back up a claim.

Double standards?

[stephen25000]

And yet very recently you posted a link to the Sun as evidence to back up a claim.

Double standards?

Remind me of the purpose of the link.

[Alfie]

Perhaps there should be a new forum rule that, as with blogs by anonymous authors, all newspaper articles should be banned, seeing as how only muppets would take anything they say as being worthy of discussion.  Which leaves us only with - what?  The Files and....?

[stephen25000]

Perhaps there should be a new forum rule that, as with blogs by anonymous authors, all newspaper articles should be banned, seeing as how only muppets would take anything they say as being worthy of discussion.  Which leaves us only with - what?  The Files and....?

Oh how drole, and all because the comments pages in the newspapers reflect attitudes to the mccanns.

[faithlilly]

Perhaps there should be a new forum rule that, as with blogs by anonymous authors, all newspaper articles should be banned, seeing as how only muppets would take anything they say as being worthy of discussion.  Which leaves us only with - what?  The Files and....?

Live interviews ?

[Benice]

Remind me of the purpose of the link.

Here is your post - you even emphasize that the link had been posted before.   Why would you post that link if you didn't think it was a credible cite from a reliable source?

Quote
Do keep up.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/7115564/Revealed-The-reason-Kate-and-Gerry-werent-charged-over-Madeleine-McCanns-disappearance.html

AND TAKE NOTE.

This link and others have been provided before.
End quote

Now you appear to be sneering at the very idea that the Sun is a credible source.

Therefore  - double standards IMO.

[Alfie]

Live interviews ?

Haha, you mean like when Andy Redwood said live on TV that neither the McCanns nor any of their friends were suspects or persons of interest which really meant that they were?

[stephen25000]

Here is your post - you even emphasize that the link had been posted before.   Why would you post that link if you didn't think it was a credible cite from a reliable source?

Quote
Do keep up.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/7115564/Revealed-The-reason-Kate-and-Gerry-werent-charged-over-Madeleine-McCanns-disappearance.html

AND TAKE NOTE.

This link and others have been provided before.
End quote

Now you appear to be sneering at the very idea that the Sun is a credible source.

Therefore  - double standards IMO.

Need I remind you Benice, that the article was run in MOST of the UK papers, or has that escaped your attention.

So you were saying..................

Besides the comments pages in all those papers that ran the story speak volumes about the lack of support for the Mccanns.

I'm sure you will agree on that.

[stephen25000]

..and just for you Benice.

As a reminder of course.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3565461/Madeleine-McCann-s-parents-not-prosecuted-Portuguese-police-believed-leaving-children-meal-English-custom.html

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/511619/Portuguese-minister-reveals-charge-Maddie-McCann-parents-compassion-abandonment-prosecutor

[Benice]

Need I remind you Benice, that the article was run in MOST of the UK papers, or has that escaped your attention.

So you were saying..................

Besides the comments pages in all those papers that ran the story speak volumes about the lack of support for the Mccanns.

I'm sure you will agree on that.

What has any of that got to do with the fact that less than a fortnight ago you gave the Sun as a credible source of information - and now you are saying the complete opposite and making sarcastic remarks about their 'truthfulness' ?

If that's not a clear example of double standards  then I don't know what is. 

[Benice]

..and just for you Benice.

As a reminder of course.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3565461/Madeleine-McCann-s-parents-not-prosecuted-Portuguese-police-believed-leaving-children-meal-English-custom.html

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/511619/Portuguese-minister-reveals-charge-Maddie-McCann-parents-compassion-abandonment-prosecutor

LOL - Nothing whatsoever to do with my comment that you have clearly displayed double standards when it comes to the veracity of articles in the Sun IMO

Anyway carry on deflecting - I have to go out now.

[faithlilly]

Haha, you mean like when Andy Redwood said live on TV that neither the McCanns nor any of their friends were suspects or persons of interest which really meant that they were?

Yes exactly like that and like Chief Inspector Olegario Sousa saying exactly the same thing.

[stephen25000]

LOL - Nothing whatsoever to do with my comment that you have clearly displayed double standards when it comes to the veracity of articles in the Sun IMO

Anyway carry on deflecting - I have to go out now.

The deflection is yours.

Are you calling Rui Pereira, ex-minister of internal affairs, of Portugal, a liar ?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

[Alfie]

Yes exactly like that and like Chief Inspector Olegario Sousa saying exactly the same thing.

So basically you've just shot down your own suggestion that we should pay any notice to live TV interviews haven't you?  Which leaves us with what...?