this is what YOU posted..
What we have is incredibly weak evidence that they have.
you have admitted there is evidence that they have
Key phrase. Incredibly weak.
I have no issue with the poster who brought this incredibly weak evidence to this thread. It is to date, the 'best' we have got, even though it would not pass muster in a criminal or civil court.
So a simple question to you. Is that your evidence?
I ask for a reason. I seem to be getting a reputation already in Portelas when I haven't even managed to buy the house, let alone move in.
Based on incredibly weak evidence, our new neighbour is of the opinion that the McCanns should be charged with anything from child neglect up. And that, based on incredibly weak evidence, is consistently the view of the folks out here.
Should I string up the McCanns on the basis of this incredibly weak evidence? Or should I ask for something convincing?
You ran out of opportunities to provide evidence pages back. The forum rules prevent me from expressing my opinion about your tactics.
Same issue as always - evidence?