I've said all I need to say in this thread:
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=6883.msg293857#msg293857In summary:
- No evidence NB was shot in the main bedroom
- No evidence of any of NB's blood on the bedding
- No evidence of any of NB's blood on the carpet
- DC Hammersley confirmed at trial that everything of evidential value was removed from the bed in the main bedroom
- Carpet samples from the main bedroom were analysed and found to match June's blood group - A and AK2-1
- Blue socks from the main bedroom were analysed and found to match June's blood - A and AK2-1
- Location of casings in the main bedroom and landing do not support the theory NB was shot whilst he was in the main bedroom
I'm not sure any experts have ever categorically stated NB was shot in the main bedroom? If they have on what basis?
Although I agree with Caro on the above I disagree with the following:
- SC slept with June on the basis she wanted to be near the twins. The twins were 6 year olds not new borns.
- If SC wanted to be near the twins JB's former bedroom was closer.
- The bed in the main bedroom looks queen or king sized. NB and June were not heffers and could quite easily accommodate the bears which was probably a bit of child play with the twins. I seem to recall my parents doing similar when their grandchildren stayed over. I'm surprised Caro didn't ask JB about the bears?
- The slippers in SC's bedroom could belong to anyone or just be guest slippers. AP stayed there the previous w.e they may have been his or he may have borrowed a pair from NB. If they were being used by NB or SC then why were they not by the side of the slept in bed?
- SC was clearly using her former bedroom as her personal belongings were on the unused bed.
- The tiny blood sample found outside SC's bedroom door was tested but the results were inconclusive. It could belong to anyone.