« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 13   Go Down

Author Topic: Libel ....  (Read 47301 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline misty

Re: Libel ....
« Reply #75 on: May 31, 2016, 01:18:26 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on May 31, 2016, 12:42:31 PM
Just to pre-warn members on this forum. It would appear that one of our number is crowing elsewhere about the construction of a new dossier of sceptics and their comments.

It was a wind-up nothing more.
« Last Edit: May 31, 2016, 02:13:15 PM by Slartibartfast »
Logged

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Libel ....
« Reply #76 on: May 31, 2016, 01:19:25 PM »
Irrelevant.

Is she an expert in Portuguese Law ?

Keep your eye out.

All good things come to those who wait.
« Last Edit: May 31, 2016, 01:23:02 PM by stephen25000 »
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Libel ....
« Reply #77 on: May 31, 2016, 01:21:09 PM »
Quote from: stephen25000 on May 31, 2016, 01:19:25 PM
Irrelevant.

Is she an expert in Portuguese Law ?

Keep your eyes out.

All good things come to those who wait.

so you cant come up with any grounds...and its keep an eye out
Logged

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Libel ....
« Reply #78 on: May 31, 2016, 01:23:53 PM »
Quote from: davel on May 31, 2016, 01:21:09 PM
so you cant come up with any grounds...and its keep an eye out

I don't need to.

Amaral's lawyers already have.

Like I said, wait and see.
Logged

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Libel ....
« Reply #79 on: May 31, 2016, 01:33:57 PM »
Quote from: G-Unit on May 28, 2016, 03:13:35 PM
I'm afraid everything you're talking about has been considered and ruled upon by two courts. Both courts found that the contents of his book were mostly facts which could be found in the files. His interpretation differed, but he was entitled to present his own interpretation in a literary work. The book will not be considered again by the Portuguese Supreme Court, which will consider only points of law.

No they didn't.

This, second, ruling says that Amaral can say anything he wants, true or false, lowering reputation or not, and get away with it.

Which (so far) Amaral has.
Logged

Offline jassi

Re: Libel ....
« Reply #80 on: May 31, 2016, 01:36:44 PM »
Quote from: ferryman on May 31, 2016, 01:33:57 PM
No they didn't.

This, second, ruling says that Amaral can say anything he wants, true or false, lowering reputation or not, and get away with it.

Which (so far) Amaral has.

So not deemed to be libelous, then
Logged
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Angelo222

Re: Libel ....
« Reply #81 on: May 31, 2016, 02:31:37 PM »
Quote from: ferryman on May 31, 2016, 01:33:57 PM
No they didn't.

This, second, ruling says that Amaral can say anything he wants, true or false, lowering reputation or not, and get away with it.

Which (so far) Amaral has.

You have a strange understanding of court judgements ferryman.  Nowhere does it state that Amaral can say what he wants.
Logged
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Libel ....
« Reply #82 on: May 31, 2016, 02:45:42 PM »
Quote from: stephen25000 on May 31, 2016, 01:23:53 PM
I don't need to.

Amaral's lawyers already have.

Like I said, wait and see.

amarals lawyers have not said anything...it was the court that froze amarals assets not the mccanns...it was the court that banned his book
Logged

Offline faithlilly

Re: Libel ....
« Reply #83 on: May 31, 2016, 03:39:21 PM »
Quote from: misty on May 31, 2016, 01:18:26 PM
It was a wind-up nothing more.

Can I ask what age you are misty ?
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline John

Re: Libel ....
« Reply #84 on: May 31, 2016, 04:24:53 PM »
Quote from: davel on May 31, 2016, 02:45:42 PM
amarals lawyers have not said anything...it was the court that froze amarals assets not the mccanns...it was the court that banned his book

At the McCanns instigation davel.
Logged
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Libel ....
« Reply #85 on: May 31, 2016, 05:02:57 PM »
Quote from: John on May 31, 2016, 04:24:53 PM
At the McCanns instigation davel.
It was the courts decision
Logged

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Libel ....
« Reply #86 on: May 31, 2016, 05:20:45 PM »
Quote from: davel on May 31, 2016, 05:02:57 PM
It was the courts decision

You really think the court would have done it wasn't part of the writ.
Logged
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Libel ....
« Reply #87 on: May 31, 2016, 05:53:44 PM »
Quote from: Slartibartfast on May 31, 2016, 05:20:45 PM
You really think the court would have done it wasn't part of the writ.
It was ultimately the courts decision
That is why.... and sil has agreed with me ... amaral has no grounds to sue the McCanns
Logged

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Libel ....
« Reply #88 on: May 31, 2016, 06:04:56 PM »
If the Mccanns had not brought the action, then yes, no grounds.

However, they did, and have tried to ruin him.

I believe even his pension was seized as part of the freezing of his assets.

It is a pity the mccanns didn't use the money instead, FROM OTHER PEOPLE, to search for Madeleine.

BTW, that is not goading, that is the truth.
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Libel ....
« Reply #89 on: May 31, 2016, 06:07:45 PM »
Quote from: stephen25000 on May 31, 2016, 06:04:56 PM
If the Mccanns had not brought the action, then yes, no grounds.

However, they did, and have tried to ruin him.

I believe even his pension was seized as part of the freezing of his assets.

It is a pity the mccanns didn't use the money instead, FROM OTHER PEOPLE, to search for Madeleine.

BTW, that is not goading, that is the truth.

#Amaral has tried to ruin the McCanns fortunately most have seen through his book full of untruths
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 13   Go Up
« previous next »