Libel ....

[Mr Gray]

That's why it's almost unbelievable  - the odds  are on it not being abduction.

the odds are very likely it was an abduction....you need to think that through

[stephen25000]

the odds are very likely it was an abduction....you need to think that through

Please explain your statistical basis for  saying that.

[John]

the odds are very likely it was an abduction....you need to think that through

Criminal investigations are not based on the throw of a dice davel.  Your claim is nonsense.

[Mr Gray]

Criminal investigations are not based on the throw of a dice davel.  Your claim is nonsense.

not based on the throw of a dice but on all the evidence i have seen and heard...certainly not nonsense...

[stephen25000]

not based on the throw of a dice but on all the evidence i have seen and heard...certainly not nonsense....there is a lot of absolute nonsense on here

Have you worked with the police in criminal investigations davel ?

I would rather take take the word of someone who has, rather than your opinion.

[Mr Gray]

Have you worked with the police in criminal investigations davel ?

I would rather take take the word of someone who has, rather than your opinion.

I think you will find that different policemen have different opinions...that means some of them are going to be plain wrong

[Mr Gray]

Criminal investigations are not based on the throw of a dice davel.  Your claim is nonsense.

the parents are not suspects...so what does that leave...woke and wandered followed by abduction or accident or abducted...that make abduction odds on. not nonsense but perfectly sensible logic

[Alice Purjorick]

absolutely...the odds are tens of millions to one...that's why they thought it was safe

How about a cite or calculation to back that up ?

[jassi]

I think you will find that different policemen have different opinions...that means some of them are going to be plain wrong

You mean they could be wrong about the McCanns not being involved?

[John]

the parents are not suspects...so what does that leave...woke and wandered followed by abduction or accident or abducted...that make abduction odds on. not nonsense but perfectly sensible logic

I would say woke and wandered most likely given the absence of any evidence of an intruder.

[John]

You mean they could be wrong about the McCanns not being involved?

Touché   

[Mr Gray]

I would say woke and wandered most likely given the absence of any evidence of an intruder.

the open window and shutter is evidence of an intruder...and if the mccanns are not suspects then they are telling the truth

[pathfinder73]

the parents are not suspects...so what does that leave...woke and wandered followed by abduction or accident or abducted...that make abduction odds on. not nonsense but perfectly sensible logic

If the parents (last witnesses) aren't suspects then they aren't doing their job. They aren't going to tell us who the prime suspects are for obvious reasons.

[jassi]

the open window and shutter is evidence of an possible  intruder.

[pathfinder73]

the open window and shutter is evidence of an intruder...and if the mccanns are not suspects then they are telling the truth

And how do they know they are telling the truth when their statements change and contradict e.g. doors, Madeleine on top or under covers, 30 seconds or 30 minutes etc.