Author Topic: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?  (Read 124514 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline lordpookles

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #105 on: June 01, 2016, 10:27:18 AM »
Purely hypothetically - a cause of death might have been so shocking and damaging to reputation that 'neglect' was the lesser of two evils.

I agree, but can you add any detail to the hypothesis that makes sense?

Offline jassi

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #106 on: June 01, 2016, 10:29:54 AM »
I agree, but can you add any detail to the hypothesis that makes sense?

Not that has any chance of being published  8(0(*
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #107 on: June 01, 2016, 11:06:48 AM »
Not that has any chance of being published  8(0(*

 8((()*/ If a tragic fall happened it would lead to something else for a cover up of this scale. To think you would make someone disappear over a tragic accident is folly. The investigation starts from Madeleine's last sighting at 5:30 on 3 May not 8:30.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline lordpookles

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #108 on: June 01, 2016, 12:40:13 PM »
I did wado ryu karate
Have a friend who got to 2nd Dan
Trained in Japan at some point
Still just nuts  everyone as first option

True. A simple headbutt does the job. IMO a karate man vs a kickboxer/mma man looses nearly everytime...

Offline lordpookles

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #109 on: June 01, 2016, 12:42:05 PM »
8((()*/ If a tragic fall happened it would lead to something else for a cover up of this scale. To think you would make someone disappear over a tragic accident is folly. The investigation starts from Madeleine's last sighting at 5:30 on 3 May not 8:30.

Yep the clock starts ticking at 5.30. Hypothetically what kind of accident could possibly explain the timeframe? A blow to the head seems unlikely as does death from calpol.. Can't imagine how a blow to the head 24hrs previously would work at all given the child would be very poorly all that day...

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #110 on: June 01, 2016, 12:55:54 PM »
True. A simple headbutt does the job. IMO a karate man vs a kickboxer/mma man looses nearly everytime...

Head butt and as the assailant collapses forward upward reverse punch with the power coming from the hip twist to break several ribs
Job done

Offline jassi

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #111 on: June 01, 2016, 12:57:05 PM »
A smack around the head causing child's head into  contact with sharp corner of table might do the trick.

« Last Edit: June 01, 2016, 01:35:00 PM by Brietta »
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #112 on: June 01, 2016, 01:04:16 PM »
Yep the clock starts ticking at 5.30. Hypothetically what kind of accident could possibly explain the timeframe? A blow to the head seems unlikely as does death from calpol.. Can't imagine how a blow to the head 24hrs previously would work at all given the child would be very poorly all that day...

Though from Davel's comment, the clock starts ticking 24 hours earlier.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline John

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #113 on: June 01, 2016, 01:10:08 PM »
The skull does have its weak points. One is the “pterion”, which corresponds to what is commonly called the “temple”.

Just beneath this thin bit of skull is the middle meningeal artery, between the skull and the dura. If you get clonked in the temple, this artery can rupture. And where does that blood go? Nowhere. It can’t burst through the rigid skull, so it simply expands, pushing against the dura mater, and hence the brain, and gives you the above scenario. Clinically, the injury can be inapparent until the pressure is sufficiently high inside the skull. At first, the injured person may feel fine, but as the blood accumulates, the patient develops a headache, and rapidly becomes unconscious and dies, unless a neurosurgeon opens the skull.

So death can occur after a fall and for the most part go unnoticed, it just depends on the circumstances.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #114 on: June 01, 2016, 01:52:56 PM »
The skull does have its weak points. One is the “pterion”, which corresponds to what is commonly called the “temple”.

Just beneath this thin bit of skull is the middle meningeal artery, between the skull and the dura. If you get clonked in the temple, this artery can rupture. And where does that blood go? Nowhere. It can’t burst through the rigid skull, so it simply expands, pushing against the dura mater, and hence the brain, and gives you the above scenario. Clinically, the injury can be inapparent until the pressure is sufficiently high inside the skull. At first, the injured person may feel fine, but as the blood accumulates, the patient develops a headache, and rapidly becomes unconscious and dies, unless a neurosurgeon opens the skull.

So death can occur after a fall and for the most part go unnoticed, it just depends on the circumstances.

So death is not instant even with a blow to the temple...I've already explained this several posts back...the idea that maddie suffered a head injury and died whilst the mccanns were at the tapas is a non starter


Offline Admin

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #115 on: June 01, 2016, 02:04:14 PM »
So death is not instant even with a blow to the temple...I've already explained this several posts back...the idea that maddie suffered a head injury and died whilst the mccanns were at the tapas is a non starter

She could have sustained a knock to her head at any time, it was unlikely to have occurred after 8.30pm the day she disappeared.  Do people sustain knocks to their head whilst out in dinghies?
« Last Edit: June 01, 2016, 02:07:40 PM by Admin »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #116 on: June 01, 2016, 02:06:34 PM »
She could have sustained a knock to her head at any time, it was unlikely to have occured after 8.30pm the day she disappeared.

It is unlikely this would have gone unnnoticed

Offline Angelo222

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #117 on: June 01, 2016, 02:24:43 PM »
It is unlikely this would have gone unnnoticed

One would think so but a brain swell is not noticeable.   Thinking outside the curve for a moment, a knock to her head would explain the lethargy which her parents put down to tiredness.  Maybe her brain swell increased as she slept, maybe she got up with a nose bleed and collapsed over the back of the settee.

Her parents come home and find her...oh shock horror what will people say...our careers are dust.

All entirely speculative of course and in my opinion a second place runner to walk...wandered...disappeared.
« Last Edit: June 01, 2016, 02:29:16 PM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #118 on: June 01, 2016, 02:40:09 PM »
One would think so but a brain swell is not noticeable.   Thinking outside the curve for a moment, a knock to her head would explain the lethargy which her parents put down to tiredness.  Maybe her brain swell increased as she slept, maybe she got up with a nose bleed and collapsed over the back of the settee.

Her parents come home and find her...oh shock horror what will people say...our careers are dust.

All entirely speculative of course and in my opinion a second place runner to walk...wandered...disappeared.

the main fault is that their careers would not be dust..this is a total misconception....it would have to have been a reasonably severe knock.../she would have cried and told someone

Offline Jean-Pierre

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #119 on: June 01, 2016, 02:46:28 PM »
One would think so but a brain swell is not noticeable.   Thinking outside the curve for a moment, a knock to her head would explain the lethargy which her parents put down to tiredness.  Maybe her brain swell increased as she slept, maybe she got up with a nose bleed and collapsed over the back of the settee.

Her parents come home and find her...oh shock horror what will people say...our careers are dust.

All entirely speculative of course and in my opinion a second place runner to walk...wandered...disappeared.

In which case there would have been a fair amount of blood around.  And why on earth would such an accident have any effect on their careers?