Apart from the NoW article post trial I have read JM contributed an article in the female mag 'She' although I haven't seen any evidence for this.
As far as I can see all these low budget tv docu/dramas feature the same faces:
- Relatives, usually DB
- BW
- Low ranking officers eg DS Jones, PS Bews, DI Miller, DI Cook
- Tabloid journalists eg Kieron Saunders, Michael Fielder
- Local Essex Journalists eg reasonably good looking guy in CTSB and an aesthetically challenged guy in Behind Mansion Walls or 'Killing Mum and Dad'. The titles of these low budget/docu dramas say it all!
We never hear from high ranking officers or experts such as Dr Vanezis, Malcolm Fletcher, John Hayward (now deceased) or Dr Ferguson.
Consequently these low budget docu/dramas can offer little, if anything, by way of evidential value.
Well, what do you expect?
No TV company are going to push the boat out for Jeremy Bamber who was old news thirty years ago...
The only documentary they did spend money on was the WHF drama based on CAL’s excellent, factual, well-researched book.
On YouTube there’s a few terribly amateurish pro-JM documentaries; one where the man doing the voiceover sounds like he’s stepped out of the 1930s — obviously done for effect, but all it did was make it sound weird.
I don’t share your view that the TRUE documentaries featured “low ranking” detectives: two Detective INSPECTORS and Detective Sergeant Jones — who actually DEALT with the case — were hardly low ranking.
What did you think of Jeremy’s solicitor in one of the YouTube docs? You know, the one who had the high-pitched voice and claimed he’d represented Saddam Hussain; that it was “impossible “ for Jeremy to have carried out the murders; then shortly after was arrested himself, charged, then convicted at court for impersonating a solicitor and sentenced to prison for about 12 years? Low ranking or high ranking?
