I am not saying Jeremy must be innocent because of Julies evidence, I am saying that because the evidence surrounding Julie contains a considerable degree of connivance and inconsistencies it does not prove Jeremy is guilty and should not be used as evidence of such. Like it or not the evidence surrounding Julie favours the defence case because it can be linked directly to AE and not Jeremy
Holly seems to be looking at the minor details like ones activities on certain days whereas my analysis was based on the crime scene. What Holly has noticed is significant because its the minor details that they wont bother to go over and correct.
There is zero evidence of an connivance except in your dreams.
Time and again I have pointed out to you her most important testimony. You have produced zilch to impeach it. You thus totally ignore it and make up a strawman argument.
Julie's crucial testimony:
1) Jeremy told her he was planning to kill his family for nearly a year but she thought he was kidding
a) Jeremy initially told her he wanted to burn the house down as his family slept trying to make it appear Nevill fell asleep with a cigarette and this caused an accidental fire
b) Julie gave Jeremy sleeping pills for himself. He subsequently told her he tried them out in contemplation of using them on his family but found them unsuitable.
c) He told Julie the fire idea was no good and instead he would shoot everyone and make it appear sheila did it.
d) He told Julie he would use the windows to get in and planned to use a bike and was going to tested out how long a bike ride would take
2) The night of the murders Jeremy phoned her around 11pm and complained to her about how hard he was forced to work and told her it was the night he would kill them.
3) After the murders before phoning police he phoned Julie and told her he had not been to bed yet, that his plan was going well and effectively told her they were dead.
This is the damning testimony from Julie.
That Jeremy lied to her afterwards about hiring a hitman to carry out the murders and other few details he provided to her about how the murders were carried out were not significant.
That Jeremy lied about the details afterward is fully admitted. Yet you create the strawman that the prosecution argued Jeremy was guilty because the details he provided after committing the murders. Next you say all of
Julie's testimony is unreliable because of those lies were inaccurate.
You do this because you are a Jeremy activist. Your bias causes you to say her testimony must be rejected not logic. Biased activists make extraordinarily useless advocates. Biased activist ignore inconvenient things rather than addressing them. Ignoring things do not make them go away. An effective advocate must establish Julie lied about bullet points 1-3 posted above. Attacking what the prosecution admitted were largely lies from Jeremy to Julie fails to do so.
There is no reason for Julie to make up such things to frame Jeremy.
She told this to someone else who ran to the police with the story she didn't rush to them on her own.
Jeremy did indeed use windows to enter and exit WHF so it is possible for him to have planned to do such and to have told her he planned to do such.
Jeremy told others he would never share his inheritance with anyone else.
It is a fact that Jeremy called Julie shortly before the murders and shortly after before even calling police. This supports her story. If he actually received the distress call he claimed then he should not have called her period let alone before police. In addition he lied and claimed he called her after police though he called her first. He lied because he knew it undermined his claim of receiving a distress call.
Physical evidence establishes Sheila didn't load the magazine, fire the gun, didn't beat Nevill, and can't have killed herself. Physical evidence proves Sheila was shot while propped up against something with the moderator attached. The killer removed the moderator and put it away then dragged her body flat and stuck the gun across her body. The killer clearly framed her. This supports what Julie said.
You have no evidence to establish Julie lied you simply say she did because you are in the tank for Jeremy.
