Author Topic: Consider this scenario - Would a guilty person keep their case alive for many years?  (Read 81508 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lace

I really don't think the hypothetical people, if they were guilty would go through all the trouble of hiring private investigators,   if they were guilty surely just keeping the fund open and manning the telephones for sightings would be enough to show the public they were actively searching for their child?     Then when after a few years the fund dwindled and they couldn't afford to run the telephones then gradually close it down,  they didn't do this however,  but wrote a book to keep the fund going and they petitioned  for the case to be reviewed!! 

« Last Edit: June 30, 2016, 10:52:53 AM by Lace »

Offline jassi

I believe it's called control.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Lace

I believe it's called control.

They would have had control letting the case dwindle into history.

Offline pathfinder73

They would have had control letting the case dwindle into history.

They aren't in charge of the case, the police are. Control freaks may think they are smarter and want more inside information/files to keep one step ahead of the police.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2016, 11:20:33 AM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Alfie

  • Guest
I believe it's called control.
When you hand everything over to the police to review you relinquish control, unless you're suggesting out protagonist control the police too?

Offline Lace

They aren't in charge of the case, the police are. Control freaks may think they are smarter and want more inside information/files to keep one step ahead of the police.

The police had shelved the case,    it was the hypothetical people keeping it in the public domain,  it was the hypothetical people who wanted a review and then the case to be reopened,  that is keeping control over their missing kid.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2016, 08:17:47 PM by John »

Alfie

  • Guest
Why would you ask the PM for a review, going so far as to enlist the most widely read newspaper to help publicise your request, if it was the last thing in the world you actually wanted? 

Assuming you actually did want a review then how would you be expected to demonstrate your "cock-a-hoopedness" when a review was granted?
« Last Edit: June 30, 2016, 03:33:17 PM by Alfie »

Offline slartibartfast

Why would you ask the PM for a review, going so far as to enlist the most widely read newspaper to help publicise your request, if it was the last thing in the world you actually wanted? 

Assuming you actually did want a review then how would you be expected to demonstrate your "cock-a-hoopedness" when a review was granted?

Asking for and wanting are two very different things .
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline sadie

Asking for and wanting are two very different things .

Well we know a parent who asked for / pestered for a review and got it.  He wanted it alright.

Cant see the difference with this hypothetical scenario.  End of.

Alfie

  • Guest
Asking for and wanting are two very different things .
Explain.

"I am asking for something but I don't want it" - why ask in the first place then?

Offline faithlilly

Explain.

"I am asking for something but I don't want it" - why ask in the first place then?

Because you don't think your request will be granted?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Alfie

  • Guest
Because you don't think your request will be granted?
rWhat grounds would you have for thnkng your request wouldn't be granted and why even bother asking for a review in the first place?  You could always have asked in a low key way without getting the media involved if you didn't really want it to happen.

Offline faithlilly

rWhat grounds would you have for thnkng your request wouldn't be granted and why even bother asking for a review in the first place?  You could always have asked in a low key way without getting the media involved if you didn't really want it to happen.

You know the evidence so far collected was not enough to bring charges so requesting a review of that same evidence would almost certainly throw up no new evidence against you. What wasn't predicted is that funding for a new investigation  would be made available.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Alfie

  • Guest
You know the evidence so far collected was not enough to bring charges so requesting a review of that same evidence would almost certainly throw up no new evidence against you. What wasn't predicted is that funding for a new investigation  would be made available.
Your answer above does not relate to the questions I asked.

Offline slartibartfast

Your answer above does not relate to the questions I asked.

Why don't you tell us the answer you will be happy with and save all this messing around?
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.