IF (and it's a ridiculous if) Sheila was downstairs holding a loaded gun, and looking a bit mental, when would Ralph have let her get on with it, and waste valuable moments calling a knackered Jeremy with the vague hope that he'd pick up?
There's no problem whatsoever with criticising any material here or elsewhere providing it doesn't:
- break any UKJF rules
- contain any personally identifiable information (pii) over and above that which individuals choose to make public
- amount to online bullying
- break any laws
The posts in question contained pii about an individual who chooses to use an online user name and were therefore removed.
I share your views puglove about some of the comments made elsewhere about June. Eg suggesting June had a direct hand in any of the murders is plainly absurd. Unfortunately that's what comes from a very poorly managed forum and posters who have an equally poor understanding of the facts of the case. I can only attempt to manage what goes on here as fairly as possible and try and find the right balance between free speech and respect for the law which has found JB guilty, the victims, prosecution witnesses, the police and others involved.
I'm always receptive to feedback on the forum or via pm.

I can see how some, many, and probably the jury were/are unable to envisage NB phoning JB and/or allowing SC to slope off with a firearm etc and yet the soc seems to suggest this is what happened by way of blood staining to the carpets (and lack of), casings, trajectories etc.