Should Jeremy Bamber ever be released?

[sika]

Never is a very long time Sika?

Do you not think he might get parole in another 30 years?

He might do a Hindley, get to the age of 60, and finally confess.

Yes Shona, he might do, but it didn't do her much good did it! There was never any suggestion that she would be released, post confession.

[puglove]

Never is a very long time Sika?

Do you not think he might get parole in another 30 years?

He might do a Hindley, get to the age of 60, and finally confess.

And the continual bile and criticism aimed at Colin, whose loss was unimaginable, is reprehensible. Very representative of the few remaining Bamber supporters.

[Iggy68]

Never is a very long time Sika?

Do you not think he might get parole in another 30 years?

No John, I don't.  I don't even think that by admitting his guilt, he will be released.
His protestations over the years have done him no favours. They have merely compounded most people's belief, that he is a lying, devious, manipulative little shit.

P.S. never had Tesko down as a Rihanna fan!

 
that'd be the one bit of taste the Tesko has.  his support of Bamber is extreme tasteless

[puglove]

Never is a very long time Sika?

Do you not think he might get parole in another 30 years?

He might do a Hindley, get to the age of 60, and finally confess.

Yes Shona, he might do, but it didn't do her much good did it! There was never any suggestion that she would be released, post confession.

You're right, it didn't get her out, thank God. I just think it was the last card she had to play.

[Iggy68]

Never is a very long time Sika?

Do you not think he might get parole in another 30 years?

He might do a Hindley, get to the age of 60, and finally confess.

Yes Shona, he might do, but it didn't do her much good did it! There was never any suggestion that she would be released, post confession.

You're right, it didn't get her out, thank God. I just think it was the last card she had to play.

 
Hindley f..ked up her chance of release way back in 1973

[sika]

Never is a very long time Sika?

Do you not think he might get parole in another 30 years?

He might do a Hindley, get to the age of 60, and finally confess.

Yes Shona, he might do, but it didn't do her much good did it! There was never any suggestion that she would be released, post confession.

You're right, it didn't get her out, thank God. I just think it was the last card she had to play.

 
Hindley f..ked up her chance of release way back in 1973

Was there a specific event in '73, to which you refer Iggy?

[puglove]

Never is a very long time Sika?

Do you not think he might get parole in another 30 years?

No John, I don't.  I don't even think that by admitting his guilt, he will be released.
His protestations over the years have done him no favours. They have merely compounded most people's belief, that he is a lying, devious, manipulative little shit.

P.S. never had Tesko down as a Rihanna fan!

 
that'd be the one bit of taste the Tesko has.  his support of Bamber is extreme tasteless

As are his claims that he knows where Madeleine's body is buried, and he's trained his stepson's dog to find Keith Bennett. And Sheila wrote a message in menstrual blood, her body was used for porn.....ugh. Not a single credible bone in that short, little body. Bamber has the supporters that he deserves.

[Iggy68]

Never is a very long time Sika?

Do you not think he might get parole in another 30 years?

He might do a Hindley, get to the age of 60, and finally confess.

Yes Shona, he might do, but it didn't do her much good did it! There was never any suggestion that she would be released, post confession.

You're right, it didn't get her out, thank God. I just think it was the last card she had to play.

 
Hindley f..ked up her chance of release way back in 1973

Was there a specific event in '73, to which you refer Iggy?

 
not one actual event but there were changes she made ,  she returned to catholicism , broke all ties with Brady , tried to culture another image of herself to the public and started studying . 
 
Question remains as to why she didnt at that point say they had killed 2 more children.... it wasnt until 1987. She couldnt deny knowledge of the fact she was present at the abduction of Pauline Reade but never said anything

[puglove]

Never is a very long time Sika?

Do you not think he might get parole in another 30 years?

He might do a Hindley, get to the age of 60, and finally confess.

Yes Shona, he might do, but it didn't do her much good did it! There was never any suggestion that she would be released, post confession.

You're right, it didn't get her out, thank God. I just think it was the last card she had to play.

 
Hindley f..ked up her chance of release way back in 1973

Was there a specific event in '73, to which you refer Iggy?

 
not one actual event but there were changes she made ,  she returned to catholicism , broke all ties with Brady , tried to culture another image of herself to the public and started studying . 
 
Question remains as to why she didnt at that point say they had killed 2 more children.... it wasnt until 1987. She couldnt deny knowledge of the fact she was present at the abduction of Pauline Reade but never said anything

She did try a massive turn-around, didn't she?

When Bamber supporters state that he never showed any signs of violence before the murders, it ALWAYS reminds me of Hindley. Up until she went on her cold-hearted killing spree, she was a quiet girl who loved dogs and cared for her Nan. If the proclivity is there, however latent, it's there.

[goatboy]

Never is a very long time Sika?

Do you not think he might get parole in another 30 years?

He might do a Hindley, get to the age of 60, and finally confess.

Yes Shona, he might do, but it didn't do her much good did it! There was never any suggestion that she would be released, post confession.

You're right, it didn't get her out, thank God. I just think it was the last card she had to play.

 
Hindley f..ked up her chance of release way back in 1973

Was there a specific event in '73, to which you refer Iggy?

 
not one actual event but there were changes she made ,  she returned to catholicism , broke all ties with Brady , tried to culture another image of herself to the public and started studying . 
 
Question remains as to why she didnt at that point say they had killed 2 more children.... it wasnt until 1987. She couldnt deny knowledge of the fact she was present at the abduction of Pauline Reade but never said anything

She did try a massive turn-around, didn't she?

When Bamber supporters state that he never showed any signs of violence before the murders, it ALWAYS reminds me of Hindley. Up until she went on her cold-hearted killing spree, she was a quiet girl who loved dogs and cared for her Nan. If the proclivity is there, however latent, it's there.

Agreed, imagine if there had been signs of violence in his youth-they would then argue that was merely youthful high jinks which he got over, and had no relation to his later life (like Simon Hall's supporters do). Little details like Julie saying he said he had been strangling rats to try to build up courage are very interesting. I can't imagine Julie could have made that bit up.

[starryian]

Never is a very long time Sika?

Do you not think he might get parole in another 30 years?

No John, I don't.  I don't even think that by admitting his guilt, he will be released.
His protestations over the years have done him no favours. They have merely compounded most people's belief, that he is a lying, devious, manipulative little shit.

P.S. never had Tesko down as a Rihanna fan!

 
that'd be the one bit of taste the Tesko has.  his support of Bamber is extreme tasteless

As are his claims that he knows where Madeleine's body is buried, and he's trained his stepson's dog to find Keith Bennett. And Sheila wrote a message in menstrual blood, her body was used for porn.....ugh. Not a single credible bone in that short, little body. Bamber has the supporters that he deserves.

Well said Shona,
Tesko is hardened criminal used to a life of constant lying and denial, even when it is pointed out to him and he is challenged, he carries on lying. This is because lying to him is second nature. He has gone beyond the point of no return years ago. I notice he is extremely poor at analysing himself or his own actions. He lives in a world of constant self-denial, of blaming others for his own ineptitude, shortcomings and lies. It is always someone else fault, never his. He is the type of person that would rob someone's home and then the next day go around to the same house, ring the doorbell, and ask the owner if he has just been robbed.
The man is an appalling hypocrite, one of the worst I have ever encountered. He swear's blind that everything he says is the truth (and he knows full well it is not) and in the same sentence has no qualms about accusing others of telling lies. This is the way hardened criminals behave. In their utter stupidity they will blame the law for arresting them and often hold life-long vendetta's against the police and rail against the judicial system because they hate it. They hate it because they were caught and punished for their wrongdoing. It is here that their logic is faulty. In never seems to dawn on them that they have been fairly caught. Their own ego cannot accept the fact, so they turn it into hatred to salve their own ego. Tesko is just such a person.

[Tim Invictus]

Tesko is just a no mark. A total waste of oxygen and benefits. His existence is as pointless as Bamber's ; talk about taking your gay fantasies to the extreme!

[Milly]

i dont think it would be safe to ever release jeremy bamber as he has made upteen threats towards the remaining family.isnt that why he is being kept in a higher security regime than he would otherwise have been at full sutton just in case he absconds.

[starryian]

I agree Milly,
He is and will remain a danger to others. However, the reason he is in a top maximum security prison like Full Sutton is not because he might abscond (there is no danger of that in such a high-profile case) , it is because of the appalling nature of his crimes. Let us remember that this waste of oxygen murdered in cold blood, two five year old defenseless boys, a man and two women. All of whom were members of his immediate family. People who trusted him, loved him and gave him everything he ever desired. They gave him a home, a family, a job, a house of his own, a car, a private education, virtually everything a young person could ever possibly want. How did he repay them? He repaid them by sneaking into their home in the dead of night, when they were at their most vulnerable and brutally murdering them one-by-one. All because he wanted their money. He wanted what they had worked so hard for. He believed that this money was his and their lives were worthless and forfeit.
This inhuman monster is totally beneath contempt. He lacks the very qualities that make us human and deserves to be treated accordingly.This despicable animal will be caged until the day he dies.
Those who believe in justice in this life, he is getting his every single day; every time he manages to peer out of his window in a 10 X 8 cell and see's free people going about their daily lives. Those who believe in devine retribution - the fires are being stoked and cutlasses are being sharpened. Whatever your belief, this man is getting exactly what he deserves.

[puglove]

I agree Milly,
He is and will remain a danger to others. However, the reason he is in a top maximum security prison like Full Sutton is not because he might abscond (there is no danger of that in such a high-profile case) , it is because of the appalling nature of his crimes. Let us remember that this waste of oxygen murdered in cold blood, two five year old defenseless boys, a man and two women. All of whom were members of his immediate family. People who trusted him, loved him and gave him everything he ever desired. They gave him a home, a family, a job, a house of his own, a car, a private education, virtually everything a young person could ever possibly want. How did he repay them? He repaid them by sneaking into their home in the dead of night, when they were at their most vulnerable and brutally murdering them one-by-one. All because he wanted their money. He wanted what they had worked so hard for. He believed that this money was his and their lives were worthless and forfeit.
This inhuman monster is totally beneath contempt. He lacks the very qualities that make us human and deserves to be treated accordingly.This despicable animal will be caged until the day he dies.
Those who believe in justice in this life, he is getting his every single day; every time he manages to peer out of his window in a 10 X 8 cell and see's free people going about their daily lives. Those who believe in devine retribution - the fires are being stoked and cutlasses are being sharpened. Whatever your belief, this man is getting exactly what he deserves.

An excellent post, Ian. And only a truly callous and avaricious man would snigger and make lewd comments about his dead sister, and try to sell photos of her and her dead children to The Sun.