Pick any sentence from Kate's book.

[stephen25000]

Have you ever thought that perhaps SY after going through the files and interviewing people,   they worked out the timeline and found it impossible that the McCann's could have hidden Madeleine's body in the time available to them?    Something Amaral didn't do,  he just had his theory,  he didn't say how they were supposed to have cleaned up and hidden Madeleine's body all in the short time before the alarm was raised,  that's because he couldn't.

SY have worked out the only possible conclusion is abduction.

Or they are completely wrong.

Maybe that is why they have found nothing as regards abduction.

You cannot find what does not exist.

[slartibartfast]

Well he cancelled it.

Because of lack of support from the T9.

[Lace]

Because of lack of support from the T9.

No the first one.

[Lace]

Or they are completely wrong.

Maybe that is why they have found nothing as regards abduction.

You cannot find what does not exist.

Don't see them following anything else.

[stephen25000]

Don't see them following anything else.

Have they found how Madeleine disappeared ?

NOPE

[Lace]

Have they found how Madeleine disappeared ?

NOPE

Yes they have,   they stated Madeleine had been taken by a stranger  years ago.

[Lace]

Do you really think that seeing a picture of the McCanns prompts people to look for Madeleine, particularly when they have no idea of what she will look like ?

It would remind people of the case and maybe people would be more aware.   For instance if a child lives in their vicinity who is 13 years old has a fleck in her eye and resembles the photo of Madeleine aged 9,  even if she is supposed to be 9 in that photo I doubt if her features would have changed dramatically.

[stephen25000]

Yes they have,   they stated Madeleine had been taken by a stranger  years ago.

It is an unproven thesis.

Please try to be accurate.

[Robittybob1]

Yes they have,   they stated Madeleine had been taken by a stranger  years ago.

All options except parental involvement must be on the table.

[slartibartfast]

All options except parental involvement must be on the table.

All options.

[Robittybob1]

All options.

Why I said "all options except parental involvement must be on the table" was that they have been thoroughly examined already. Do you think they still need more scrutiny?

[slartibartfast]

Why I said "all options except parental involvement must be on the table" was that they have been thoroughly examined already. Do you think they still need more scrutiny?

As no one except those involved knows what happened it would be silly to put any area out of bounds for investigation.

[Alfie]

As no one except those involved knows what happened it would be silly to put any area out of bounds for investigation.

What would be silly is to keep on suspecting someone who has been thoroughly investigated and for whom there is no evidence nor any opportunity for them to have committed the crime, or do you think Murat for example should still be in the frame?

[Lace]

Since the cause of her disappearance is unknown, then how do you rule out all the logical possibilities.

I think experienced detectives would know what they were doing,   if they have gone over the statements and interviewed again,  then they would be able to see where each person was during the time Madeleine would have disappeared,  and therefore ruling them out.

Amaral says Gerry was in the Tapas Bar during the time of the Smith sighting,  then he goes on to say Martin Smith was 60/80% sure the man could have  been Gerry, BY THE WAY HE HELD THE CHILD!!!   Now if SY have found that Gerry was indeed in the Tapas Bar Dianne Webster said that Kate said 'she's gone Gerry' so that means he was sitting at the table when Kate give her alert and also  a waiter saw Gerry searching around the pool area not long after the alert,    then that would rule Gerry out,  wouldn't it?

[Robittybob1]

If an investigation comes to an end with no solution, then the only course of action, if you want to get to the bottom of it, is the revisit old ground.

I'd prefer to go over new ground.
Like looking at the safety of the balustrades?  Whether there were people looking for Madeleine prior to Kate's alert?  Whether there were earlier phone calls to the police?  What were the OC staff doing in the kid's bedrooms? Find out what Matt was doing in the adult bedroom?  Are all the children other than Madeleine accounted for?