Pick any sentence from Kate's book.

[Alfie]

It is always more comfortable when you don't have to address other opinions.

It's also much nicer not to be provoked and abused and wound up in the way that Mercury likes to do - which is one reason why I get far fewer penalty points these days.  The last person to insult me to the point where I was rude back was SIL and so I received a warning.  Now she's on ignore no more abuse from her to deal with - brilliant. 
PS: in case you hadn't noticed I spend ALL my time here addressing others' opinions.

[G-Unit]

It's also much nicer not to be provoked and abused and wound up in the way that Mercury likes to do - which is one reason why I get far fewer penalty points these days.  The last person to insult me to the point where I was rude back was SIL and so I received a warning.  Now she's on ignore no more abuse from her to deal with - brilliant. 
PS: in case you hadn't noticed I spend ALL my time here addressing others' opinions.

It's only my opinion, so feel free to ignore, but from my point of view you seem to spend ALL your time asking questions. 

[Alfie]

It's only my opinion, so feel free to ignore, but from my point of view you seem to spend ALL your time asking questions. 

What's wrong with that?  Isn't that what you're doing?  Constantly questioning the McCanns' version of events?

there you go, 3 more questions for you to ignore, as is your wont! 

[stephen25000]

What's wrong with that?  Isn't that what you're doing?  Constantly questioning the McCanns' version of events?

there you go, 3 more questions for you to ignore, as is your wont! 

Why should the Mccanns version of events be believed, when they are full of contradictions and altered accounts starting of course with the classic.................

LOCKED APARTMENT became UNLOCKED APARTMENT.

Those are mutually exclusive events.

[G-Unit]

What's wrong with that?  Isn't that what you're doing?  Constantly questioning the McCanns' version of events?

there you go, 3 more questions for you to ignore, as is your wont! 

Once again you are telling me what I do. That's just your opinion. Try questioning what I say rather than constantly telling me what you think I say and why you think I say it.

Remember; by publicising their version in the media, interviews and a book the McCanns [and their supporters] have to accept that others can question their version of events. It's not a forbidden subject.

[Alfie]

Once again you are telling me what I do. That's just your opinion. Try questioning what I say rather than constantly telling me what you think I say and why you think I say it.

Remember; by publicising their version in the media, interviews and a book the McCanns [and their supporters] have to accept that others can question their version of events. It's not a forbidden subject.

Of course it's my opinion, whose opinion should I be representing?  You pick and choose which questions to answer, the ones that are harder for you to address you ignore, the last few pages of this thread is proof of that.  IMO.  << There, happy?
I constantly question what (I think) you say - if I am wrong about what I think you say then maybe you're not making yourself clear - you have limitless opportunities to correct me, so please feel free to do so and I will re-phrase the question.

[Alfie]

Once again you are telling me what I do. That's just your opinion. Try questioning what I say rather than constantly telling me what you think I say and why you think I say it.

Remember; by publicising their version in the media, interviews and a book the McCanns [and their supporters] have to accept that others can question their version of events. It's not a forbidden subject.

Please point to any post I have made in which I claim that questioning the McCanns' version of events is or should be a forbidden subject.  Many thanks.

[G-Unit]

Please point to any post I have made in which I claim that questioning the McCanns' version of events is or should be a forbidden subject.  Many thanks.

You seem to enjoy pointless arguments, I don't. I'll wait and give you examples as they occur so you can try to understand.

[Alfie]

You seem to enjoy pointless arguments, I don't. I'll wait and give you examples as they occur so you can try to understand.

There you go patronising me again, you can't help yourself can you? 

I have never said that questioning the McCann version of events is forbidden, but I do find it laughable and a bit sad that there are some who feel it is their moral duty to question every minute detail in Kate's book, for example - hence this thread.   If you don't enjoy pointless arguments (and you've made it very clear that you consider my contribution to this forum pointless) then I suggest you stop engaging with me altogether.  I however will continue to challenge your posts, like it or not.

[Alice Purjorick]

There you go patronising me again, you can't help yourself can you? 

I have never said that questioning the McCann version of events is forbidden, but I do find it laughable and a bit sad that there are some who feel it is their moral duty to question every minute detail in Kate's book, for example - hence this thread.   If you don't enjoy pointless arguments (and you've made it very clear that you consider my contribution to this forum pointless) then I suggest you stop engaging with me altogether.  I however will continue to challenge your posts, like it or not.

But you do not find it equally laughable that you make disparaging remarks about Sr Amaral and things Portuguese for no apparent reason ?.......................... well scroat me gently with a knotted water kelpie.

[mercury]

It's also much nicer not to be provoked and abused and wound up in the way that Mercury likes to do - which is one reason why I get far fewer penalty points these days.  The last person to insult me to the point where I was rude back was SIL and so I received a warning.  Now she's on ignore no more abuse from her to deal with - brilliant. 
PS: in case you hadn't noticed I spend ALL my time here addressing others' opinions.

Laughable

Accusing me of giving you most of your penalty points

You started a thread with a legit question

I answered it with a legit comment

Your response was about abuse winding up and provoking, not got a mirror handy?

Perhaps I could get a response go my legit comment to your legit question? Or is that too much to ask?

[mercury]

Mercury is on my (ever growing) ignore list so please pass on my apologies for not replying to any posts aimed at me.

An ever growing ignore list means you are hiding because theres only a couple of people here who one should ignore for various reasons

And im sure you read all your hidden posters comments anyway LOL

So how about manning up for a change

[mercury]

I'm not deflecting. The fact is, the person who made the original bookings was the most guilty, as that allowed the information to be possibly shared covertly with other OC employees/locals/other holidaymakers. GM knew who he had told about his childcare arrangements.
I am no doubt guilty of the most heinous childcare crimes according to the gospel of the perfect parenting brigade  aka McCann sceptics so I will refrain from commenting on the last time I abandoned my children.

Its not about perfect parenting but basic
When you leave toddlers alone you are risking alot

And gerry told wilkins and mckenzie iirc or one of the other diners at the tapas that they were leaving their kids alone....pathetic

[mercury]

There you go patronising me again, you can't help yourself can you? 

I have never said that questioning the McCann version of events is forbidden, but I do find it laughable and a bit sad that there are some who feel it is their moral duty to question every minute detail in Kate's book, for example - hence this thread.   If you don't enjoy pointless arguments (and you've made it very clear that you consider my contribution to this forum pointless) then I suggest you stop engaging with me altogether.  I however will continue to challenge your posts, like it or not.

Why do you assume or fabricate so much?? Since when has criticism been moral or a duty....when somethng dont add up, or is "off" one questions and or criticises,  just from observation....its a mental process that all use...why bring morals into it? A bit less moralising on your part wouldnt go AMISS anyway lol

What was it you posted months ago ? That sceptics minds were similar to peter sutcliffes! ? Lol

That argument alone e should disbar you for complaining about anything or criticising as it was as low as possible

Whinger

[Robittybob1]

Its not about perfect parenting but basic
When you leave toddlers alone you are risking alot

And gerry told wilkins and mckenzie iirc or one of the other diners at the tapas that they were leaving their kids alone....pathetic

Were you there to hear that conversation?  If not cite please, for it is rather a libelous comment to make.