Author Topic: Let's have a close look at what Matt says.  (Read 24598 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Let's have a close look at what Matt says.
« Reply #30 on: September 22, 2016, 07:54:07 PM »
I was looking for a word to describe the (hypothetical) person.   
"Well if there was someone in the room while Gerry was there what would you call the other person?
Well if there was someone in the room while Matthew was there what would you call the other person?"

I suppose you could call them unpaid babysitters, intruders, burglars, thieves.  Unpaid child minders is my choice.

...and not one jot of evidence to show one ever existed.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Let's have a close look at what Matt says.
« Reply #31 on: September 22, 2016, 07:54:43 PM »
was it three children or just the two?  was it three children plus the unpaid child minder?

???

Offline mercury

Re: Let's have a close look at what Matt says.
« Reply #32 on: September 22, 2016, 07:57:06 PM »
???

Rofl
We now have an unpaid childminder....who is that?

 @)(++(*

Offline jassi

Re: Let's have a close look at what Matt says.
« Reply #33 on: September 22, 2016, 07:58:16 PM »
was it three children or just the two?  was it three children plus the unpaid child minder?

We are told that there were 3 at the beginning of the evening and 2 at the end, though this has never been corroborated by an independent witness.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline John

Re: Let's have a close look at what Matt says.
« Reply #34 on: September 22, 2016, 07:59:26 PM »
Well if there was someone in the room while Gerry was there what would you call the other person?
Well if there was someone in the room while Matthew was there what would you call the other person?

In both cases I would call them an intruder.  There is no real way to square the moving door to the children's bedroom, it could have been air movement or even Madeleine moving around just as much as it could have been an intruder.  There is just is no way of being sure.
« Last Edit: September 22, 2016, 08:02:56 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Let's have a close look at what Matt says.
« Reply #35 on: September 22, 2016, 08:03:05 PM »
Rofl
We now have an unpaid childminder....who is that?

 @)(++(*
If Gerry thought there was someone in the kids bedroom while he was doing his check what would that person be called?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline mercury

Re: Let's have a close look at what Matt says.
« Reply #36 on: September 22, 2016, 08:05:03 PM »
If Gerry thought there was someone in the kids bedroom while he was doing his check what would that person be called?
A childminder in your mental universe i suppose

Got some grown up sane places to go to so see u later rofl

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Let's have a close look at what Matt says.
« Reply #37 on: September 22, 2016, 08:07:01 PM »
A childminder in your mental universe i suppose
Maybe we could say "an anonymous unpaid child minder".
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Let's have a close look at what Matt says.
« Reply #38 on: September 22, 2016, 08:30:20 PM »
Maybe we could say "an anonymous unpaid child minder".

Maybe we say, such an individual never existed. 8)-)))

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Let's have a close look at what Matt says.
« Reply #39 on: September 22, 2016, 08:36:11 PM »
Maybe we say, such an individual never existed. 8)-)))
Something like a haunted house where the poltergeist was able to move doors.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Let's have a close look at what Matt says.
« Reply #40 on: September 22, 2016, 08:46:29 PM »
Maybe we say, such an individual never existed. 8)-)))
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?action=post;quote=356254;topic=7635.30;last_msg=356266

Intruder, OK we could debate whether or not there was an intruder, but if there was could we say the intruder was the abductor, or could there be an intruder and an abductor? 
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Let's have a close look at what Matt says.
« Reply #41 on: September 22, 2016, 08:49:40 PM »
In both cases I would call them an intruder.  There is no real way to square the moving door to the children's bedroom, it could have been air movement or even Madeleine moving around just as much as it could have been an intruder.  There is just is no way of being sure.
Sorry John I hadn't noticed your post till later.  I think "intruder" would be the correct technical term.
« Last Edit: September 22, 2016, 08:56:22 PM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Let's have a close look at what Matt says.
« Reply #42 on: September 22, 2016, 09:07:45 PM »
Something like a haunted house where the poltergeist was able to move doors.

Hearsay bittybob, and not verified.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Let's have a close look at what Matt says.
« Reply #43 on: September 22, 2016, 09:08:49 PM »
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?action=post;quote=356254;topic=7635.30;last_msg=356266

Intruder, OK we could debate whether or not there was an intruder, but if there was could we say the intruder was the abductor, or could there be an intruder and an abductor?

We could also say an intruder is a figment of some peoples imagination.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Let's have a close look at what Matt says.
« Reply #44 on: September 22, 2016, 09:28:39 PM »
Sorry John I hadn't noticed your post till later.  I think "intruder" would be the correct technical term.

The witness never reached a conclusion as to why the door moved. It wasn't the child, she hadn't moved. He's sure he left it more closed than he found it though. Therefore someone or something must have moved it. Still, never mind, just go back to the restaurant, leaving the patio door open and your precious children alone in there. Really?

I was once alone in my house with my two children. I was heavily pregnant. I checked the children before going to bed and the attic opening, which was in their room, was open. In the room were two single beds and a cot. I never went to my bedroom, I slept in one of the beds directly under the attic opening just in case someone was somehow up there. No way was I leaving my children alone in that room that night.

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0