McCanns' Embedded Confessions - Statement Analysis ( Richard D Hall release)

[jassi]

I will watch them more than once for sure.

You must have a lot of time on your hands 

[Robittybob1]

Their profession is irrelevant.

So you say but you have no proof of that.

You must have a lot of time on your hands 

Solving the MM case is my full time occupation this year. (I was going to give it 6 months or so and the time is up.) So I have failed (timewise) but I think I made some progress in coming up with the New Theory.

[stephen25000]

So you say but you have no proof of that.

Solving the MM case is my full time occupation this year. (I was going to give it 6 months or so and the time is up.) So I have failed (timewise) but I think I made some progress in coming up with the New Theory.

Why is their profession relevant ?

I hope you are not trying to imply Doctor's are incapable of committing crimes. &%+((£

[ShiningInLuz]

I admit to having watched the whole lot once and that is my limit.

The chap sounds like he is doing a variation of NLP.

The inferences to be gained from which pronoun was used in a given 'statement' left me less impressed than the dogs, and I'm not impressed by the dogs.

[stephen25000]

I admit to having watched the whole lot once and that is my limit.

The chap sounds like he is doing a variation of NLP.

The inferences to be gained from which pronoun was used in a given 'statement' left me less impressed than the dogs, and I'm not impressed by the dogs.

I haven't the time ow, but I will look at his track record as regards cases, after work. Perhaps other posters might want to do this in the meantime.

[Robittybob1]

Why is their profession relevant ?

I hope you are not trying to imply Doctor's are incapable of committing crimes. &%+((£

No I'm implying doctors are trained at making diagnoses.  Looking at the signs and coming to an educated but quickfire conclusion.

[stephen25000]

No I'm implying doctors are trained at making diagnoses.  Looking at the signs and coming to an educated but quickfire conclusion.

Doctors sometimes get diagnoses wrong.

What diagnosis are you referring to in this case ?

[jassi]

Not much sign of cool diagnostic action that night, more like headless chickens.

[ShiningInLuz]

I haven't the time now, but I will look at his track record as regards cases, after work. Perhaps other posters might want to do this in the meantime.

From memory of the video, his work is not admissible as evidence.  It is allegedly used to give police forces pointers and in some cases obtain confessions.  If so, I think getting his track record is going to be problematic.

I wonder how Hall became aware of him.

[misty]

Have you watched them Misty ?

Yes, I watched them immediately after posting the links, Stephen.
Having previously read his analysis of statements from the Deorr Kunz case, I was extremely interested to listen to what he had to say about the McCanns.
IMO it was a mistake to use an interview given by the McCanns 4 years after Madeleine disappeared. It was also a mistake to analyse an isolated interview without first familiarising himself with the accusations made against the McCanns by the PJ during questioning & the subsequent contentious book. Anyone who knows the case pretty well understands that there is no confession of an "accidental sleep-induced fall" embedded in the parents' description of events.
I have also just discovered that Hyatt did an almost identical exercise with another questioner in 2012, the transcript of which is available at http://statement-analysis.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/statement-analysis-mccann-interview-2011.html.
There will be no frothing at the mouth or anything else from McCann supporters but I suspect there will be from other quarters when they realise Hall has spectacularly messed up again. Did he really not check Hyatt's credentials?

[Alice Purjorick]

No I'm implying doctors are trained at making diagnoses.  Looking at the signs and coming to an educated but quickfire conclusion.

As are other professions.

[Alice Purjorick]

Yes, I watched them immediately after posting the links, Stephen.
Having previously read his analysis of statements from the Deorr Kunz case, I was extremely interested to listen to what he had to say about the McCanns.
IMO it was a mistake to use an interview given by the McCanns 4 years after Madeleine disappeared. It was also a mistake to analyse an isolated interview without first familiarising himself with the accusations made against the McCanns by the PJ during questioning & the subsequent contentious book. Anyone who knows the case pretty well understands that there is no confession of an "accidental sleep-induced fall" embedded in the parents' description of events.
I have also just discovered that Hyatt did an almost identical exercise with another questioner in 2012, the transcript of which is available at http://statement-analysis.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/statement-analysis-mccann-interview-2011.html.
There will be no frothing at the mouth or anything else from McCann supporters but I suspect there will be from other quarters when they realise Hall has spectacularly messed up again. Did he really not check Hyatt's credentials?

"Still, a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest".
 

[G-Unit]

As are other professions.

Doctors listen to patients, conduct physical examinations, then guess what may be wrong using their knowledge and experience.

Detectives listen to the witnesses, examine the scene, then guess what may have happened using their knowledge and experience.

Both then look for further evidence to support or disprove their initial assessments.

In this case two doctors broadcast their opinion worldwide, bypassing the detectives and making their work very difficult thereafter. Strangely, Alex Woolfall said they held no such opinion at first, but how he missed the pleas they made in the media to 'whoever has Madeleine' I can't imagine.

[Miss Taken Identity]

Poor RH he tries so hards sometimes...

I skimmed through some of the videos, I am probably being unfair, but I don't think that particular interview was relevent due to the time scale.  I was watching body language and listening to all the interviews which were directly recent to the claim of Maddie being missing. I didn't belive the tapas from day one. and I did become aware that the parents were very quickly distancing themselves from their daughter. 'a little girl is missing' because a sort of slogan. If you look back at them you will notice that. Also the delivery in their interviews is very strange indeed, chortling, smirking, sniggering at the suggestion they were involved with their daughters dissapearance in stead of rage and dispair...

This is a very interesting scenario, I found the link on Blacksmiths: It is a long read, but interesting.
http://unterdenteppichgekehrt.blogspot.co.uk/p/theory-english.html

[Benice]

Poor RH he tries so hards sometimes...

I skimmed through some of the videos, I am probably being unfair, but I don't think that particular interview was relevent due to the time scale.  I was watching body language and listening to all the interviews which were directly recent to the claim of Maddie being missing. I didn't belive the tapas from day one. and I did become aware that the parents were very quickly distancing themselves from their daughter. 'a little girl is missing' because a sort of slogan. If you look back at them you will notice that. Also the delivery in their interviews is very strange indeed, chortling, smirking, sniggering at the suggestion they were involved with their daughters dissapearance in stead of rage and dispair...

This is a very interesting scenario, I found the link on Blacksmiths: It is a long read, but interesting.
http://unterdenteppichgekehrt.blogspot.co.uk/p/theory-english.html

Doing everything they could to keep Madeleine in the public eye - including being interviewed - are not the actions of people who wanted to distance themselves from their daughter imo.

If they had wanted to distance themselves from Madeleine they would have come home and kept their heads down until the case faded into obscurity.    Instead they did everything in their power to keep her in the public's mind and constantly pressed for her case to be re-opened.

IOW they did the exact opposite of distancing themselves.

AIMHO