There's nothing wrong with my comprehension skills Alice, you write posts for your own amusement and assume everyone else knows what the hell you're on about. Mostly though I fear your riddle-me-ree nonsense goes over most people's heads.
You responded to a post that I wrote in reply to someone else claiming Hyatt's view that it was possible to tell if Madeleine had been sexually abused by reading her parents' statements. Your response to my post seemed to suggest that the quote you gave (with no link or name) was sufficient to qualify as the independent research on statement analysis that I asked for in my previous post. It didn't and it wasn't.
Try not to let your determination to get one over on me at every opportunity influence the quality and content of your posts. I think you could probably make quite a valuable contribution to the discussion if you just let it go.
I thought I did in this instance. But to abbreviate and not be abusive or indeed not to try to get one over on you:
I find it droll if not paradoxical that with something like a pseudoscience, some will swear by it while others will swear at it depending upon what suits their argument and/or prejudices* at the time. I find pseudo science just that, pseudo, all of the time. The principle has worked for me so I doubt I will change unless.................................
* in the wider sense of the word.
