McCanns' Embedded Confessions - Statement Analysis ( Richard D Hall release)

[stephen25000]

They have spent plenty of their own money as you must by now know.  It has beenn gone over several times on this forum withy you present

They spent the money that came in for THEM from the libel cases.
They spent the money from Kates book

And it is my bet that they spent any moneys coming to them from TV interviews.  Anyone know?


I should darn well hope that they didn't spend any other of their money on such necessities as getting proper bona fide translations done. 

Are you trying to bankrupt them and deprive the twins of a normal lifestyle, stephen?

It wasn't their own money Sadie.

It was money they were given as a result of their actions, which is quite distasteful, to put it mildly.

You have never answered properly, one simple question.

Why should others pay for the mistakes of the Mccann's ?

Who said I was trying to bankrupt the Mccann's ?

Asking them to pay from their own resources, seems eminently fair, and most right thinking people would say the same as well.

Meanwhile, haven't the Mccanns been trying to bankrupt Amaral ?

You are clearly OK with that.

[Robittybob1]

Do you  read the files that they paid to translate?  Who paid for the translation of the PJ files @ http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TRANSLATIONS.htm commonly known as the McCann files?

[stephen25000]

Do you  read the files that they paid to translate?

Whose money did they use ?

It didn't come from their own resources, did it.

[Robittybob1]

Whose money did they use ?

It didn't come from their own resources, did it.

But we are all benefiting from it. They could have spent the money on something more personal which I'm sure they would have if they were in it for themselves.

[stephen25000]

But we are all benefiting from it. They could have spent the money on something more personal which I'm sure they would have if they were in it for themselves.

How about 'searching' for Madeleine instead.

As to the case benefiting, in what way ?

it certainly hasn't been solved.

[Robittybob1]

How about 'searching' for Madeleine instead.

As to the case benefiting, in what way ?

it certainly hasn't been solved.

Where did you think she was? 
Unless the files had been translated we would not have noted that those servicemen were also into doing burglaries would we?  OK so SY and the PJ have questioned them, but I would say one of them could have easily left the place insecure to get back in, and was more likely to be in there during Gerry's check than was the abductor.

[pathfinder73]

[stephen25000]

Where did you think she was? 
Unless the files had been translated we would not have noted that those servicemen were also into doing burglaries would we?  OK so SY and the PJ have questioned them, but I would say one of them could have easily left the place insecure to get back in, and was more likely to be in there during Gerry's check than was the abductor.

The PJ were and are in charge of the investigation.

Not the McCann's and not OG.

[Alice Purjorick]

The PJ were and are in charge of the investigation.

Not the McCann's and not OG.

Look on the positive side Stevo.
The Met, EssWhy, O.G. call them what you will spent in excess of 50,000 man hours on this just going through the files
A man year is 1800 manhours so if Robbity is working on his own and actaully takes some kip then:
50,000/1800 = 27ish  =>  only another 27 years of Robbity's NewTheory.....

[stephen25000]

Look on the positive side Stevo.
The Met, EssWhy, O.G. call them what you will spent in excess of 50,000 man hours on this just going through the files
A man year is 1800 manhours so if Robbity is working on his own and actaully takes some kip then:
50,000/1800 = 27ish  =>  only another 27 years of Robbity's NewTheory.....

Hasn't Bob dedicated his life to solving this case ?

[parapono]

But we are all benefiting from it. They could have spent the money on something more personal which I'm sure they would have if they were in it for themselves.

Errr we are not 'benefiting' from it at all, sorry. The translation the McCanns alledgedly paid for was not made available to the public. The same goes for the official translation that Operation Grange ordered and paid for. Out of UK taxpayers pockets.
With all these FOI requests flying around it keeps surprising me nobody asks for those translations to be made public.
It would put all this mistranslation-humbug to rest. All imo of course.

[sadie]

It wasn't their own money Sadie.

It was money they were given as a result of their actions, which is quite distasteful, to put it mildly.

You have never answered properly, one simple question.

Why should others pay for the mistakes of the Mccann's ?

Who said I was trying to bankrupt the Mccann's ?

Asking them to pay from their own resources, seems eminently fair, and most right thinking people would say the same as well.

Meanwhile, haven't the Mccanns been trying to bankrupt Amaral ?

You are clearly OK with that.

If someone libelled you, tried to ruin your good name and worse prevent the search for your missing child.  Then it went to Court, and say you won £500,000 as compensation for their libel against you, who would get the money?

Would that money be yours or someone elses?   Please explain yourself stephen.



Would it be distasteful to you that someone put out a multitude of disinformation about you and tried to implicate you in the death of your child ... or would that be alright by you ?


Kate went to the considerable trouble of writing a good book about the Madeleine case.
It was a great success and she earned hundreds of thousands of pounds for it.  Was that money hers to spend as she wished?


Kate and Gerry chose to forgo the monies that were rightfully theirs to try and find their missing daughter.  Are you saying that they had no right to do that?


I wonder what you would do with such money?   

Probably keep it for yourself as the dishonest Amaral and his criminal friend Cristavao have with the monies they earned writing their books?  The writings, in their cases, were biased and libellous by British standards




So kate and Gerry gave huge sums [£1 million plus ?] of their own money to help the search ... and you are bemoaning them ?



What a lot you are saying about yourself stephen.  And it is not very nice tbh.

[stephen25000]

If someone libelled you, tried to ruin your good name and worse prevent the search for your missing child.  Then it went to Court, and say you won £500,000 as compensation for their libel against you, who would get the money?

Would that money be yours or someone elses?   Please explain yourself stephen.



Would it be distasteful to you that someone put out a multitude of disinformation about you and tried to implicate you in the death of your child ... or would that be alright by you ?


Kate went to the considerable trouble of writing a good book about the Madeleine case.
It was a great success and she earned hundreds of thousands of pounds for it.  Was that money hers to spend as she wished?


Kate and Gerry chose to forgo the monies that were rightfully theirs to try and find their missing daughter.  Are you saying that they had no right to do that?


I wonder what you would do with such money?   

Probably keep it for yourself as the dishonest Amaral and his criminal friend Cristavao have with the monies they earned writing their books?  The writings, in their cases, were biased and libellous by British standards




So kate and Gerry gave huge sums [£1 million plus ?] of their own money to help the search ... and you are bemoaning them ?



What a lot you are saying about yourself stephen.  And it is not very nice tbh.

That reply in fact says everything about you.

None of this would have happened if they had taken care of their children, as good parents would.

They got their money, and IMHO blood money on the back of their incompetent parenting.

The fact is Sadie, it wasn't money they earned, it was money from the disappearance of their daughter.

You should be ashamed with yourself for supporting that.

IMHO naturally.

[Mr Gray]

That reply in fact says everything about you.

None of this would have happened if they had taken care of their children, as good parents would.

They got their money, and IMHO blood money on the back of their incompetent parenting.

The fact is Sadie, it wasn't money they earned, it was money from the disappearance of their daughter.

You should be ashamed with yourself for supporting that.

IMHO naturally.

you should be ashamed of yourself for continually attacking parents who have lost a child. Almost ten years now a nd you and others still criticising....totally abnormal behaviour imo

[ferryman]

That reply in fact says everything about you.

None of this would have happened if they had taken care of their children, as good parents would.

They got their money, and IMHO blood money on the back of their incompetent parenting.

The fact is Sadie, it wasn't money they earned, it was money from the disappearance of their daughter.

You should be ashamed with yourself for supporting that.

IMHO naturally.

Having (thank goodness!) abandoned theMcCannsdunsomethingdreadfultoMadeleineandcovereditup, some continue to drone on remorselessly that the McCanns' childcare arrangements (narrowly) failed to thwart an abuction.

Depressing beyond words.