McCanns' Embedded Confessions - Statement Analysis ( Richard D Hall release)

[slartibartfast]

Perhaps it is of more relevance that the files are used as one would have assumed their original purpose should have been ... to assist in solving what happened to Madeleine McCann leading to her recovery.

Why do you think the McCanns should have more interest in endowing the hostile feeding frenzy of those with an apparent vested interest in Madeleine's death by publishing details of the ongoing case hoping to find her alive?

Active investigations just are not engineered to appease the lowest common denominator ... the aim of this particular one is to do what was not done ... and Madeleine McCann is the focus.

If the McCanns think that their translations show that there are no major errors in the online translations, then that makes sense.

[pathfinder73]

That he confirms the truth of the statements made previously on 4 May 2007 he being available here to provide any further clarifications.

Despite what he said in his previous statements, he states now and with certainty, that he left with KATE by the rear door which he consequently closed but did not lock given that that is only possible from the inside. Referring to the front door, while he is certain that it was closed it is unlikely that it was locked as [because] they had left by the rear door.

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN-10MAY.htm

"We'd never lied about anything - not to the police, not to the media, not to anyone else.  But now we found ourselves in one of those tricky situations where we just didn't seem to have a choice." Madeleine

[Brietta]

If the McCanns think that their translations show that there are no major errors in the online translations, then that makes sense.

Quite possibly the content of the on line translations, or the people who set great store by them is not even of passing interest to the McCanns.

Their interest is in the accuracy of the materials in their possession as a means to the end of discovering what happened to Madeleine McCann and where she is now.

[slartibartfast]

Quite possibly the content of the on line translations, or the people who set great store by them is not even of passing interest to the McCanns.

Their interest is in the accuracy of the materials in their possession as a means to the end of discovering what happened to Madeleine McCann and where she is now.

So it's only the supporters it bothers?

[Brietta]

So it's only the supporters it bothers?

I'm terribly sorry, I really do not have a clue what you are talking about ... much as I haven't a clue what "embedded confessions" might be.

[Eleanor]

I'm terribly sorry, I really do not have a clue what you are talking about ... much as I haven't a clue what "embedded confessions" might be.

It means that if they say they didn't do it then they did do it.  It's that old Reverse Speach back again.

[slartibartfast]

I'm terribly sorry, I really do not have a clue what you are talking about ... much as I haven't a clue what "embedded confessions" might be.

Supporters have always made a big deal about the translation errors and yet you say the McCanns aren't bothered.

[Eleanor]

Supporters have always made a big deal about the translation errors and yet you say the McCanns aren't bothered.

Has there been a Court Case?  That will never happen.  But you could guarantee that the On Line Translations wouldn't even figure.

Operation Grange and The McCanns have the accredited correct ones, which they are under no obligation to produce  On Line.

[ShiningInLuz]

Has there been a Court Case?  That will never happen.  But you could guarantee that the On Line Translations wouldn't even figure.

Operation Grange and The McCanns have the accredited correct ones, which they are under no obligation to produce  On Line.

It would interesting to know if KM and OG have identical versions, or if OG did its own translation, in which case one would expect two 'official' versions.

[Eleanor]

It would interesting to know if KM and OG have identical versions, or if OG did its own translation, in which case one would expect two 'official' versions.

Not really.  I doubt that Operation Grange would have used The McCann's translations.  But Accredited Translations have to be absolutely correct, which is why they cost so much money.

These people are trained by the same standards, and are open to losing their accreditation if they get it wrong.

[jassi]

Has there been a Court Case?  That will never happen.  But you could guarantee that the On Line Translations wouldn't even figure.

Operation Grange and The McCanns have the accredited correct ones, which they are under no obligation to produce  On Line.

Where are Wikileaks when you need them?

[Alice Purjorick]

"Certified Translations in the UK
As the translation industry is unregulated, ANYONE can make claims as to the accuracy of a particular translation and therefore it is important to check the credentials of the certifier carefully".


http://www.londontranslations.co.uk/faq/basics/certified-translation-mean/
http://www.iti.org.uk/

[Brietta]

It would interesting to know if KM and OG have identical versions, or if OG did its own translation, in which case one would expect two 'official' versions.

Not forgetting version one ... inclusion of the Policia Judicairia version makes three by my calculation.  All of which will no doubt include the pages which were never released on the DVD for the amateur translators to do with as they would.

I find the arrogance of those who feel entitlement to have possession of these official documents astounding.  They relate to the investigation into the case of a missing little girl who may now be a teenager.
That there is no inhibition in the expectation that the files of a live investigation should be published (an absolutely unheard of suggestion or occurrence) for antagonistic perusal is an indication of exactly the lack of esteem in which Madeleine McCann is held in by some.

[jassi]

Not forgetting version one ... inclusion of the Policia Judicairia version makes three by my calculation.  All of which will no doubt include the pages which were never released on the DVD for the amateur translators to do with as they would.

I find the arrogance of those who feel entitlement to have possession of these official documents astounding.  They relate to the investigation into the case of a missing little girl who may now be a teenager.
That there is no inhibition in the expectation that the files of a live investigation should be published (an absolutely unheard of suggestion or occurrence) for antagonistic perusal is an indication of exactly the lack of esteem in which Madeleine McCann is held in by some.

More wishful thinking, than expectation.
No doubt you would refuse to take a peek if they were available to all   

[Brietta]

More wishful thinking, than expectation.
No doubt you would refuse to take a peek if they were available to all   

Believe it or not, Jassie, I really do not have the slightest interest or need to read the files ... my interest lies in police investigators using them to best effect to find Madeleine McCann.