McCanns' Embedded Confessions - Statement Analysis ( Richard D Hall release)

[stephen25000]

The link is to what the parents said Stephen,   April Jones mother said they only let April go out later than normal because she did well in school,   she didn't have to say this did she?   It was said not because she was looking to cover herself but because she was feeling guilty and blaming herself,  which she had no need to do.

Kate McCann said she was close by the apartment,  not because she was covering herself but because she was blaming herself,  so not thinking about herself but blaming herself for Madeleine going missing,  so she was thinking of Madeleine and not herself,  she was guilty.

You listed to the tapes didn't you?   He said that because Kate said 'then she opened her mouth'  she was finding fault with Madeleine,  the link is the tapes,  the second one I think.   He makes out that they had something against Madeleine from her birth.

How does the April Jones case bare relation to the Mccann case ?

The circumstances are entirely different.

Now tell me how do you know whether Hyatt is right or wrong in his assertions ?

Do you know the Mccanns personally ?

[Lace]

How does the April Jones case bare relation to the Mccann case ?

The circumstances are entirely different.

Now tell me how do you know whether Hyatt is right or wrong in his assertions ?

Do you know the Mccanns personally ?

I explained how there is a relation between what the two mothers said,  you are choosing to ignore.

I am saying what I think is wrong with what Hyatt says,  do you agree or not?

[stephen25000]

I explained how there is a relation between what the two mothers said,  you are choosing to ignore.

I am saying what I think is wrong with what Hyatt says,  do you agree or not?

I am comparing the cases.

There is no comparison.

As to Hyatt, that is his opinion.

[Lace]

I am comparing the cases.

There is no comparison.

As to Hyatt, that is his opinion.

There you go then,  no thoughts from you.

[stephen25000]

Nothing to do with the heading of this thread Stephen.

Just wait and see.

[Lace]

Just wait and see.

What,  Wyatt is going to have something to do with it?  or maybe Hall?

[stephen25000]

What,  Wyatt is going to have something to do with it?  or maybe Hall?

it's Hyatt Lace.

[Robittybob1]

Just wait and see.

Is that based on a premonition or just some timey wimey stuff?

[stephen25000]

Is that based on a premonition or just some timey wimey stuff?

No, that 's your forte.

There is a pun with the last word of the sentence. Let's see if you get it.

Meanwhile I don't claim to make psychic predictions. I leave that to fakes like Acorah. 

[Robittybob1]

No, that 's your forte.

There is a pun with the last word of the sentence. Let's see if you get it.

Meanwhile I don't claim to make psychic predictions. I leave that to fakes like Acorah. 

I'm glad you are not persuaded by fakes.  Therefore you won't need to ask why me?   It sounded like a prediction when you said "wait and see",  but maybe it was really "what will be will be".

[ShiningInLuz]

Bradley Walsh of the Chase.

An irritating turn of phrase.  If you was to win some money tonight, what would you do with it?

Tonight he got two right and two wrong.  In the first 2, he said 'If you were to win some money tonight ...' Then he reverted to type and contestants 3 and 4 got ' If you was to win some money tonight ...'

What is Bradley guilty of?  I make him guilty of poor English, nothing more.

[Alice Purjorick]

Why what?  Find me any credible scientific research done on the subject that confirms the validity of statement analysis then.  Note the word "credible".    This Hyatt claims he will be able to deduce whether or not Madeleine was sexually abused by analysing statements made by her parents.  Does that sound plausible to you?

1: Does this pass muster master?: My current research involves interviewing to detect deception, where the main focus is to elicit information and maximise differences between liars and truth tellers’ accounts. This research is very relevant for detecting how people engaged in ‘high stake’ deception respond verbally and non-verbally in a variety of scenarios . My work involves cooperation with national and international governments and police. I am a member of the European consortium of Psychological Research on Deception Detection (E-prodd). The consortium utilises cutting edge research from laboratories across Europe to optimise the detection of deception in serious crime.
2:That phraseology suggests there are legions of Hyatts but only this one.................................

[Alfie]

1: Does this pass muster master?: My current research involves interviewing to detect deception, where the main focus is to elicit information and maximise differences between liars and truth tellers’ accounts. This research is very relevant for detecting how people engaged in ‘high stake’ deception respond verbally and non-verbally in a variety of scenarios . My work involves cooperation with national and international governments and police. I am a member of the European consortium of Psychological Research on Deception Detection (E-prodd). The consortium utilises cutting edge research from laboratories across Europe to optimise the detection of deception in serious crime.
2:That phraseology suggests there are legions of Hyatts but only this one.................................

Why am I not surprised that you are defending this junk science and its proponents. If you think it would be possible to establish whether or not Madeleine had been sexually abused by analysing witness statements then that's your prerogative.  Perhaps we could have some independent research that backs up this claim, not a testimonial from a practitioner himself/herself (no link provided so no idea who wrote that)?

[Alice Purjorick]

Why am I not surprised that you are defending this junk science and its proponents. If you think it would be possible to establish whether or not Madeleine had been sexually abused by analysing witness statements then that's your prerogative. Perhaps we could have some independent research that backs up this claim, not a testimonial from a practitioner himself/herself (no link provided so no idea who wrote that)?

I never said anything about sexually abused nordid I say anything about defending junk science. You maitained it was junk science globally before sexual abuse was introduced into the equation. Your comprehension is truly appalling or an attempt to divert.
Now don't try to start a flame war, with your customary name calling or nit picking bo.

Try Dr Sharon Leal, you must remember her.

http://www.port.ac.uk/department-of-psychology/staff/dr-sharon-leal.html

[pathfinder73]