McCanns' Embedded Confessions - Statement Analysis ( Richard D Hall release)

[Lace]

I don't know how my post got posted twice,  I did edit it so maybe I pressed something I shouldn't have.  Eleanor could you be so kind as to delete the copy of my post please?   Thanks in advance.

[Lace]

did you think it was that good .....you posted it twice ...3 times with this....

you don't know it is rubbish ..you only think it is ......

so he would be ok .if he was saying what you wanted to hear.............

well not as gullible ...as believing the abduction ....on just the mccs say so lace

No,  not with just the McCann's say so,  I studied the Police files and statements,  the timeline etc.  and came to my own conclusion.

[ferryman]

Fallibility of memory is not a welcome fact to some sceptics in the McCann case. 

I have posted the following many times, but AFAIK no sceptic has ever 'acknowledged them'.   They would much rather believe that discrepancies in statements mean that someone must be lying - and therefore are proof of deception.

QUOTE: from police officer interviewing JT:

4078    “You know, we can take a statement from people, if an incident happened outside and there was a group of people watching it, everybody would have a different take on what they had seen”.
Unquote.
 

Quote from Steve Retford.

In a crime situation memory is influenced by many factors such as stress, the presence of a weapon and even just the desire to help police solve the crime.

"Police know how fallible the memory can be," says Steve Retford, a former head of the investigative skills unit at GMP and now specialist interviewing adviser with the force.

"They also know this is usually not through mischievousness on the part of the witnesses, but through stress and shock."

Take the case of Jean Charles de Menezes, shot at Stockwell Tube station in 2005 by police who mistook him for a suicide bomber.

Eyewitnesses said he had vaulted a ticket barrier when running away from the police. In fact it was later shown by CCTV that Mr Menezes had walked through the barriers, having picked up a free newspaper, and only ran when he saw his train arriving.
End quote

AIMHO

The same eyewitnesses also 'saw' Mr Menezes wearing a thick, knee-length coat with leads trailing underneath.

In fact, he was wearing light-weight denim jacket with not a lead in sight.

[stephen25000]

I was listening to an interview with Kate and she said after the file had been release they had to pay over 100,000 pounds to get the file translated and then she spent every spare minute going through it reading every file. 
That really sounded like the work of a guilty party - NOT.

Perhaps you should study some cases where the actual guilty party or parties have tried through various means to divert an investigation.

By the way, was the £100,000 , the Mccann's own money or had it been part of the donations to them ?

As far as I have heard, the Mccann's have never spent a penny from their own resources to 'search' for their daughter. Perhaps you can prove me wrong.

P.S. I don't count any money obtained from the book. That should have never been required in the first place, if they had done their jobs as parents properly.

AIMHO of course.

[stephen25000]

The same eyewitnesses also 'saw' Mr Menezes wearing a thick, knee-length coat with leads trailing underneath.

In fact, he was wearing light-weight denim jacket with not a lead in sight.

Just remind me of what happened a few days prior to his death.

[Robittybob1]

Perhaps you should study some cases where the actual guilty party or parties have tried through various means to divert an investigation.

By the way, was the £100,000 , the Mccann's own money or had it been part of the donations to them ?

As far as I have heard, the Mccann's have never spent a penny from their own resources to 'search' for their daughter. Perhaps you can prove me wrong.

P.S. I don't count any money obtained from the book. That should have never been required in the first place, if they had done their jobs as parents properly.

AIMHO of course.

Nothing I could say will make an iota of difference to you.

[jassi]

Perhaps you should study some cases where the actual guilty party or parties have tried through various means to divert an investigation.

By the way, was the £100,000 , the Mccann's own money or had it been part of the donations to them ?

As far as I have heard, the Mccann's have never spent a penny from their own resources to 'search' for their daughter. Perhaps you can prove me wrong.

P.S. I don't count any money obtained from the book. That should have never been required in the first place, if they had done their jobs as parents properly.

AIMHO of course.

Now don't be silly 

[stephen25000]

Nothing I could say will make an iota of difference to you.

It would be, if it was logically argued, and backed by facts/cites.

[stephen25000]

Now don't be silly

Indeed Jassi.

After all, they have funded everything from their own resources.

Naughty me for implying otherwise.

[Robittybob1]

4 years after the event ... embedded confession - BS. That fact hasn't made you think twice has it Stephen?

[stephen25000]

4 years after the event ... embedded confession - BS. That fact hasn't made you think twice has it Stephen?

I've watched interviews of the Mccanns from closely after  Madeleine disappeared.

Do you get the picture ?

[Robittybob1]

I've watched interviews of the Mccanns from closely after  Madeleine disappeared.

Do you get the picture ?

And have you applied Peter Hyatt's techniques to them too?  What was your analysis?

[stephen25000]

And have you applied Peter Hyatt's techniques to them too?  What was your analysis?

I have watched the interviews with Hyatt.

I have also used my decades of training, and experience dealing with  people.

As for the rest, as I said a while ago, all in good time.

I await the result of the Supreme Court decision.

[Robittybob1]

I have watched the interviews with Hyatt.

I have also used my decades of training, and experience dealing with  people.

As for the rest, as I said a while ago, all in good time.

I await the result of the Supreme Court decision.

You may wait for the decision but I have yet to see whether the courts there in Portugal are completely non-political.
Tomorrow for me - midnight here.  Nite.

[jassi]

You may wait for the decision but I have yet to see whether the courts there in Portugal are completely non-political.
Tomorrow for me - midnight here.  Nite.

I won't matter if it is political or not, the decision, whatever it is, will stand.