You posted.
I replied with.
Express 2016:For balance there are course other news outlets available.
How you can deduce from that I don't believe the MET have any new leads I don't know,but whilst acknowledging there may well be remember the MET aren't giving a running commentary so nothing is specific,its all made up by the media,from the beeb website.
So a source for the line of inquiry wouldn't go amiss.
There is a source, it is unnamed, you can choose to believe the entire story is made up, that's your prerogative. I don't believe that all unnamed sources that are used in newspaper reports are fictional, I think that line of reasoning is very silly. I look at this story, I see that extra funding has been given, I rationalise that there must be a good reason for this, a good reason is cited (a specific individual they want to trace says an "insider"), that seems logical, certainly a lot more logical than other reasons cited here this morning such as it's being done to cover up bad publicity for the government.