When will the online persecution of the McCanns end?

[sadie]

There was that caring couple that consoled Madeleine the night before she went missing.  Did they come back the following night and find that she had an accident and in a panic took her to LuzDoc, but found it shut.  By Smithman (the initial Smithman before the two E-fits were made).
OR
There was that caring couple that consoled Madeleine the night before she went missing.  Did they come back the following night and found Madeleine lying outside the apartment and thought she had an accident and in a panic took her to LuzDoc, but found it shut.  By Smithman (the initial Smithman before the two E-fits were made).
Somehow they get into a state that they can't give her back.

To go to Luzdocs, Smithman had to turn right out of Rua d'Escola on to Rua April 25.

He didn't, he turned left or maybe went straight on.  That is proved in Aoifes statement where she describes Smithman coming towards her on her left side.  In other words Smithman had his back to Luzdoc.  He was walking away from it.


No, you are definitely wrong on this one Rob

[Mr Gray]

You can't prove that she was abducted by a stranger, so we're all in the same boat it seems.

You use the word prove
What level of proof do you expect
Absolute
Criminal
Civil
You need to be more precise
Fact is you have not even considered that important question

[jassi]

I doubt there will ever be any proof of anything -other than that she disappeared.

[Alfie]

Indeed panic isn't a good mode but panic is never a choice.

Just because you have evaded justice for a time does not necessarily mean you will evade justice forever. Ask Billy Dunlop.

In order for your theory to turn out to be true it will mean that a series of more than a dozen highly improbable events occurred in quick succession.  On that basis anyone with an ounce of sense would have to conclude it didn't happen the way you think it did.  So, we need another theory.  Can anyone oblige?

[faithlilly]

In order for your theory to turn out to be true it will mean that a series of more than a dozen highly improbable events occurred in quick succession.  On that basis anyone with an ounce of sense would have to conclude it didn't happen the way you think it did.  So, we need another theory.  Can anyone oblige?

Madeleine being abducted in the circumstances you believe happened is also improbable but you still believe it happened. As your post detailing those dozen improbable events was deleted perhaps you could message it to me and we can discuss it further.

[Alfie]

Indeed panic isn't a good mode but panic is never a choice.

Just because you have evaded justice for a time does not necessarily mean you will evade justice forever. Ask Billy Dunlop.

I've looked up billy Dunlop and it seems he was tried twice and both times the jury couldn't decide if he'd done it.  It was only through the dogged determination of the victim's mother never to give up on her child that justice was eventually done, and only then after he confesed.   Apart from the mother's determination being similar to Kate McCann's own determined fight for justice for her child I don't really see the parallels.

[faithlilly]

I've looked up billy Dunlop and it seems he was tried twice and both times the jury couldn't decide if he'd done it.  It was only through the dogged determination of the victim's mother never to give up on her child that justice was eventually done, and only then after he confesed.   Apart from the mother's determination being similar to Kate McCann's own determined fight for justice for her child I don't really see the parallels.

Of course you do.

[Alfie]

Madeleine being abducted in the circumstances you believe happened is also improbable but you still believe it happened. As your post detailing those dozen improbable events was deleted perhaps you could message it to me and we can discuss it further.

There was an opportunity for Madeleine to have been abducted by a stranger.  Slartibartfast has even described how and when it may have occurred and it only took a couple of lines to describe.  Completely straight-forward, simple explanation, require no convoluted conspiracies, cover-ups, re-positionings, nothing.  I will PM you your theory and discuss it with you too, but the minute you get uppity and nasty with me, the discussion ends.  I hope that's understood.

[Alfie]

Of course you do.

No I don't.  You claim the McCanns acted on panic.  Then you introduce Billy Dunlop who as far as I'm aware set out to deliberately murder then rape a young woman after he'd killed her in her own home, now perhaps you could tell me what are the parallels as you see them?

[faithlilly]

There was an opportunity for Madeleine to have been abducted by a stranger.  Slartibartfast has even described how and when it may have occurred and it only took a couple of lines to describe.  Completely straight-forward, simple explanation, require no convoluted conspiracies, cover-ups, re-positionings, nothing.  I will PM you your theory and discuss it with you too, but the minute you get uppity and nasty with me, the discussion ends.  I hope that's understood.

The actual abduction would be simple, the number of events which  made it possible rather more implausible.

As to your last sentence the same rules of engagement apply to you.

[ferryman]

Amaral claims Maddie fell off the sofa and died
The man is an idiot if he thinks that is possible

And a still bigger idiot for proclaiming the possibility as if 'fact' without a shred of evidence to support it.

[stephen25000]

And a still bigger idiot for proclaiming the possibility as if 'fact' without a shred of evidence to support it.

...and  were the idiots in this case , at it's onset ?

Tough question.

[Robittybob1]

So an abduction

Would you not call this "an abduction" for they take her, don't own up and either keep her or give her away to someone else.

There was that caring couple that consoled Madeleine the night before she went missing.  Did they come back the following night and found Madeleine lying outside the apartment and thought she had an accident and in a panic took her to LuzDoc, but found it shut.  By Smithman (the initial Smithman before the two E-fits were made).
Somehow they get into a state that they can't give her back.

I suppose it matters who opened the window and raised the blinds.  Was this done by the "caring couple" or someone else?

[ferryman]

...and  were the idiots in this case , at it's onset ?

Tough question.

Sharpening their virtual 'pens' to pour out on-line vitriol and h*te (mostly)

[stephen25000]

Sharpening their virtual 'pens' to pour out on-line vitriol and h*te (mostly)

Really ?

...and what of the hate emanating from the Mccanns ?

Have you forgotten ?