When will the online persecution of the McCanns end?

[Brietta]

It is self evident that SY have not found either how Madeleine disappeared from the apartment, let alone find what happened to her afterwards.

'Redwood said the assumption that Madeleine was abducted "may not follow with all our thinking" on the case.'

DCI Redwood has been retired for some time.
His successor is still working Madeleine McCann's case ... as are the Policia Judicairia.
There is absolutely no way an internet poster can have any conception about how far the authorities have progressed Madeleine's still active case.

There are two active police investigations on Madeleine's disappearance being worked; neither of which involve investigation of her parents or their friends other than as witnesses.

Yet there is still a contingent which prefers to fly in the face of the investigative prowess of two National police forces perhaps because they have invested so much vitriol over the years into the cowardly on-line persecution of Madeleine's parents?
Intriguing that they have allowed the rest of the world to pass them by with their adherence to and propagation of discredited theories.  For example, in a recent post on this thread you mentioned "dogs".  WOW!

[stephen25000]

DCI Redwood has been retired for some time.
His successor is still working Madeleine McCann's case ... as are the Policia Judicairia.
There is absolutely no way an internet poster can have any conception about how far the authorities have progressed Madeleine's still active case.

There are two active police investigations on Madeleine's disappearance being worked; neither of which involve investigation of her parents or their friends other than as witnesses.

Yet there is still a contingent which prefers to fly in the face of the investigative prowess of two National police forces perhaps because they have invested so much vitriol over the years into the cowardly on-line persecution of Madeleine's parents?
Intriguing that they have allowed the rest of the world to pass them by with their adherence to and propagation of discredited theories.  For example, in a recent post on this thread you mentioned "dogs".  WOW!

Dream on.

The cause of Madeleine's disappearance and fate remains undetermined.

So when will you say abduction again ?

[Robittybob1]

Dream on.

The cause of Madeleine's disappearance and fate remains undetermined.

So when will you say abduction again ?

So why do you keep hassling the McCanns ...

[stephen25000]

So why do you keep hassling the McCanns ...

Why do you support them ?

Haven't you worked out yet , I don't believe them and the their story of abduction.

[Robittybob1]

Why do you support them ?

Haven't you worked out yet , I don't believe them and the their story of abduction.

What makes you think I support them.

[Alfie]

Nice to see the spirit of Christmas and goodwill to all men pervading this thread....

[Mr Gray]

Nice to see the spirit of Christmas and goodwill to all men pervading this thread....

Yes
I'm sure I Ì ran out of gin on xmas day Stephen would accept the need to leave the kids alone whilst I drove to the nearest wine lodge to pick up further supplies

[stephen25000]

Yet more wind prevails from certain quarters.

[G-Unit]

The McCanns were not at home. and there is no evidence that they ever did leave their children alone and go out while they were at home.          Whether you agree with it or not  -  leaving your children asleep in their room and going out is an acceptable practice for people on holiday and has been for decades.   And parents are not prosecuted for choosing that form of childcare - be it via the listening method of checking or by the use of baby alarms, whilst they are on holiday.

Like it or not  - those are the facts.

Singling the McCanns out as it they are the only parents who have ever chosen that type of childcare on holiday is to pretend that those facts  - and those other parents don't exist.   And that is plainly untrue.

IMO

Oh dear. Are people really so lacking in comprehension that all those advisory bodies need to add a footnote explaining what they mean by 'home'?

For the slow on the uptake 'home' in this context is a dwelling place where you and your children are based either permanently or temporarily. Even if you stay overnight at a friend's 'home' you shouldn't all go out and leave small children alone.

The difference between using a service which is offered as part of the price of a holiday and inventing something yourself is obvious to me.

When you pay for a service you expect it to work. If it doesn't work as advertised you are entitled to redress because you have paid for something you didn't get. The onus is on the service provider to make sure the service is delivered.

In this case a listening service was not offered because the resort was unsuitable.

Therefore the method of childcare adopted by certain guests was not something recommended or offered by the holiday providers.

Therefore it's plainly untrue that they were doing the same as holidaymakers who use an officially sanctioned listening service, despite the unceasing efforts to persuade people that they were. 

[Mr Gray]

Yet more wind prevails from certain quarters.

I'm the only one talking any sense

[stephen25000]

Oh dear. Are people really so lacking in comprehension that all those advisory bodies need to add a footnote explaining what they mean by 'home'?

For the slow on the uptake 'home' in this context is a dwelling place where you and your children are based either permanently or temporarily. Even if you stay overnight at a friend's 'home' you shouldn't all go out and leave small children alone.

The difference between using a service which is offered as part of the price of a holiday and inventing something yourself is obvious to me.

When you pay for a service you expect it to work. If it doesn't work as advertised you are entitled to redress because you have paid for something you didn't get. The onus is on the service provider to make sure the service is delivered.

In this case a listening service was not offered because the resort was unsuitable.

Therefore the method of childcare adopted by certain guests was not something recommended or offered by the holiday providers.

Therefore it's plainly untrue that they were doing the same as holidaymakers who use an officially sanctioned listening service, despite the unceasing efforts to persuade people that they were. 

Exactly G-Unit.

Why are some so blinded by their support for the McCann's to admit the truth.

Meanwhile anyone who doesn't realize or admit the McCann's had help through their contacts in government are seriously short changed in the currency department. 

[Mr Gray]

Exactly G-Unit.

Why are some so blinded by their support for the McCann's to admit the truth.

The truth
That Gerry McCann is protected by the government because of his role in Comare...,lol lol. Lol

[Alice Purjorick]

DCI Redwood has been retired for some time.
His successor is still working Madeleine McCann's case ... as are the Policia Judicairia.
There is absolutely no way an internet poster can have any conception about how far the authorities have progressed Madeleine's still active case.

There are two active police investigations on Madeleine's disappearance being worked; neither of which involve investigation of her parents or their friends other than as witnesses.

Yet there is still a contingent which prefers to fly in the face of the investigative prowess of two National police forces perhaps because they have invested so much vitriol over the years into the cowardly on-line persecution of Madeleine's parents?
Intriguing that they have allowed the rest of the world to pass them by with their adherence to and propagation of discredited theories.  For example, in a recent post on this thread you mentioned "dogs".  WOW!

Are you asking us to believe that two police forces with live investigations are taking you, an internet poster, into their confidence  about even the broad nature of their inquiries?

[slartibartfast]

That is your opinion, and you are entitled to it.  As you have voiced it on here enough times to qualify for the Guinness Book of Records imo -  it is impossible not to realise it.    What you fail to realise is that other people have different opinions to yours and they too are entitled to them.

I very much  doubt if any parent who have themselves adopted the listening form of childcare or who have used baby alarms as babysitters on holiday would dream of condemning the McCanns.       Full stop.

AIMHO

Why do you always conflate checking and baby listeners?

[Mr Gray]

Why do you always conflate checking and baby listeners?

Because poster continually state the guidelines but want to ignore the fact that hotel listening services which are perfectly legal ignore the guidelines
What's your take on that