Is this a reasonable objection?

[Robittybob1]

I have limited information as to when the shutter was raised and the window opened.  That it was is not the question.  It is when?

Not even a hunch or a favourite time?

[Robittybob1]

I know what you have said, but have seen no evidence that it's true. Suggesting that Silvia deliberately didn't translate what Kate said is quite unfounded.

Please explain why a group of doctors didn't insist on getting the twins checked out, if, as Kate suggests, they thought they may have been given an unknown substance to sedate them? I thought that was drummed into them during their training?

I thought you even suggested it was a possibility.
you said "Kate's report of their interaction with the GNR in 'Madeleine';
I reported my fears that all three children could have been sedated.
Did the GNR officers totally ignore this? Did Silvia, a mother herself, totally ignore it?"
Or were you quoting Kate entirely?
In which case Kate suggests it rather than you.

To ignore someone's request is to do it deliberately.

[Robittybob1]

I can explain exactly why
The fact that the twins vital signs were normal meant that they were not in danger and any sedative was wearing off

Even if that is true they couldn't be sure if they were going to become progressively more sedate.  Are you suggesting the doctors knew when and what had been administered to the twins?

[Mr Gray]

I have limited information as to when the shutter was raised and the window opened.  That it was is not the question.  It is when?

You are totally wrong....What is critical is who raised the shutter
We know that none of the tapas was responsible according to their statements
So are they all lying... of course not
So that leaves a third party
If we knew that we would understand a lot more
Would you not agree

[jassi]

You are totally wrong....What is critical is who raised the shutter
We know that none of the tapas was responsible according to their statements
So are they all lying... of course not
So that leaves a third party
If we knew that we would understand a lot more
Would you not agree

Only they can answer that.

[Mr Gray]

Only they can answer that.

They have

[jassi]

They have

Really?  Have any of them made sworn statements that they are telling the truth ?

[Robittybob1]

They have

What just accept and never question as to whether anyone is lying?

[Mr Gray]

What just accept and never question as to whether anyone is lying?

Just because I believe them does not mean I simply accept that they are telling the truth
Looking at all the availability evidence so believe the McCanns are telling the truth

[Mr Gray]

Really?  Have any of them made sworn statements that they are telling the truth ?

Would it make a scrap of difference to you
None of the tapas has ever questioned the anductipn

[jassi]

Would it make a scrap of difference to you
None of the tapas has ever questioned the anductipn

?

[Robittybob1]

Just because I believe them does not mean I simply accept that they are telling the truth
Looking at all the availability evidence so believe the McCanns are telling the truth

Definitely the focus has been on the McCanns.  But how can you eliminate all the others from opening the shutters etc. just based on their statements?

?

Abduction.

[Mr Gray]

?

Ever heard of a mobile phone

[Mr Gray]

Definitely the focus has been on the McCanns.  But how can you eliminate all the others from opening the shutters etc. just based on their statements?Abduction.

Thank you for helping the less able out

Any suggestion that any of the tapas opened the shutters is ridiculous based on the evidences

[jassi]

Thank you for helping the less able out

Any suggestion that any of the tapas opened the shutters is ridiculous based on the evidences

What evidence would that be ?