Kate McCann: I believe kidnapper drugged my twins night Madeleine was taken.

[Robittybob1]

Any scenario that involved Madeleine dying in the apartment kills the idea of a kidnapper.
It could account for the cadaver odour in the bedroom.
It would not need opened windows and raised shutters, so the claim of staged scene could account for that.
There is a real problem with the logistics of getting rid of the body and hiding it. - still not impossible.
It would not require the twins to be sedated.  (Therefore no need to test them.)

No wonder Amaral went with this scenario.  Problem is whether Madeleine was alive and well when Gerry did his check.  But that observation is negated if Amaral really believes this scenario. 

Basic problem is that there is no proof, and Madeleine's body was not found, yet he turns that dilemma around by suggesting a frozen cadaver was in the rear of the Renault, but the DNA result did not confirm that.
But would the doctors do this to their daughter if it was the result of accidental death from a unknown cause?

[Mr Gray]

Simply give us your opinion on amarals book
You won't be able to answer because you will prove my point
And by not answering you prove my point
Donkey work done

You have asked for proof that you support amaral
You have not been able to give me an opinion on his book
Because if you did it would prove you support amaral
Simple

[Robittybob1]

You have asked for proof that you support amaral
You have not been able to give me an opinion on his book
Because if you did it would prove you support amaral
Simple

You have to admit Amaral's hypothesis was pretty good.

[Mr Gray]

You have to admit Amaral's hypothesis was pretty good.

To anyone who understands the evidence it was risible

[Robittybob1]

To anyone who understands the evidence it was risible

Well do you have a complete theory covering the first hour?  Just tell us what happened between 9:30 - 10:30 that night?  Do sedatives come into it?
It is poor practice to laugh at someone's hypothesis unless you have something to prove it wrong. Or do you have an alternative that can stand scrutiny?

[Alfie]

You have to admit Amaral's hypothesis was pretty good.

You'll be hard pressed to find a McCann-dunnit aficionado who thinks Amaral's hypothesis was "pretty good" these days.  It's got more holes than Swiss cheese.

[Robittybob1]

You'll be hard pressed to find a McCann-dunnit aficionado who thinks Amaral's hypothesis was "pretty good" these days.  It's got more holes than Swiss cheese.

Its not perfect.  Swiss cheese sounds good.

[Alfie]

Its not perfect.  Swiss cheese sounds good.

There is no such thing as a plausible, logical theory of parental involvement, FACT!

[Robittybob1]

There is no such thing as a plausible, logical theory of parental involvement, FACT!

Specifically in the McCann case, you are probably right.
That is why Amaral suggest it was an accidental death.

[G-Unit]

There is no such thing as a plausible, logical theory of parental involvement, FACT!

There is no such thing as a plausible, logical theory of abduction. FACT!

[Alfie]

There is no such thing as a plausible, logical theory of abduction. FACT!

Of course there is, don't be silly.

[Robittybob1]

Of course there is, don't be silly.

I've asked for a thread to discuss this.

[Alfie]

I've asked for a thread to discuss this.

It's all been done before http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7067.0

[G-Unit]

It's all been done before http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7067.0

It's been attempted several times, but I have seen no plausible logical theory of abduction.

[Alice Purjorick]

It's been attempted several times, but I have seen no plausible logical theory of abduction.

It customarily falls at the second (first?) fence; for predictable reasons!