Author Topic: MADELEINE'S DNA - definitive study.  (Read 77692 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: MADELEINE'S DNA - definitive study.
« Reply #210 on: January 25, 2017, 05:24:02 PM »
Rob, the word blood is absent from the whole of John Lowe's report.

Grime claims Keela could detect blood in traces so minute, they wouldn't trace it in a laboratory. 

How would Grime know?
Does he really say "laboratory" or what I remember "scene examination"?    Do you know the actual quote you were thinking of?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: MADELEINE'S DNA - definitive study.
« Reply #211 on: January 25, 2017, 05:31:24 PM »
However much is needed.
If, for the sake of argument, the laboratory can detect blood at a level of 5 parts per million, ( or whatever unit you might prefer), the task would be to see if a dog gave a positive response at level below thatm compared with known zero level.

I doubt very much the dog can detect such tiny amounts of blood in an aqueous solution......based on how the dog detects a scent

Offline jassi

Re: MADELEINE'S DNA - definitive study.
« Reply #212 on: January 25, 2017, 05:44:17 PM »
That, of course, is merely your dogmatic opinion.
The discussion was how one could test the claim, not what the actual  detection level might be.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: MADELEINE'S DNA - definitive study.
« Reply #213 on: January 25, 2017, 05:45:02 PM »
I doubt very much the dog can detect such tiny amounts of blood in an aqueous solution......based on how the dog detects a scent
So the reason they deploy dogs over reservoirs is ....... what?
What's up, old man?

Offline misty

Re: MADELEINE'S DNA - definitive study.
« Reply #214 on: January 25, 2017, 05:45:49 PM »
Keela only alerted to dried blood. How would an aqueous solution work?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: MADELEINE'S DNA - definitive study.
« Reply #215 on: January 25, 2017, 05:47:20 PM »
So the reason they deploy dogs over reservoirs is ....... what?

because they are looking for a great big dead body that is giving off tons and tons of scent....it really is as simple as that

Offline Mr Gray

Re: MADELEINE'S DNA - definitive study.
« Reply #216 on: January 25, 2017, 05:49:49 PM »
That, of course, is merely your dogmatic opinion.
The discussion was how one could test the claim, not what the actual  detection level might be.

based on an understanding of the principles of scent detection......judging by the responses i do seem to have a much better understanding than other posters. Have a think about how dogs detect scent and you might start to understand

Offline Mr Gray

Re: MADELEINE'S DNA - definitive study.
« Reply #217 on: January 25, 2017, 05:53:05 PM »
Keela only alerted to dried blood. How would an aqueous solution work?

I'm sure sil and jassi will explain it to you

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: MADELEINE'S DNA - definitive study.
« Reply #218 on: January 25, 2017, 05:57:58 PM »
Keela only alerted to dried blood. How would an aqueous solution work?
Perhaps your knowledge is better than mine.  But isn't there a video somewhere in which Grime makes a tiny pin-prick on his finger, stuffs a piece of bl**dy rag into a wall, and Keela alerts to it?

Roughly speaking, I am asking if the blood needs to be dried for Keela to alert.
What's up, old man?

Offline jassi

Re: MADELEINE'S DNA - definitive study.
« Reply #219 on: January 25, 2017, 05:59:19 PM »
So you could put a certain volume on a filter paper ( for example, or a cuddlecat) and allow it to dry.
I'm sure the forensic scientists conducting the tests would select the appropriate conditions for the test.
« Last Edit: January 25, 2017, 06:05:15 PM by jassi »
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: MADELEINE'S DNA - definitive study.
« Reply #220 on: January 25, 2017, 06:01:09 PM »
because they are looking for a great big dead body that is giving off tons and tons of scent....it really is as simple as that
A Madeleine-sized-body in a reservoir?  You are joking, I hope.
What's up, old man?

Offline jassi

Re: MADELEINE'S DNA - definitive study.
« Reply #221 on: January 25, 2017, 06:02:19 PM »
Keela only alerted to dried blood. How would an aqueous solution work?

You suggesting the dog would walk right passed a pool of  liquid blood?
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

Re: MADELEINE'S DNA - definitive study.
« Reply #222 on: January 25, 2017, 06:09:36 PM »
A Madeleine-sized-body in a reservoir?  You are joking, I hope.

compared to a few molesules of blood we are referring too a body the size of maddie would be giving off tons and tons of scent....you need to undestand how scent is detected

Offline Mr Gray

Re: MADELEINE'S DNA - definitive study.
« Reply #223 on: January 25, 2017, 06:11:27 PM »
You suggesting the dog would walk right passed a pool of  liquid blood?

a pool of liquid blood woiuld be giving off a lot of scent.....a very dilute solution may give off none

Offline Mr Gray

Re: MADELEINE'S DNA - definitive study.
« Reply #224 on: January 25, 2017, 06:17:48 PM »
So you could put a certain volume on a filter paper ( for example, or a cuddlecat) and allow it to dry.
I'm sure the forensic scientists conducting the tests would select the appropriate conditions for the test.

if the solution was so diliute it would be uncertain if you had any blood cells in your sample