Author Topic: Did Silvia Batista have a conflict of interest acting as an interpreter?  (Read 13256 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Did Silvia Batista have a conflict of interest acting as an interpreter?
« Reply #15 on: January 03, 2017, 02:12:59 AM »
As an aside, why was Joao Carlos pursuing issues about the photos in any event?
There has always been the issue as to whether the McCanns had pre-printed the posters and photos planning Madeleine's disappearance even before arriving.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline misty

Re: Did Silvia Batista have a conflict of interest acting as an interpreter?
« Reply #16 on: January 03, 2017, 02:14:21 AM »
A very controversial statement though.  I wouldn't say all on this forum would accept what Amy says in it is fact.
I think Silvia would have been controlling the dialogue.  It has never been explained how Bridget O'Donnell got the photo of Madeleine so soon.  Was this photo one of the ones produced by Amy Tierney?
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JEREMY_BRIGET.htm
*snipped*
They went to bed about 2300hrs but were waken about 0100hrs by a knock at the door. On answering the door they spoke with the resort manager and a person they knew was a member of the group but they only knew him as Matthew. It was then they found out that Madeleine was missing.

=====================================================================

If the photos were printed off just after 12 midnight then one could have been given to JW at 1am.

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Did Silvia Batista have a conflict of interest acting as an interpreter?
« Reply #17 on: January 03, 2017, 02:17:26 AM »
Donna Hill was spoken to & made some form of statement.

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/KIDS-CLUB-STAFF.htm

Officer responsible: Inspector Manuel Pinho

Description and Result:


On this date, in the company of my colleague L.Madeira, we spoke with Mrs Silvia Maria Correia Ramos B., director of maintenance and services for the company "GREENTROUST", which manages the "OCEAN CLUB" company, contactable by mobile phone 964....

Through her, we contacted Donna Louise Rafferty Hill (contactable by mobile phone number 964...) responsible for the crèche employees belonging to the "MARK WARNER" company, who were responsible for Madeleine and the twins for several periods during the day after their arrival in Portugal.

She told us that all these employees are English nationals and that they work in Portugal from
March/April until November; that there are 13 people who work in the crèche, their names and telephone numbers being as follows: [NOTE: Phone numbers withheld]
- Pauline Francis M.
- Emma Louise W.
- Sarah Elizabeth W.
- Susan Bernadette O.
- Leanne Danielle W.
- Shinead Maria V.
- Jacqueline Mary W.
- Kirsty Louise M.
- Lynne R.F.
- Catriona Treasa Sisile B.
- Stacey P.
- Lyndsay Jayne J.
- Amy Ellen T.

--- It was also determined that all these girls live outside the resort, although quite close to it, and that Catriona B. was responsible for Madeleine during the day yesterday.
--- Stacey P. was the staff member responsible for the McCann twins.
--- Usually, it is always the same nanny who cares for each child.
--- The latest to arrive in Portugal were Sarah W. and Charlotte Pennington who arrived last Saturday, April 28th 2007.
--- The witness is the one responsible for coordination, and who distributed the children between the various girls, allocating each child to one of them.
--- Nothing abnormal happened today and no one was absent from work except those who were on their day off.
--- All the carers have made themselves available to speak with the police.
Thank you.  I stand corrected.
What's up, old man?

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Did Silvia Batista have a conflict of interest acting as an interpreter?
« Reply #18 on: January 03, 2017, 02:29:56 AM »
Do you accept that she made the statements recorded in this article?  http://www.infobae.com/2007/08/15/331952-crecen-las-sospechas-contra-los-padres-madeleine/

In particular:
1. "The technical director of the Ocean Club resort, Silvia Batista, stated that the same night that Madeleine disappeared, she personally offered the childcare service "because the hotel is responsible for the children of the clients, but they Rejected ".

2. "According to the director of the housing, " every month have theft records in place, so a nanny service are advised " but even knowing this, Maddie's parents did not accept it "

3.  ""We did not have guilt in the disappearance of small, could not say who was at fault, but ours did not , " said the director, noting that "parents of that child night were very unconcerned" , reason They would not have asked for the babysitting service.

We might need a better translation of the 3rd quote as it doesn't quite make sense as it is.  Do you read Portuguese?

In 3 there are clear hints of a conflict of interest.  She is basically declaring that she and the OC are not guilty, like responsible  for Madeleine's disappearance. Then she goes on to say something like it wouldn't have happened had the parents not refused the babysitting service.
Is Silvia involved in providing the nanny service?  If she personally offered it earlier that day it sounds like she had some involvement in providing the service.

These issues are not raised in her statement yet seem very important to the case.  Why were they not raised with the PJ in her statement?

Here is another version of the statement 3 ""We did not bear the blame for the disappearance of the little girl, it couldn't be said whose fault it was, but certainly not ours", assured the director and indicated that "THE PARENTS OF THE GIRL THAT NIGHT WERE VERY UNCONCERNED", and there was no reason they should not have requested the service of a child-minder."

Here is an alternate version of statement 1. "In an exclusive interview with G1 on the afternoon of Tuesday (14), the director of technical services at the Ocean Club resort, Silvia Batista says that there was no fault of the hotel on the girl's disappearance. "The resort is not responsible for the children of clients. And we offer a babysitting service, which was not requested by the couple."
Which the opposite of ""because the hotel is responsible for the children of the clients, but they Rejected "
« Last Edit: January 03, 2017, 01:21:53 PM by ShiningInLuz »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Did Silvia Batista have a conflict of interest acting as an interpreter?
« Reply #19 on: January 03, 2017, 03:01:24 AM »
I still find this hard to believe "When she arrived at the resort, she went immediately to apartment 5A, where she met several persons both on the inside and on the outside of the apartment. She went into the apartment but left it right away without speaking to anyone, because she was informed that the GNR officers were at the main reception, so she went to meet them." http://themaddiecasefiles.com/post3855.html#p3855

Enter a potential crime scene, speak to no one and then leave.  That is weird. To feel that she is so needed, also weird!
« Last Edit: January 03, 2017, 06:07:56 AM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Did Silvia Batista have a conflict of interest acting as an interpreter?
« Reply #20 on: January 03, 2017, 07:20:50 AM »
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JEREMY_BRIGET.htm
*snipped*
They went to bed about 2300hrs but were waken about 0100hrs by a knock at the door. On answering the door they spoke with the resort manager and a person they knew was a member of the group but they only knew him as Matthew. It was then they found out that Madeleine was missing.

=====================================================================

If the photos were printed off just after 12 midnight then one could have been given to JW at 1am.
Who would have given the photo to JW - John Hill or Matt?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Did Silvia Batista have a conflict of interest acting as an interpreter?
« Reply #21 on: January 03, 2017, 10:33:39 AM »
How was Silvia able to get a statement like this accepted yet Kate couldn't get a drug test done on her twins, or even a mention that she was concerned!
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/SILVIA_BATISTA.htm
"Witness statement of Silvia Maria Correia Ramos Batista 2007.07.26
Date: 26 July 2007; Time: 16h00; Place: DIC Portimao
Officer: Paulo F., Inspector
To the matter at hand she said:
--- Already having given declarations in this case several times recalling the content of what she
had stated previously, reproducing [repeating] them all unchanged for this document.
--- The deponent appears again given that in the time since Madeleine disappeared she [S.B.] has
remembered some details of witnessed facts/events that she considers may, in some way, be of
interest to the investigation.
--- As already stated she was alerted to disappearance of Madeleine between 22h30 and 23h00.
She was at home and was informed of what happened by telephone. She went immediately to the
Ocean Club where she arrived a few minutes before the GNR officers arrived there. When she
arrived at the resort she went immediately to apartment 5A where she found several people as
much/many inside the apartment as outside it. Still she entered the apartment but left straight away
without having spoken with anyone who was there, since at the same time she was told that GNR
officers were at the main reception and she went to find them.
--- When she arrived at the officer's location she saw that behind them was Gerry, Madeleine's
father, with another person but she does not remember who it was. At that time Gerry was on the
ground on his knees, he hit the ground with both his hands, looking like an Arab at prayer, and
emitted two screams of rage [fury, madness] but she could not understand what he said. Then
Gerry stood up and accompanied the deponent and the other person to the GNR vehicle next to
the 5A apartment.
--- Once inside the apartment she asked those present for the passports of all members of their
families, as well as photographs of the missing girl. The deponent accompanied Gerry to the GNR
vehicle in order to deliver the requested documents. She states that she did this work, as well as
other work, at the request of the GNR Commander because they used her knowledge of English to
translate questions put to members of the family of the missing girl, as well as the answers that
were given. She recalls Gerry delivered several photographs of the missing girl to the GNR
Commander. The photos were postcard-style, they having that dimension and format. In truth they
were photographs of the dimension and format [size and shape] of a postcard, and they all looked
the same to her.
--- She was aware that from the first moment either Gerry or the others insisted in affirming that
Madeleine had been abducted always using the word "abducted" instead of disappeared, and all
showed great interest that the press were informed of the situation.
--- The deponent recalls further that she entered the bedroom where Madeleine had been
sleeping. Remembering it now that the door was closed. The interior of the room was dark. The
external blinds were down, light entering [the room] only through the holes in them. The windows
were shut and the curtains were slightly open. Gerry accompanied her on this visit, also with GNR
officers and he said that it had been him who had closed the window because the babies were still
sleeping there, which the deponent noticed to be true. Gerry stated that when he he was told about
Madeleine's disappearance he had found there the window and the blinds open, and the curtains
fluttering [as in the wind]. The deponent recalls that there were beds in the middle of the room and
that those being used by the babies were aligned [with each other] and therefore she thought it
strange that someone had taken Madeleine from the bed where she had been sleeping as far as to
the window because from that layout [of the beds] there had been no space to get past. The
deponent opened the wardrobes in the bedroom in order to check if possibly Madeleine wasn't
hidden in there. Then everyone left the bedroom someone having returned to close the door. The
deponent then spent some time in the room [lounge], with the GNR officers, Gerry and other
members of the group there who were in a large whirl, who came in, left and spoke on the mobile
phone. She noticed that none of the group, including the child's parents, were occupied with the
search. The mother was seated on the bed in the couple's bedroom, the father accompanied her
and the police officers and the other members of the group entered, left and spoke on the phone,
appearing to her to be preoccupied with informing the press about what had happened.
--- She thought that the child's mother was dejected [downcast; depressed; discouraged], the
father was preoccupied [worried] and also asked whether the media had been advised or the
search dogs had been arranged [organised]. Of the others she only recalls that Fiona and her
husband, Payne, were hysterical with the situation. At a given point, soon after the PJ officers
arrived, the parents took the twins from their beds where they were sleeping, taking them up to the
apartment on the first floor. At Kate's request the deponent took from the babies' cots the dolls and
a blanket also up to the first floor. The cots stayed with only the mattresses [in them].
--- The deponent wanted also to state that around 03h00 Madeleine's parents asked [about] the
presence of a priest in the area. They didn't explain their reason for wanting a priest but the
deponent found it strange since there was no indication that the child was dead and it is usual only
in those circumstances that one would ask for a priest.
--- At a certain point the deponent translated a statement from one of the ladies of the English
group, the lady she indicated as being dark-skinned. This lady said to the police officers, and the
deponent translated, that she had seen a man walking [passing] in the street, possibly with a child
in his arms. The deponent thought this strange because she was convinced that when she had
seen the man the lady was positioned in an area that had no line of sight to the area where she
would have seen the man. She doesn't know exactly where the lady was positioned when she saw
the man pass, but she knows that she indicated having seen him passing in the road that was in
front of the bedroom window where Madeleine had been, walking in the direction of the road of the
road that then goes to the Baptista supermarket.
--- Questioned as to the clothing the members of the English group had worn that night she states
that she only recalls that Fiona wore a green blouse, that Gerry wore a dark shirt and that Fiona's
husband wore plain trousers, cream, she thinks.
Nothing more said. Read, ratifies and is going to sign."
« Last Edit: January 03, 2017, 10:37:00 AM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Did Silvia Batista have a conflict of interest acting as an interpreter?
« Reply #22 on: January 03, 2017, 03:55:32 PM »
Inside knowledge.  Look at it this way, the parents of the missing child weren't going to question the resort security when a manager was interpreting their every word.

Why would they question the resort security anyway when the child was not strictly in the OC resort nor under their care when she disappeared?. Had the child been in the care of OC then there would have been a conflict of interest. OC ceased to have responsiblity when the parents signed her out.
I note that K McCann's statement of 4-5-2007 to the police was not translated by Sra Batista.
If carried to its logical conclusion some of the arguments put forward suggestig conflicts of interest could only be satisfied by bussing in full time interpreters who had no connections with Luz from about 20 klicks away. I don't see that happening.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Did Silvia Batista have a conflict of interest acting as an interpreter?
« Reply #23 on: January 03, 2017, 05:12:55 PM »
Why would they question the resort security anyway when the child was not strictly in the OC resort nor under their care when she disappeared?. Had the child been in the care of OC then there would have been a conflict of interest. OC ceased to have responsibility when the parents signed her out.
I note that K McCann's statement of 4-5-2007 to the police was not translated by Sra Batista.
If carried to its logical conclusion some of the arguments put forward suggesting conflicts of interest could only be satisfied by bussing in full time interpreters who had no connections with Luz from about 20 klicks away. I don't see that happening.
Alice did you read http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7864.msg373004#msg373004 ? I left a question for you in that post.  In this Portuguese press release the translations back to English give us varying description of OC responsibilities to the children.  What is your translation of it?

You say "If carried to its logical conclusion some of the arguments put forward suggesting conflicts of interest could only be satisfied by bussing in full time interpreters who had no connections with Luz from about 20 klicks away. I don't see that happening."  Well that appears to be what OC did to make sure an interpreter was on hand.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Did Silvia Batista have a conflict of interest acting as an interpreter?
« Reply #24 on: January 03, 2017, 10:07:18 PM »
Alice did you read http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7864.msg373004#msg373004 ? I left a question for you in that post.  In this Portuguese press release the translations back to English give us varying description of OC responsibilities to the children.  What is your translation of it?

You say "If carried to its logical conclusion some of the arguments put forward suggesting conflicts of interest could only be satisfied by bussing in full time interpreters who had no connections with Luz from about 20 klicks away. I don't see that happening."  Well that appears to be what OC did to make sure an interpreter was on hand.

I would start from first principles and not in the middle.
Potentially there are 6 parties involved with potentially a total of 13 contracts between them one way or another.
I would attempt to unravel that lot before going off half cocked.
Conflicts of interest are rarely illegal. It is doubtful any conflict of interest that existed in the circumstances under discussion here would be illegal. The issue then is: is there a conflict of interest contrary to contract where
it is possible to act on the conflict in such manner that causes harm to a party to whom you have a duty under the contract, or you fail to disclose or take steps to mitigate the conflict. When considering this you may have trouble with proving there was no disclosure or mitigation.


"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Did Silvia Batista have a conflict of interest acting as an interpreter?
« Reply #25 on: January 03, 2017, 10:55:25 PM »
I would start from first principles and not in the middle.
Potentially there are 6 parties involved with potentially a total of 13 contracts between them one way or another.
I would attempt to unravel that lot before going off half cocked.
Conflicts of interest are rarely illegal. It is doubtful any conflict of interest that existed in the circumstances under discussion here would be illegal. The issue then is: is there a conflict of interest contrary to contract where
it is possible to act on the conflict in such manner that causes harm to a party to whom you have a duty under the contract, or you fail to disclose or take steps to mitigate the conflict. When considering this you may have trouble with proving there was no disclosure or mitigation.
Well with Kate we do have a statement of disclosure, and that was that Kate found out later that Silvia was the OC manager of Maintenance and services.  She didn't disclose this to begin with.  Do the first two GNR officers speak of her role with the Ocean Club?
Jose Roque "When they arrived, they saw the girl's father, a friend whom he cannot describe, an OC employee and a translator who was also an OC employee, named Silvia Batista."  No managerial role defined.
Da Costa - Silvia not mentioned.
Antonio Henrique de Conceicao Duarte does mention her role but the statement is long after the McCanns were made arguidos.
Antonio Henrique da Duarte Conceicao - "He was told that (Roque) had already gone to main reception of the complex in Rua Direita and had met the father of the little girl who had appeared in the reception with a friend. Together with employee Silvia (service manager of the OC and who also acted as translator, the father (Gerald McCann) and the friend they went inside the apartment from which Madeleine McCann had disappeared. After Roque checked that the child was not in the apartment, he gathered information from the mother and father. He was told by the patrol, that the father had put forward a theory saying that it could have been an abduction. He was also told that there was a shutter that had been 'raised'. "
There doesn't seem to be the right number of brackets. but "(service manager of the OC) seems an after thought.

"At the scene, he talked directly to the patrol and to Silvia who informed him about what had been said. His hope was that the child had left the apartment alone and got lost or that someone had seen her and stayed with her temporarily."
It is a bit ambiguous as to who it is who says this. Was this from Gerry talking to Silvia or Duarte's own thoughts.

Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Did Silvia Batista have a conflict of interest acting as an interpreter?
« Reply #26 on: January 03, 2017, 11:09:56 PM »
Instead of concerning ourselves whether an actual conflict of interest occurred the GNR should have considered whether there is the potential for a conflict of interest to occur.

With Joao saying his wife was called in specifically to act as an interpreter, an instruction delivered to her by the Manager or owner of the OC business, that in itself is suggesting a more serious conflict of interest even higher up the scale than just Silvia acting on her own.
Silvia blames Robin Crosland but it appears that is unlikely when you cross check the related statements. 
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7824.msg373022#msg373022  for an analysis of who could have contacted Silvia.
« Last Edit: January 03, 2017, 11:26:15 PM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Did Silvia Batista have a conflict of interest acting as an interpreter?
« Reply #27 on: January 03, 2017, 11:39:11 PM »
It is in her third statement where she influences the course of the investigation that shows she is being more than an interpreter.  Why does she appear to point the finger at Robert Murat in her second statement?  (Suggestive messages only always allowing herself an out.)
Why does she criticise Jane's testimony without doing an actual check that she has her facts straight?
Why does she suggest the parents were not being genuine in their distress?
Probably many more points too but these are from my recall. 

And then to think she may not have transmitted Kate's concern about the twins being sedated to the GNR or the PJ on Kate's behalf.  Why?  What could be going on that would make her say these things?
And then to give an interview where she claims to have personally offered a babysitting service to Kate that very day.  Isn't that confirming the conflict of interest, she has a personal issue that involves the lost child.  Saying basically "if only Kate or Gerry had listened to me, this may not have happened".  I wonder who it was she spoke to, was it to Kate or Gerry?
« Last Edit: January 04, 2017, 02:22:29 AM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Did Silvia Batista have a conflict of interest acting as an interpreter?
« Reply #28 on: January 04, 2017, 06:00:40 AM »
Can I suggest you get basic facts correct?

From Silvia's statement "until the present date, as a head of maintenance and services.
 The head of maintenance and services, in the area of services, is responsible for the admission of employees and, in the area of maintenance, is responsible for the admission of employees and the good functioning of all equipment of the Ocean Club, including : flats, swimming pools, gardens, fences, etc."

This has nothing to do with childcare, so your starting premise appears to be fatally flawed.
.....
This web entry was supported by a link which has subsequently disappeared.
http://3as.madeleinemccann.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=14070&sid=7c0d0c8ed6dd8ecedb83682290d29550#p380929
"Como funciona esse serviço no resort?
Resp:O h├│spede deve pedir pelo telefone e as garotas (meninas inglesas) v├úo at├® o quarto para cuidar das crian├ºas. ├ë gratuito e est├í inclu├¡do no pacote de f├®rias, assim como as recrea├º├Áes diurnas. Mas os McCann n├úo pediram esse servi├ºo.

How does this service (babysitting) work in the resort?
Answer (Sylvia Batista): The guest has to make the request by phone and the babysitters (English girls) go to the room to look after the children. This is free and is included in the holiday package, as is the daily recreation. But the McCanns did not request this service."
So from that it appears the one of the services is "babysitting".  It would make sense since SB says she offered this to the McCanns.  What I find odd from her response is that the service for on site babysitters is "free" for I have seen it previously quoted at 15 Euro per hour.  What is the truth about the cost of the babysitting service?

This quote was posted on this forum some years back http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=6341.35;wap2

This service is mentioned in the Summary http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/LEGAL_SUMMARY.htm  "at an additional cost, apart from another babysitting service with no defined schedule"  That doesn't flow right for me to understand that.  I think we'd call that "cash under the table", is that what they mean?

https://www.oceanclubresorts.com/cms/images/babysitting_services.pdf It may have been different in Portugal in 2007
From someone who went to Algarve http://blogs.thisismoney.co.uk/2007/05/my_experience_o.html "The McCanns’ choice to leave their children at the flat and make regular checks is surprising given the alternatives. In their defence, they may have been expecting, as advertised in Mark Warner brochures, a ‘listening service’. Staff told us that the service had been discontinued because the apartments were too spread out. The resort, however, offered a baby-sitting service for 15 euros (£10) an hour, which was staffed by a member of the daytime nursery teams, or a ‘dining out club’. This involved parents dropping off children at the crèche where they would be supervised watching videos until they went to sleep. Parents would then return before 11.30 to scoop up their sleepy offspring.

I can imagine the McCanns’ dilemma. The ‘dining out club’ was more than a five-minute walk from where the McCanns stayed along cobbled streets or a winding pedestrian path through the apartments. It’s not far - it worked brilliantly for us on most nights - but it would have felt much further if you had to ferry thee children there and back (and hope they were still asleep after doing so). Plus parents were required to wait until children under two, which includes the McCanns’ twins, were asleep. We talked to parents who said this was enough to put them off the option."

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/LYNSAY-JAYNE.htm
". For an additional fee, parents can obtain a "babysitting" service without a fixed time, to be arranged between the parents and the baby-sitter."
So it definitely wasn't free.

From Stacey Portz   http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/STACY-POTZ.htm
"--- Further still is the "Babysitting" service between 19h30 and 01h00 carried out in the apartments of the persons using it."  So it went right through to 1:00 AM. 
« Last Edit: January 04, 2017, 03:56:40 PM by ShiningInLuz »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Did Silvia Batista have a conflict of interest acting as an interpreter?
« Reply #29 on: January 04, 2017, 01:45:57 PM »
Were I you I would stop wasting my time and potentially getting RSI until I had sorted out who was contracted to do what and what all the contractual relationships were.
Until you know that you are guessing wildly.
I'll join in again when you have posted copies of all the contracts.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey