Author Topic: Have the dog alerts any significance?  (Read 100675 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Have the dog alerts any significance?
« Reply #885 on: February 08, 2017, 10:32:53 AM »
Would it have been just as funny if they had found nothing?
The reason for the hilarity was that the drama writers gave a dead mouse as the reason for the dog alerting to the scent of death.  I've no idea if this actually happened in real life or not but my mirth was caused by the outrage response I imagined in the homes of numerous cadaver dog fans up and down the country.  @)(++(*

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Have the dog alerts any significance?
« Reply #886 on: February 08, 2017, 06:13:57 PM »
The reason for the hilarity was that the drama writers gave a dead mouse as the reason for the dog alerting to the scent of death.  I've no idea if this actually happened in real life or not but my mirth was caused by the outrage response I imagined in the homes of numerous cadaver dog fans up and down the country.  @)(++(*
I know it could sound funny, but finding a dead mouse would be a common event around my house and many other houses that have cats.  Did the dog alert to that mouse or was that just an incidental finding?
« Last Edit: February 08, 2017, 08:26:07 PM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Have the dog alerts any significance?
« Reply #887 on: February 08, 2017, 06:30:31 PM »
I know it could sound funny, but finding a dead mouse would be a common even around my house and may other houses that have cats.  Did the dog alert to that mouse or was that just an incidental finding?

Possibly poetic licence to add some humour.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Have the dog alerts any significance?
« Reply #888 on: February 08, 2017, 08:27:37 PM »
Possibly poetic licence to add some humour.
Any limrick or ditto will do to make the dogs look incompetent.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline jassi

Re: Have the dog alerts any significance?
« Reply #889 on: February 08, 2017, 08:29:27 PM »
Any limrick or ditto will do to make the dogs look incompetent.

Why would you want to make the dogs look incompetent?  Do they worry you ? If so you must be a sheep.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Have the dog alerts any significance?
« Reply #890 on: February 08, 2017, 08:31:22 PM »
Why would you want to make the dogs look incompetent?  Do they worry you ? If so you must be a sheep.
I was defending man's best friend from all the sheeple.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline rotti

Re: Have the dog alerts any significance?
« Reply #891 on: February 11, 2017, 11:45:25 AM »
in an interview on you tube jerry says' it was we who asked for the dogs to be bought in'.why if you asked for them do you than say in an interview that 'the dogs are unreliable'.i would like to ask jerry or anyone on the planet 'would you board a aeroplane where a sniffer dog has indicated explosives'.how many have raised they hands.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Have the dog alerts any significance?
« Reply #892 on: February 11, 2017, 11:49:54 AM »
in an interview on you tube jerry says' it was we who asked for the dogs to be bought in'.why if you asked for them do you than say in an interview that 'the dogs are unreliable'.i would like to ask jerry or anyone on the planet 'would you board a aeroplane where a sniffer dog has indicated explosives'.how many have raised they hands.
not that old chesnut!  Do you think a dog aerting on a plane means the plane definitely has explosives on board so they just explode the plane at a safe distance on the runway?  Or do they search the plane and if they find nothing, let passengers on board to continue with their journey?  A dog alert does not confirm anything and needs to be backed ip with evidence.  Take a look at the statistics of the number of false alerts on drug and explosives dogs, they are there to be found by googling.

Offline rotti

Re: Have the dog alerts any significance?
« Reply #893 on: February 11, 2017, 12:01:59 PM »
not that old chesnut!  Do you think a dog aerting on a plane means the plane definitely has explosives on board so they just explode the plane at a safe distance on the runway?  Or do they search the plane and if they find nothing, let passengers on board to continue with their journey?  A dog alert does not confirm anything and needs to be backed ip with evidence.  Take a look at the statistics of the number of false alerts on drug and explosives dogs, they are there to be found by googling.
fair enough thats your opinion ,but i didnt mention a search you did .so without a search you would board that flight.yes or no.if dogs are so unreliable why are they used by hundreds of police forces.why call for them and ignore their findings.maybe you should google.mcspin 'cadaver dogs unreliable' and watch the video on youtube very interesting.also puts paid to the mccans inlaws about the meat they carried in the boot of the hire car &%+((£
« Last Edit: February 11, 2017, 12:11:09 PM by rotti »

Offline Benice

Re: Have the dog alerts any significance?
« Reply #894 on: February 11, 2017, 12:17:57 PM »
in an interview on you tube jerry says' it was we who asked for the dogs to be bought in'.why if you asked for them do you than say in an interview that 'the dogs are unreliable'.i would like to ask jerry or anyone on the planet 'would you board a aeroplane where a sniffer dog has indicated explosives'.how many have raised they hands.

I wouldn't be refusing to board because I KNEW explosives were on board, it would be because explosives MIGHT be on board.   The dogs are not infallible.

There are many examples of dogs alerting for drugs at airports where the person alerted to has no drugs on them, but may have recently been in close contact with someone who has.    That situation would and does cause alerts to completely innocent people.

IOW - this is not the exact science some people would like to think it is.   Far from it.

The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Have the dog alerts any significance?
« Reply #895 on: February 11, 2017, 02:32:25 PM »
I wouldn't be refusing to board because I KNEW explosives were on board, it would be because explosives MIGHT be on board.   The dogs are not infallible.

There are many examples of dogs alerting for drugs at airports where the person alerted to has no drugs on them, but may have recently been in close contact with someone who has.    That situation would and does cause alerts to completely innocent people.

IOW - this is not the exact science some people would like to think it is.   Far from it.

Yet dogs are used worldwide, by a variety of services, police or otherwise.

Obviously they are totally useless. &%&£(+ &%&£(+ &%&£(+

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Have the dog alerts any significance?
« Reply #896 on: February 11, 2017, 02:56:59 PM »
fair enough thats your opinion ,but i didnt mention a search you did .so without a search you would board that flight.yes or no.if dogs are so unreliable why are they used by hundreds of police forces.why call for them and ignore their findings.maybe you should google.mcspin 'cadaver dogs unreliable' and watch the video on youtube very interesting.also puts paid to the mccans inlaws about the meat they carried in the boot of the hire car &%+((£

Alfie does not do "yes" or "no". It's not part of his MO.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Have the dog alerts any significance?
« Reply #897 on: February 11, 2017, 04:16:41 PM »
Please do not invite members to post libel.  I'm simply going to have to delete each request and each response.
What's up, old man?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Have the dog alerts any significance?
« Reply #898 on: February 11, 2017, 04:21:40 PM »
fair enough thats your opinion ,but i didnt mention a search you did .so without a search you would board that flight.yes or no.if dogs are so unreliable why are they used by hundreds of police forces.why call for them and ignore their findings.maybe you should google.mcspin 'cadaver dogs unreliable' and watch the video on youtube very interesting.also puts paid to the mccans inlaws about the meat they carried in the boot of the hire car &%+((£

The dogs are used worldwide to find evidence
That is their value
In this case they found none
Grime never said they had a 100% record
It is impossible to say what their success rate is....fact

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Have the dog alerts any significance?
« Reply #899 on: February 12, 2017, 05:12:22 AM »
SC ruling mentioned the dogs

Page 19:
"2 – Fundamental principles

1.2. In the appealed acórdão the following facts are considered proved :
.....
"6. The dogs Eddie and Keela, from the British police, have detected human blood and cadaver scent in the apartment 5A of the Ocean Club (al.AR).

7. The dogs Eddie and Keela, from the British police, have detected human blood and cadaver scent in the vehicle rented by the applicants KMC and GMC after Madeleine's disappearance (al.AS)."

Page 56: 
"Before, however, the relevant facts to be taken into account in deciding the question referred to above shall be listed below :

5. The claimant Madeleine McCann has been missing since 3/5/2007, and the criminal investigation has not been carried out by the Office of the Prosecutor of the Republic of the region of Portimão.

6. The dogs of the British police 'Eddie and Keela' have detected human blood and body odours in the Ocean Club apartment 5-A.

7. The dogs Eddie and Keela, from the British police, have detected human blood and cadaver scent in the vehicle rented by the applicants KMC and GMC after Madeleine's disappearance."

I'm not sure what the question is being referred to, but they take the uncorroborated dog alerts to be some sort of evidence, well they call it a fact, which it is but what do they make from that fact?

Maybe they use it to confirm "Chief Inspector Tavares de Almeida wrote a report and in particular the following : Given what we could establish, the facts point towards the death of Madeleine McCann during the evening of 3 May 2007, in the apartment 5A of Praia da Luz Ocean Club resort, occupied by the McCann couple and their three children."
So it is Tavares that makes the initial error of converting the dog alerts into evidence.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.