« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 95 96 [97] 98 99 ... 143   Go Down

Author Topic: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.  (Read 253481 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1440 on: February 10, 2017, 10:27:38 AM »
Quote from: G-Unit on February 10, 2017, 07:50:27 AM
Isabel Duarte seemed to believe the archiving dispatch cleared them. She has been corrected by the judges of the Supreme Court.

There was misunderstanding of the archive dispatch before she got involved, however, this news report seems to equate clearing of the arguido status with clearing of involvement;

Madeleine McCann: Kate and Gerry cleared of 'arguido' status by Portuguese police
The parents of Madeleine McCann have been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance,
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/2439530/Madeleine-McCann-Kate-and-Gerry-cleared-of-arguido-status-by-Portuguese-police.html

That was interesting for then it was stated there was no evidence against the McCanns, not insufficent evidence but none. 
"Fourteen months after she disappeared, Portugal's attorney-general, Fernando Jose Pinto Monteiro, said the police had found no evidence linking the McCanns, or fellow suspect Robert Murat, to Madeleine's suspected abduction.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/2439530/Madeleine-McCann-Kate-and-Gerry-cleared-of-arguido-status-by-Portuguese-police.html
"The case involving Madeleine McCann will be shelved following the decision by the two magistrates in charge that no evidence was found to implicate the arguidos," his statement read."

So wouldn't that suggest they were innocent?
« Last Edit: February 10, 2017, 10:34:10 AM by Robittybob1 »
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1441 on: February 10, 2017, 10:30:36 AM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on February 10, 2017, 10:27:38 AM
That was interesting for then it was stated there was no evidence against the McCanns, not insufficent evidence but none. 
"Fourteen months after she disappeared, Portugal's attorney-general, Fernando Jose Pinto Monteiro, said the police had found no evidence linking the McCanns, or fellow suspect Robert Murat, to Madeleine's suspected abduction.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/2439530/Madeleine-McCann-Kate-and-Gerry-cleared-of-arguido-status-by-Portuguese-police.html
"The case involving Madeleine McCann will be shelved following the decision by the two magistrates in charge that no evidence was found to implicate the arguidos," his statement read."

The law has been dealt with in the Supreme Court JUDGEMENT.

Get over it.

They can't appeal in Portugal
Logged

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1442 on: February 10, 2017, 10:35:25 AM »
Quote from: stephen25000 on February 10, 2017, 10:30:36 AM
The law has been dealt with in the Supreme Court JUDGEMENT.

Get over it.

They can't appeal in Portugal
just wait and see what happens.
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline xtina

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1443 on: February 10, 2017, 10:36:00 AM »
Quote from: davel on February 10, 2017, 10:27:21 AM
Nothing has changed
The McCanns have never and will never be charged with anything because they are innocent and anyone who thinks otherwise is deluded imo


not as deluded ...as anyone who thinks they can go to the.......... ECHR


it does show though they care more for there reputation .than anything else ....

and spent a fortune .trying to protect it ......
Logged
Always listen to both sides of the story before you judge.

The first storyteller you will always find has modified the story, for there benefit BE WISE.

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1444 on: February 10, 2017, 10:37:28 AM »
Quote from: xtina on February 10, 2017, 10:36:00 AM

not as deluded ...as anyone who thinks they can go to the.......... ECHR


it does show though they care more for there reputation .than anything else ....

and spent a fortune .trying to protect it ......

wouldnt the   ECHR  respect  portugals  findings??
Logged

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1445 on: February 10, 2017, 10:39:30 AM »
Quote from: xtina on February 10, 2017, 10:36:00 AM

not as deluded ...as anyone who thinks they can go to the.......... ECHR


it does show though they care more for there reputation .than anything else ....

and spent a fortune .trying to protect it ......
And why not, they are doctors.
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline xtina

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1446 on: February 10, 2017, 10:43:10 AM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on February 10, 2017, 10:39:30 AM
And why not, they are doctors.

well they can't cure themselves on this ...............
Logged
Always listen to both sides of the story before you judge.

The first storyteller you will always find has modified the story, for there benefit BE WISE.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1447 on: February 10, 2017, 10:44:22 AM »
Quote from: xtina on February 10, 2017, 10:43:10 AM
well they can't cure themselves on this ...............
The patient hasn't died yet.
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1448 on: February 10, 2017, 10:45:52 AM »
Quote from: xtina on February 10, 2017, 10:36:00 AM

not as deluded ...as anyone who thinks they can go to the.......... ECHR


it does show though they care more for there reputation .than anything else ....

and spent a fortune .trying to protect it ......

they can go to the ECHR........
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1449 on: February 10, 2017, 10:47:32 AM »
Quote from: carlymichelle on February 10, 2017, 10:37:28 AM
wouldnt the   ECHR  respect  portugals  findings??

LOL
Logged

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1450 on: February 10, 2017, 10:47:41 AM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on February 10, 2017, 10:35:25 AM
just wait and see what happens.

There is nothing to happen in Portugal.

Case closed, bar the ECHR, and I wouldn't recommend that.

Logged

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1451 on: February 10, 2017, 10:48:30 AM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on February 10, 2017, 10:39:30 AM
And why not, they are doctors.

What has being Doctors got to do with it ?
Logged

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1452 on: February 10, 2017, 10:49:37 AM »
Quote from: stephen25000 on February 10, 2017, 10:30:36 AM
The law has been dealt with in the Supreme Court JUDGEMENT.

Get over it.

They can't appeal in Portugal
Steohen, would you kindly stop telling McCann supporters to "get over it", it's as annoying and provocative as Brexiteers and Trump supporters saying the same thing to their opposite number.  Just because we're on the "losing" side doesn't mean we have to shut up and accept the judgement, surely you can understand that?
Logged

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1453 on: February 10, 2017, 10:51:09 AM »
Quote from: stephen25000 on February 10, 2017, 10:48:30 AM
What has being Doctors got to do with it ?
A doctor depends on his her reputation.  They aren't gangsters where a bad reputation might be some advantage.
« Last Edit: February 10, 2017, 10:53:07 AM by ShiningInLuz »
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1454 on: February 10, 2017, 10:52:19 AM »
Quote from: stephen25000 on February 10, 2017, 10:48:30 AM
What has being Doctors got to do with it ?

its a class war with  mcann supporters always has been   here in australia doctors  have no more standing then normal  people they go to work  and go home they are not above anyone else
« Last Edit: February 10, 2017, 10:54:33 AM by carlymichelle »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 95 96 [97] 98 99 ... 143   Go Up
« previous next »