Author Topic: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.  (Read 253450 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Montclair

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2055 on: February 24, 2017, 07:53:47 PM »
every high profile case takes place in a media scrum....the pj just were not up to the job. No excuse for the poor collection of forensics and teh inability to understand the results of what forensic tests were undertaken.

as for frivolous....dont believe everything you read in teh papers

Isabel Duarte did use the word "leviano" which can be translated as frivolous, hasty, irresponsible, etc.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2056 on: February 24, 2017, 07:59:31 PM »
Isabel Duarte did use the word "leviano" which can be translated as frivolous, hasty, irresponsible, etc.


so she may well have meant hasty....thanks very much
what it does show is what an inexact science translation is.....plenty of room for error in the twice translated non verbatim statements

Offline jassi

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2057 on: February 24, 2017, 08:02:52 PM »

so she may well have meant hasty....thanks very much
what it does show is what an inexact science translation is.....plenty of room for error in the twice translated non verbatim statements

Or irresponsible - don't forget that option  8(>((
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2058 on: February 24, 2017, 08:03:14 PM »
Just like the PJ and GNR should have been able to get on with their job in the June 2014 Luz dig without worrying about the media?

OK - no need to cordon the 3 dig areas off.  No need to issue warnings about media interference.  No need to man umpty positions in Luz 24x10 for that farrago.  They should have stepped back and let the media get on with it.  Are you of the opinion that was appropriate for 4 May 2007?

I must look up the Portuguese word for tripe.  I wonder if the alleged butcher in Portelas sells tripe.  I say alleged because we have been told it is the best butcher in the region and I can lay my hands on all sorts of rare meat.  Whilst A N Other reckons there is no butcher in Portelas and I am going to have to visit Odiáxere for my delicacies.

You seem to have a problem with the media....its absolutely natural for the media to want to report on something so newsworthy as maddies disappearance

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2059 on: February 24, 2017, 08:04:38 PM »
Or irresponsible - don't forget that option  8(>((

thtas the whole point...we dont know what she meant and its guaranteed theres just such misundersatndings in the translated statements

Offline jassi

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2060 on: February 24, 2017, 08:09:13 PM »
No sure hasty is appropriate. From what I've read, they only had 10 days  in which to make the application.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Brietta

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2061 on: February 24, 2017, 08:09:18 PM »
You seem to have a problem with the media....its absolutely natural for the media to want to report on something so newsworthy as maddies disappearance

It is normal practice when a child goes missing to seek publicity and the sooner the better.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2062 on: February 24, 2017, 08:13:03 PM »
It is normal practice when a child goes missing to seek publicity and the sooner the better.

of course its normal practice

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2063 on: February 24, 2017, 08:23:40 PM »
It is normal practice when a child goes missing to seek publicity and the sooner the better.

Not in possible kidnapping cases.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Brietta

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2064 on: February 24, 2017, 08:35:23 PM »
Not in possible kidnapping cases.

                        ???
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline slartibartfast

“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.


Offline slartibartfast

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2067 on: February 24, 2017, 09:08:45 PM »
there is a diference between kidnapping and child abduction

Must be so easy to spot when your child goes missing...
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2068 on: February 24, 2017, 09:13:34 PM »
Must be so easy to spot when your child goes missing...

very easy to spot...ill leave you to work out the diference


Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2069 on: February 24, 2017, 09:21:04 PM »
very easy to spot...ill leave you to work out the diference

You tell us.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey