Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.

[Robittybob1]

The Metodo affair

I've never really studied that as yet, sorry I can't comment.

[Mr Gray]

A small group getting smaller by the day.

It's a rather stupid idea to suggest posters are emotionally involved and I'm surprised you are doing it
Can't you understand it is a fascinating case
The Portuguese have given their verdict and thats that
It will be interesting to see what happens now

[Angelo222]

It's a rather stupid idea to suggest posters are emotionally involved and I'm surprised you are doing it
Can't you understand it is a fascinating case
The Portuguese have given their verdict and thats that
It will be interesting to see what happens now

Its Amaral's turn now to turn up the heat.

[Mr Gray]

Its the same everywhere, Portugal is no different.

Portugal is different
The police have far too much power
I have never seen someone looking like cipriano appear in court on the UK
The PJ knew they could get away with it and they did

[Mr Gray]

Its Amaral's turn now to turn up the heat.

We will see
I think you may be wrong

[carlymichelle]

We will see
I think you may be wrong

rather you  hope he is  wrong??  GA   could  sue you and any other mcann supoorters if he  wanted too nothing is stopping  him

[Alfie]

So tell me Rob, what about their activities after the event.  Do you agree that this should be investigated?

Angelo, may I ask why you think the McCanns should be investigated when you appear to be convinced that Madeleine was abducted after she woke and wandered?

[Alfie]

Its Amaral's turn now to turn up the heat.

but unlike the McCanns he's not a vengeful, arrogant, greedy, foolhardy bloke is he?

[Mr Gray]

Angelo, may I ask why you think the McCanns should be investigated when you appear to be convinced that Madeleine was abducted after she woke and wandered?

The McCanns have been investigated
It's time for their critics to move on
10 years almost and they are still posting the same rubbish

[Mr Gray]

Strange not a word from amaral

[faithlilly]

but unlike the McCanns he's not a vengeful, arrogant, greedy, foolhardy bloke is he?

For once we agree. I think he'll be more than pleased just to have his reputation, money but most of all his life back.

[stephen25000]

Strange not a word from amaral

Haven't you realized yet, we are waiting for the full breakdown of Tuesday's decision.

[carlymichelle]

Haven't you realized yet, we are waiting for the full breakdown of Tuesday's decision.

he doesnt have to anwer to  mcann supporters  either   does he

[Benice]

rather you  hope he is  wrong??  GA   could  sue you and any other mcann supoorters if he  wanted too nothing is stopping  him

So what in your opinion can he sue McCann supporters for?   

He has been 'accused' of:-

1.  Having a criminal conviction.         
2.  Being an adulterer.                         
3.  Defrauding his own brother             
4.  Making untrue statements in his book and telling lies in interviews.
5.  Breaking his own country's secrecy laws by covertly talking to the press.

As all of the above is on record as being the case -   what are the grounds on which you are so sure he can sue McCann supporters?

IMO the only people he can possibly sue are his own supporters who made his book available for free worldwide on the internet without his permission, thus depriving him of profit.

             

[stephen25000]

So what in your opinion can he sue McCann supporters for?   

He has been 'accused' of:-

1.  Having a criminal conviction.         
2.  Being an adulterer.                         
3.  Defrauding his own brother             
4.  Making untrue statements in his book and telling lies in interviews.
5.  Breaking his own country's secrecy laws by covertly talking to the press.

As all of the above is on record as being the case -   what are the grounds on which you are so sure he can sue McCann supporters?

IMO the only people he can possibly sue are his own supporters who made his book available for free worldwide on the internet without his permission, thus depriving him of profit.

           

Well I've seen some desperate attempts in my time to divert attention, but what do any of these have to do with this case ?

By the way, do you seriously believe that only one person might have broken Portugal's secrecy laws.

What about the sources close to the Mccann's ?   &%+((£