Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.

[Mr Gray]

You think British coppers are perfect little angels then?

Nothing like the torture that has been documented by amnesty by the police in Portugal

[Benice]

stuff like he  drove  around   portugal with his little girl  drunk etc which is hersay claims that he killed his own dog  etc   calling him names like  A   M  O R   A  L  etc    claming he  was a bungling  cop  etc loads of other  stuff  defaming him  with stuff like he  was a    fat cop who dared to have  dinner     the  night maddie vanished etc    petty stufff imo

Is that it?   

If you think those are grounds for Amaral to sue McCan supporters, then prepare to be deeply disappointed.

Carry on with the wishful thinking Carly - but that is all it is.

IMO

[carlymichelle]

amaral   has  everyright to sue people who have tarnished his name including the mcanns  which   he  going to from  what i have read

[Robittybob1]

stuff like he  drove  around   portugal with his little girl  drunk etc which is hersay claims that he killed his own dog  etc   calling him names like  A   M  O R   A  L  etc    claming he  was a bungling  cop  etc loads of other  stuff  defaming him  with stuff like he  was a    fat cop who dared to have  dinner     the  night maddie vanished etc    petty stufff imo

They all sound like opinions to me.

[Benice]

amaral   has  everyright to sue people who have tarnished his name including the mcanns  which   he  going to from  what i have read

So you don't think that acquiring a criminal conviction, committing adultery, swindling his own brother,  abusing his power whilst a policemen by breaking the law himself  and having his name mentioned by Amnesty International under the Torture section -  has tarnished his name in any way whatsoever?   Not even a tad?

There's no answer to that.

[stephen25000]

So you don't think that acquiring a criminal conviction, committing adultery, swindling his own brother,  abusing his power whilst a policemen by breaking the law himself  and having his name mentioned by Amnesty International under the Torture section -  has tarnished his name in any way whatsoever?   Not even a tad?

There's no answer to that.

Amaral tortured no one.

Committing adultery, are you kidding ..........................

Swindling his own brother. Has that been to court ?

[carlymichelle]

Amaral tortured no one.

Committing adultery, are you kidding ..........................

Swindling his own brother. Has that been to court ?

and amarals private life has nothing to do with the mcanns or supporters

[Mr Gray]

and amarals private life has nothing to do with the mcanns or supporters

it has to do with his reputation

[G-Unit]

For those who are interested the winner of a civil action in Portugal can claim from the losing party;

a) the justice tax paid by the winning party
b) the process charges paid by the winning party
c) 50% of the amount paid by the losing party for the justice tax for compensation
towards legal services of the winning party

The amounts of the fees are calculated in relation to the value of the initial claim.

Each additional hearing or appeal adds further costs.

[Alfie]

Is that it?   

If you think those are grounds for Amaral to sue McCan supporters, then prepare to be deeply disappointed.

Carry on with the wishful thinking Carly - but that is all it is.

IMO

LOL.  As no one is allowed to libel anyone on this forum, and all libel is quickly removed no one here has any reason to fear a libel action from anyone least of all unvengeful, un-greedy, non- arrogant, non-foolhardy jolly decent chaps like Amaral. 

[carlymichelle]

It is the McCann's who have lost, NOT ME.

they lost on their own accord

[ferryman]

Amaral's book is littered with examples, either of lies, or of careless references grossly at variance with the truth.

[Brietta]

Amaral tortured no one.

Committing adultery, are you kidding ..........................

Swindling his own brother. Has that been to court ?

Yes ... it has indeed been to court and is a matter of record.  It proved a horrendously expensive exercise for him as well as illustrating that his financial difficulties do not stem from Madeleine's case.

[stephen25000]

As the post contains the line
The McCanns probably wouldn't bother
You may have read it but you haven't understood it

I understand fine.

What you and others have to come to terms with is the enormity of the McCann's defeat, which I and others predicted.

[stephen25000]

Yes ... it has indeed been to court and is a matter of record.  It proved a horrendously expensive exercise for him as well as illustrating that his financial difficulties do not stem from Madeleine's case.

So you agree, Amaral tortured no one ?

...and this thing with his brother, what does it have to do with this case and Tuesdays decision ?